重新审视可验证(外包)计算中使用的隐私保护变换

IF 7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334890
Liang Zhao, Liqun Chen
{"title":"重新审视可验证(外包)计算中使用的隐私保护变换","authors":"Liang Zhao, Liqun Chen","doi":"10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a privacy-preserving technique called Privacy-Preserving Matrix Transformation (PPMT) is widely used to construct efficient privacy-preserving Verifiable (outsourced) Computation (VC) protocols for specific functions. This technique is first proposed and formalized by Salinas et al. in 2015, and it enjoys provable privacy and high efficiency. Although it seems that Salinas et al.'s PPMT scheme and the further modified scheme are elegant, we still need to take a step back and precisely discuss whether the PPMT schemes are suitable choices for VC protocols. Since Salinas et al. gave two concrete PPMT schemes to achieve the matrix-related VC in data protection and proved that their schemes are private (in terms of indistinguishability), and Zhou et al. devised a new type of PPMT scheme for the same purpose, we focus on exploring privacy of these three types of PPMT schemes. In this article, to achieve our object, we first propose the concept of a linear distinguisher and two constructions of the linear distinguisher algorithms. In particular, the linear distinguisher is a polynomial-time algorithm employed by an adversary to explore the privacy property of a cryptographic primitive. Then, we take these three PPMT schemes (including Salinas et al.'s original work, Yu et al.'s generalization and Zhou et al.'s variant) as targets and analyze their privacy property by letting an adversary make use of our linear distinguisher algorithms. The analysis results show that all these three types of transformations do not hold privacy even against passive eavesdropping (i.e., a ciphertext-only attack), and subsequently, the privacy-preserving VC protocols, based on any of these PPMT schemes, also do not hold the same privacy.","PeriodicalId":13047,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy-Preserving Transformation Used in Verifiable (Outsourced) Computation, Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Liang Zhao, Liqun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, a privacy-preserving technique called Privacy-Preserving Matrix Transformation (PPMT) is widely used to construct efficient privacy-preserving Verifiable (outsourced) Computation (VC) protocols for specific functions. This technique is first proposed and formalized by Salinas et al. in 2015, and it enjoys provable privacy and high efficiency. Although it seems that Salinas et al.'s PPMT scheme and the further modified scheme are elegant, we still need to take a step back and precisely discuss whether the PPMT schemes are suitable choices for VC protocols. Since Salinas et al. gave two concrete PPMT schemes to achieve the matrix-related VC in data protection and proved that their schemes are private (in terms of indistinguishability), and Zhou et al. devised a new type of PPMT scheme for the same purpose, we focus on exploring privacy of these three types of PPMT schemes. In this article, to achieve our object, we first propose the concept of a linear distinguisher and two constructions of the linear distinguisher algorithms. In particular, the linear distinguisher is a polynomial-time algorithm employed by an adversary to explore the privacy property of a cryptographic primitive. Then, we take these three PPMT schemes (including Salinas et al.'s original work, Yu et al.'s generalization and Zhou et al.'s variant) as targets and analyze their privacy property by letting an adversary make use of our linear distinguisher algorithms. The analysis results show that all these three types of transformations do not hold privacy even against passive eavesdropping (i.e., a ciphertext-only attack), and subsequently, the privacy-preserving VC protocols, based on any of these PPMT schemes, also do not hold the same privacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334890\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3334890","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,一种名为隐私保护矩阵变换(Privacy-Preserving Matrix Transformation,PPMT)的隐私保护技术被广泛用于为特定函数构建高效的隐私保护可验证(外包)计算(VC)协议。该技术由 Salinas 等人于 2015 年首次提出并正式化,具有可证明的隐私性和高效性。虽然看起来 Salinas 等人的 PPMT 方案和进一步修改后的方案都很优雅,但我们仍需要退一步,精确地讨论 PPMT 方案是否适合用于 VC 协议。由于 Salinas 等人给出了两种具体的 PPMT 方案来实现数据保护中与矩阵相关的 VC,并证明了他们的方案是私有的(在不可区分性方面),而 Zhou 等人出于同样的目的设计了一种新型 PPMT 方案,因此我们重点探讨这三种 PPMT 方案的隐私性。在本文中,为了实现我们的目标,我们首先提出了线性区分器的概念和两种线性区分算法的构造。具体来说,线性区分器是一种多项式时间算法,它被对手用来探索加密基元的隐私属性。然后,我们以这三种 PPMT 方案(包括 Salinas 等人的原创作品、Yu 等人的泛化作品和 Zhou 等人的变体作品)为目标,通过让对手使用我们的线性区分算法来分析它们的隐私属性。分析结果表明,所有这三类变换即使面对被动窃听(即只针对密文的攻击)也无法保护隐私,因此,基于任何一种 PPMT 方案的隐私保护 VC 协议也无法保护同样的隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy-Preserving Transformation Used in Verifiable (Outsourced) Computation, Revisited
Recently, a privacy-preserving technique called Privacy-Preserving Matrix Transformation (PPMT) is widely used to construct efficient privacy-preserving Verifiable (outsourced) Computation (VC) protocols for specific functions. This technique is first proposed and formalized by Salinas et al. in 2015, and it enjoys provable privacy and high efficiency. Although it seems that Salinas et al.'s PPMT scheme and the further modified scheme are elegant, we still need to take a step back and precisely discuss whether the PPMT schemes are suitable choices for VC protocols. Since Salinas et al. gave two concrete PPMT schemes to achieve the matrix-related VC in data protection and proved that their schemes are private (in terms of indistinguishability), and Zhou et al. devised a new type of PPMT scheme for the same purpose, we focus on exploring privacy of these three types of PPMT schemes. In this article, to achieve our object, we first propose the concept of a linear distinguisher and two constructions of the linear distinguisher algorithms. In particular, the linear distinguisher is a polynomial-time algorithm employed by an adversary to explore the privacy property of a cryptographic primitive. Then, we take these three PPMT schemes (including Salinas et al.'s original work, Yu et al.'s generalization and Zhou et al.'s variant) as targets and analyze their privacy property by letting an adversary make use of our linear distinguisher algorithms. The analysis results show that all these three types of transformations do not hold privacy even against passive eavesdropping (i.e., a ciphertext-only attack), and subsequently, the privacy-preserving VC protocols, based on any of these PPMT schemes, also do not hold the same privacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The "IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (TDSC)" is a prestigious journal that publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research in the field of computer science, specifically targeting the development of dependable and secure computing systems and networks. This journal is dedicated to exploring the fundamental principles, methodologies, and mechanisms that enable the design, modeling, and evaluation of systems that meet the required levels of reliability, security, and performance. The scope of TDSC includes research on measurement, modeling, and simulation techniques that contribute to the understanding and improvement of system performance under various constraints. It also covers the foundations necessary for the joint evaluation, verification, and design of systems that balance performance, security, and dependability. By publishing archival research results, TDSC aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners working in the areas of cybersecurity, fault tolerance, and system reliability. The journal's focus on cutting-edge research ensures that it remains at the forefront of advancements in the field, promoting the development of technologies that are critical for the functioning of modern, complex systems.
期刊最新文献
DSChain: A Blockchain System for Complete Lifecycle Security of Data in Internet of Things Privacy-Preserving and Energy-Saving Random Forest-Based Disease Detection Framework for Green Internet of Things in Mobile Healthcare Networks IvyRedaction: Enabling Atomic, Consistent and Accountable Cross-Chain Rewriting Multi-Adjustable Join Schemes With Adaptive Indistinguishably Security User Authentication on Earable Devices via Bone-Conducted Occlusion Sounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1