鼻骨-轨道-耳模骨折的固定技术对比:比较研究

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_402_24
Shiwangi Singh, Ankit A. Taide, Jasmine Kaur, Sanjukta Panda, Donka Srilakshmi, Anish Nelson, F. Baig
{"title":"鼻骨-轨道-耳模骨折的固定技术对比:比较研究","authors":"Shiwangi Singh, Ankit A. Taide, Jasmine Kaur, Sanjukta Panda, Donka Srilakshmi, Anish Nelson, F. Baig","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_402_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Comparing fixation procedures for managing naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures.\n \n \n \n Group A (plate and screw fixation), Group B (Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation), Group C (absorbable plate and screw fixation), and Group D (No fixation) were formed from 120 NOE fracture patients. The facial injury severity scale, visual analogue scale, CT scans, and clinical examination examined functional and cosmetic outcomes, complications, and postoperative stability.\n \n \n \n The study found that plate and screw fixation (Group A) had the highest stability and aesthetic results, followed by absorbable plate and screw fixation (Group C). Conservative management (Group D) had the worst outcomes, while K-wire fixation (Group B) had good results but more complications. Results showed substantial differences in functional, aesthetic, complications, and postoperative stability between groups (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n Plate and screw fixation is the most successful and dependable approach for treating NOE fractures, with superior functional and aesthetic outcomes, reduced complications, and higher postoperative stability than K-wire fixation, absorbable plate and screw fixation, and conservative care. Absorbable plate and screw fixation may function instead of metal. Conservative care should be rare. Larger multicenter randomized controlled trials should corroborate these findings.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evlauation of Fixation Techniques in Naso-orbito-ethmoidal Fractures: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Shiwangi Singh, Ankit A. Taide, Jasmine Kaur, Sanjukta Panda, Donka Srilakshmi, Anish Nelson, F. Baig\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_402_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n \\n \\n \\n Comparing fixation procedures for managing naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures.\\n \\n \\n \\n Group A (plate and screw fixation), Group B (Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation), Group C (absorbable plate and screw fixation), and Group D (No fixation) were formed from 120 NOE fracture patients. The facial injury severity scale, visual analogue scale, CT scans, and clinical examination examined functional and cosmetic outcomes, complications, and postoperative stability.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study found that plate and screw fixation (Group A) had the highest stability and aesthetic results, followed by absorbable plate and screw fixation (Group C). Conservative management (Group D) had the worst outcomes, while K-wire fixation (Group B) had good results but more complications. Results showed substantial differences in functional, aesthetic, complications, and postoperative stability between groups (P < 0.05).\\n \\n \\n \\n Plate and screw fixation is the most successful and dependable approach for treating NOE fractures, with superior functional and aesthetic outcomes, reduced complications, and higher postoperative stability than K-wire fixation, absorbable plate and screw fixation, and conservative care. Absorbable plate and screw fixation may function instead of metal. Conservative care should be rare. Larger multicenter randomized controlled trials should corroborate these findings.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_402_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_402_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 比较鼻眶外侧(NOE)骨折的固定方法。 120名鼻外耳道骨折患者组成了A组(钢板和螺钉固定)、B组(Kirschner钢丝(K-wire)固定)、C组(可吸收钢板和螺钉固定)和D组(无固定)。通过面部损伤严重程度量表、视觉模拟量表、CT 扫描和临床检查,对患者的功能和外观效果、并发症和术后稳定性进行了评估。 研究发现,钢板和螺钉固定(A 组)的稳定性和美观效果最好,其次是可吸收钢板和螺钉固定(C 组)。保守治疗(D 组)的效果最差,而 K 线固定(B 组)效果较好,但并发症较多。结果显示,各组之间在功能、美观、并发症和术后稳定性方面存在很大差异(P < 0.05)。 与 K 型钢丝固定、可吸收钢板和螺钉固定以及保守治疗相比,钢板和螺钉固定是治疗 NOE 骨折最成功、最可靠的方法,其功能和美学效果更佳,并发症更少,术后稳定性更高。可吸收钢板和螺钉固定可代替金属固定。保守治疗应属罕见。更大规模的多中心随机对照试验应能证实这些研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evlauation of Fixation Techniques in Naso-orbito-ethmoidal Fractures: A Comparative Study
ABSTRACT Comparing fixation procedures for managing naso-orbito-ethmoidal (NOE) fractures. Group A (plate and screw fixation), Group B (Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation), Group C (absorbable plate and screw fixation), and Group D (No fixation) were formed from 120 NOE fracture patients. The facial injury severity scale, visual analogue scale, CT scans, and clinical examination examined functional and cosmetic outcomes, complications, and postoperative stability. The study found that plate and screw fixation (Group A) had the highest stability and aesthetic results, followed by absorbable plate and screw fixation (Group C). Conservative management (Group D) had the worst outcomes, while K-wire fixation (Group B) had good results but more complications. Results showed substantial differences in functional, aesthetic, complications, and postoperative stability between groups (P < 0.05). Plate and screw fixation is the most successful and dependable approach for treating NOE fractures, with superior functional and aesthetic outcomes, reduced complications, and higher postoperative stability than K-wire fixation, absorbable plate and screw fixation, and conservative care. Absorbable plate and screw fixation may function instead of metal. Conservative care should be rare. Larger multicenter randomized controlled trials should corroborate these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Tele-Orthodontics in Enhancing Patient Compliance and Treatment Monitoring Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation in Dry Eye Syndrome: An In vitro Investigation Enhancing Precision in Endodontic Procedures: An In vitro Investigation of Magnification and Enhanced Visualization Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Techniques for Pterygium Management: An In Vitro Study Schoolchildren’s Musculoskeletal Pain and Backpack Weight Impact on Posture: A Short-Term Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1