Radwa Alsherbiny Alnaghy, Tariq Yehia, M. Elfaramawy
{"title":"评估不同生物陶瓷在修复窝洞穿孔中的密封能力:体外研究","authors":"Radwa Alsherbiny Alnaghy, Tariq Yehia, M. Elfaramawy","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.276541.2979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of MTA, Nano-MTA and Biodentine in the repair of furcation perforation by using bacterial leakage test. Methods and Materials: Standard access cavities and furcal perforations were made in fifty extracted mandibular permanent molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: perforations were repaired with MTA, Group 2: perforations were repaired with Nano-MTA and Group 3: perforations were repaired with Biodentine. Ten teeth with unrepaired perforations were used as positive controls and ten teeth without perforations were used as negative controls. The sealing ability was evaluated using Enterococcus faecalis Bacterial leakage test. The samples were observed for 45 days for turbidity using spectrophotometer. Results: High statistically significant difference in leakage was found between the three materials when used as furcation perforation repair materials. Nano-MTA presented the best sealing ability with the least bacterial leakage followed by MTA, while Biodentine showed maximum bacterial leakage. Conclusion: Nano-MTA has better sealing ability than MTA and Biodentine and can be used in repair of furcation perforation.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Sealing Ability of Different Bioceramics in Repair of Furcation Perforation: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Radwa Alsherbiny Alnaghy, Tariq Yehia, M. Elfaramawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.276541.2979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of MTA, Nano-MTA and Biodentine in the repair of furcation perforation by using bacterial leakage test. Methods and Materials: Standard access cavities and furcal perforations were made in fifty extracted mandibular permanent molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: perforations were repaired with MTA, Group 2: perforations were repaired with Nano-MTA and Group 3: perforations were repaired with Biodentine. Ten teeth with unrepaired perforations were used as positive controls and ten teeth without perforations were used as negative controls. The sealing ability was evaluated using Enterococcus faecalis Bacterial leakage test. The samples were observed for 45 days for turbidity using spectrophotometer. Results: High statistically significant difference in leakage was found between the three materials when used as furcation perforation repair materials. Nano-MTA presented the best sealing ability with the least bacterial leakage followed by MTA, while Biodentine showed maximum bacterial leakage. Conclusion: Nano-MTA has better sealing ability than MTA and Biodentine and can be used in repair of furcation perforation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.276541.2979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.276541.2979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介本研究旨在通过细菌渗漏试验,评估和比较 MTA、Nano-MTA 和 Biodentine 在修复窝洞穿孔时的密封能力。方法和材料:在 50 颗拔出的下颌恒磨牙上制作标准的入洞和窝洞穿孔。这些牙齿被随机分为五组。第一组:用 MTA 修复穿孔;第二组:用纳米 MTA 修复穿孔;第三组:用 Biodentine 修复穿孔。10 颗未修复穿孔的牙齿作为阳性对照,10 颗无穿孔的牙齿作为阴性对照。使用粪肠球菌细菌渗漏试验评估密封能力。使用分光光度计对样本进行 45 天的浊度观察。结果三种材料用作毛囊穿孔修补材料时,其渗漏率在统计学上有很大差异。纳米 MTA 的密封能力最强,细菌渗漏最少,其次是 MTA,而生物碱的细菌渗漏最多。结论:纳米 MTA 的密封能力优于 MTA 和 Biodentine,可用于修复窝洞穿孔。
Assessment of Sealing Ability of Different Bioceramics in Repair of Furcation Perforation: An In Vitro Study
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of MTA, Nano-MTA and Biodentine in the repair of furcation perforation by using bacterial leakage test. Methods and Materials: Standard access cavities and furcal perforations were made in fifty extracted mandibular permanent molars. The teeth were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1: perforations were repaired with MTA, Group 2: perforations were repaired with Nano-MTA and Group 3: perforations were repaired with Biodentine. Ten teeth with unrepaired perforations were used as positive controls and ten teeth without perforations were used as negative controls. The sealing ability was evaluated using Enterococcus faecalis Bacterial leakage test. The samples were observed for 45 days for turbidity using spectrophotometer. Results: High statistically significant difference in leakage was found between the three materials when used as furcation perforation repair materials. Nano-MTA presented the best sealing ability with the least bacterial leakage followed by MTA, while Biodentine showed maximum bacterial leakage. Conclusion: Nano-MTA has better sealing ability than MTA and Biodentine and can be used in repair of furcation perforation.