评估使用 RAP 和原生骨料的全深度复垦 (FDR) 混合物的强度

Ibrahim Ramadan, Khaled Salem, Ahmed M. Shokry, Mokhtar F. Ibrahim
{"title":"评估使用 RAP 和原生骨料的全深度复垦 (FDR) 混合物的强度","authors":"Ibrahim Ramadan, Khaled Salem, Ahmed M. Shokry, Mokhtar F. Ibrahim","doi":"10.21608/erjsh.2024.263655.1275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": One of the fastest techniques used to rehabilitate damaged pavement is full-depth reclamation (FDR). FDR technique depends on reusing the asphalt pavement using additives to form a durable base. These additives are mechanical, chemical, or bituminous. The most common type of additive used in FDR mixes is Portland cement. At the same time, Cement production represents a serious threat to the environment because of its dust. Therefore, this paper investigates the ability to use virgin aggregate as a mechanical additive because in some projects using the existing base is restricted due to the underground utilities and the second aim is to reduce the required percentages of the used cement. The tests were carried out on two mixes, the first mix is traditional FDR which includes recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and old aggregate. The second mix is traditional FDR and contains virgin aggregate (VA). The two mixes were treated with different percentages of cement (0,2,4, and 6%) by the dry weight of the mix. The conducted tests were compaction (Modified Proctor test) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test. The UCS test mixes were cured for 7 days. The results showed that the maximum dry density (MDD) and Optimum moisture Content (OMC) increased by an increasing in cement content for the two mixes. The UCS test result showed that by the increase in cement percentages, the UCS values increased for the two mixes and the optimum cement content (OCC) for mix2 was lower than mix1 at the same value of UCS.","PeriodicalId":159365,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Journal (Shoubra)","volume":"715 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Strength of Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Mixtures Using RAP and Virgin Aggregate\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Ramadan, Khaled Salem, Ahmed M. Shokry, Mokhtar F. Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/erjsh.2024.263655.1275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": One of the fastest techniques used to rehabilitate damaged pavement is full-depth reclamation (FDR). FDR technique depends on reusing the asphalt pavement using additives to form a durable base. These additives are mechanical, chemical, or bituminous. The most common type of additive used in FDR mixes is Portland cement. At the same time, Cement production represents a serious threat to the environment because of its dust. Therefore, this paper investigates the ability to use virgin aggregate as a mechanical additive because in some projects using the existing base is restricted due to the underground utilities and the second aim is to reduce the required percentages of the used cement. The tests were carried out on two mixes, the first mix is traditional FDR which includes recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and old aggregate. The second mix is traditional FDR and contains virgin aggregate (VA). The two mixes were treated with different percentages of cement (0,2,4, and 6%) by the dry weight of the mix. The conducted tests were compaction (Modified Proctor test) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test. The UCS test mixes were cured for 7 days. The results showed that the maximum dry density (MDD) and Optimum moisture Content (OMC) increased by an increasing in cement content for the two mixes. The UCS test result showed that by the increase in cement percentages, the UCS values increased for the two mixes and the optimum cement content (OCC) for mix2 was lower than mix1 at the same value of UCS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Research Journal (Shoubra)\",\"volume\":\"715 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Research Journal (Shoubra)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/erjsh.2024.263655.1275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Journal (Shoubra)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/erjsh.2024.263655.1275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:修复受损路面的最快技术之一是全深度再生(FDR)。全深度再生技术依赖于使用添加剂对沥青路面进行再利用,以形成耐久的路基。这些添加剂包括机械添加剂、化学添加剂或沥青添加剂。FDR 混合料中最常用的添加剂是波特兰水泥。与此同时,水泥生产过程中产生的粉尘对环境造成了严重威胁。因此,本文研究了使用原生骨料作为机械添加剂的能力,因为在某些项目中,由于地下公用设施的原因,使用现有基础受到限制,其次是为了减少所需的水泥用量百分比。测试在两种混合料上进行,第一种混合料是传统的 FDR,其中包括回收的沥青路面(RAP)和旧集料。第二种混合料是传统的 FDR 混合料,其中包含原生骨料(VA)。这两种混合料的水泥用量分别为混合料干重的 0、2、4 和 6%。进行的测试包括压实度(改良试验)和无压抗压强度(UCS)测试。无侧限抗压强度(UCS)试验混合料的固化时间为 7 天。结果表明,两种混合料的最大干密度(MDD)和最佳含水量(OMC)随着水泥含量的增加而增加。UCS 测试结果表明,随着水泥百分比的增加,两种混合料的 UCS 值也随之增加,在 UCS 值相同的情况下,混合料 2 的最佳水泥含量(OCC)低于混合料 1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Strength of Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Mixtures Using RAP and Virgin Aggregate
: One of the fastest techniques used to rehabilitate damaged pavement is full-depth reclamation (FDR). FDR technique depends on reusing the asphalt pavement using additives to form a durable base. These additives are mechanical, chemical, or bituminous. The most common type of additive used in FDR mixes is Portland cement. At the same time, Cement production represents a serious threat to the environment because of its dust. Therefore, this paper investigates the ability to use virgin aggregate as a mechanical additive because in some projects using the existing base is restricted due to the underground utilities and the second aim is to reduce the required percentages of the used cement. The tests were carried out on two mixes, the first mix is traditional FDR which includes recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and old aggregate. The second mix is traditional FDR and contains virgin aggregate (VA). The two mixes were treated with different percentages of cement (0,2,4, and 6%) by the dry weight of the mix. The conducted tests were compaction (Modified Proctor test) and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test. The UCS test mixes were cured for 7 days. The results showed that the maximum dry density (MDD) and Optimum moisture Content (OMC) increased by an increasing in cement content for the two mixes. The UCS test result showed that by the increase in cement percentages, the UCS values increased for the two mixes and the optimum cement content (OCC) for mix2 was lower than mix1 at the same value of UCS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design Of Mechanical Mixer for Synthetization Of Polymer Matrix Composites Evaluating the Strength of Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) Mixtures Using RAP and Virgin Aggregate Generative vs. Non-Generative AI: Analyzing the Effects of AI on the Architectural Design Process Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling of Wooden Elements Strengthened by FRP Wastewater treatment by using banana stems and rice straw as bio – carriers for agriculture purposes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1