欧洲压力容器标准中内压准则下锥形部件的比较分析与改进

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105257
Isaak Dassa , Dimitrios Mertzis , Konstantinos Karamitsios
{"title":"欧洲压力容器标准中内压准则下锥形部件的比较分析与改进","authors":"Isaak Dassa ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Mertzis ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Karamitsios","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 bar<sub>g</sub>. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54946,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 105257"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis and enhancement of conical component calculation under internal pressure in European pressure vessel Standards\",\"authors\":\"Isaak Dassa ,&nbsp;Dimitrios Mertzis ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Karamitsios\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 bar<sub>g</sub>. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"volume\":\"211 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016124001340\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308016124001340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对压力容器中的锥形部件进行了全面分析,强调了这些部件在不同直径或坡度之间过渡时的重要性。本文强调了全面的设计和分析对于确保这些部件在不同负载情况下的安全性和可靠性至关重要。本文旨在对有关内压锥形部件的欧洲压力容器标准提出改进建议,重点是提高安全性和可靠性,并符合行业标准。本文回顾了现有的欧洲标准,找出了潜在的差距,并提出了切实可行的解决方案。论文还介绍了锥顶角、壳体几何形状和设计压力对锥板厚度计算影响的研究成果。论文提出了设计和分析压力容器锥形部件的新方法,为实现更安全、更高效的压力容器提供了潜在途径。将直径在 1000 至 2500 毫米之间、锥角在 30° 至 60° 之间的圆筒作为输入,量化设计压力在 10 至 200 barg 之间时锥板厚度的差异。与 EN13445 相比,拟议方法得出的结果更接近 AD2000,与前者相比,锥体略厚(在选定的锥体直径和角度范围内最厚为 2.2 毫米),从而使压力容器设计更安全,而与后者相比,锥体更薄(最薄为 22 毫米),从而大大节省了材料。通过有限元分析进行了对比分析,验证了 EN13445 不适合锥体厚度计算。建议对 EN13445 中的公式 (7.6)-(8) 进行修改,从而在选定的气缸直径和锥角范围内,将锥板厚度差平均减小到 0.9%,而目前的偏差平均为 -9.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis and enhancement of conical component calculation under internal pressure in European pressure vessel Standards

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of conical components in pressure vessels emphasizing their significance when utilized to transition between different diameters or slopes. A thorough design and analysis are underscored as essential for ensuring the safety and reliability of these components under diverse loading circumstances. The paper aims to propose enhancements to the European Pressure Vessel Standards concerning conical components under internal pressure, with a focus on improving safety, reliability, and compliance with industry standards. Existing European standards are reviewed, identifying potential gaps and proposing practical solutions. The paper also presents research findings on the influence of cone apex angles, shell geometries and design pressure on cone plate thickness calculations. A new methodology for the design and analysis of conical components in pressure vessels is proposed, offering a potential pathway to safer and more efficient pressure vessels. A range of cylinder diameter between 1000 and 2500 mm and cone angles between 30° and 60° are used as input to quantify the difference in cone thickness for a design pressure ranging between 10 and 200 barg. The proposed method yields results much closer to AD2000 compared to EN13445, leading to slightly thicker cones (up to 2.2 mm for the selected range of cone diameters and angles) compared to the former, resulting in safer pressure vessel design, and thinner cones (up to 22 mm) compared to the latter resulting in significant material savings. A comparative analysis was performed through Finite Element Analysis validating the EN13445 unsuitability for cone thickness calculations. A modification is proposed for equation (7.6)-(8) in EN13445 resulting in thinner plates reducing the cone plate thickness difference to 0.9 % on average compared to the current deviation of -9.6 % on average for the selected range of cylinder diameters and cone angles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
17 months
期刊介绍: Pressure vessel engineering technology is of importance in many branches of industry. This journal publishes the latest research results and related information on all its associated aspects, with particular emphasis on the structural integrity assessment, maintenance and life extension of pressurised process engineering plants. The anticipated coverage of the International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping ranges from simple mass-produced pressure vessels to large custom-built vessels and tanks. Pressure vessels technology is a developing field, and contributions on the following topics will therefore be welcome: • Pressure vessel engineering • Structural integrity assessment • Design methods • Codes and standards • Fabrication and welding • Materials properties requirements • Inspection and quality management • Maintenance and life extension • Ageing and environmental effects • Life management Of particular importance are papers covering aspects of significant practical application which could lead to major improvements in economy, reliability and useful life. While most accepted papers represent the results of original applied research, critical reviews of topical interest by world-leading experts will also appear from time to time. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping is indispensable reading for engineering professionals involved in the energy, petrochemicals, process plant, transport, aerospace and related industries; for manufacturers of pressure vessels and ancillary equipment; and for academics pursuing research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced creep lifetime in P91 steel weldments via stabilizing tempered martensite structure Study on stress concentration and fatigue life of tubing with slip indentation Failure mechanisms of fusion-bonded reinforcement joints in reinforced thermoplastic pipes under uniaxial tensile conditions A comprehensive finite element framework for modeling of PEX-Al-PEX composite pipes Effects of different types of corrosion on seismic performance of circular hollow section T-joints subjected to coupling load
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1