德克萨斯黑地草原上的高等教育:三一学院的内战时代

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a932553
Sarah Beth Kaufman
{"title":"德克萨斯黑地草原上的高等教育:三一学院的内战时代","authors":"Sarah Beth Kaufman","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Higher Education on the Texas Blackland Prairie: <span>Trinity University’s Civil War Era</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sarah Beth Kaufman (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>A</strong><small>cross the</small> U<small>nited</small> S<small>tates, institutions of higher learning are</small> grappling with legacies rooted in slavery. Catalyzed by the historic mandate of Brown University president Ruth J. Simmons, the first Black woman to lead an Ivy League school, colleges and universities have documented the role of enslaved labor, celebrated the accomplishments of formerly enslaved members of their communities, and taken steps toward reconciliation.<sup>1</sup> This essay extends such work, centering the slave economy’s influence on universities founded during southern Reconstruction. Scholars argue that Civil War–era racial capital deserves more attention.<sup>2</sup> The story of Trinity University’s founding illuminates one aspect of this era: how higher education funneled wealth gained from enslavement before the Civil War to Protestant Anglo children after slavery’s abolition. Drawing on materials such as letters from the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands (the Freedmen’s Bureau) and university archival records, this essay provides a model for other southern colleges and universities founded during the Civil War era to clarify how they, too, benefited from the slave economy. <strong>[End Page 503]</strong></p> <p>Today, Trinity University is a small private school in San Antonio, Texas. With an enrollment of over 2,500 undergraduate students, it ranks among the top fifty liberal arts schools in the United States, and it has an endowment to match.<sup>3</sup> Like other predominantly white institutions, Trinity has historically served students racialized as white (herein referred to as “white” or “Anglo”), to the detriment of minoritized racial groups, particularly those racialized as Black.<sup>4</sup> Trinity was opened in 1869 by Cumberland Presbyterians as one of the many evangelical colleges propagated throughout the South during the later nineteenth century. The school is now secular, with a covenantal relationship with the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). It resided for the first half of the twentieth century in Waxahachie, Texas, near Dallas, before moving to its current home in San Antonio. But Trinity University was begun in a remote settlement in east central Texas called the Tehuacana Hills, in Limestone County. It was not founded by a single person or family but by a group of Anglo church and community leaders who were wealthy enough to donate land and money, sit on the board of trustees, and travel to solicit contributions for the school. Most of these were farmer- businessmen-ministers who migrated from prominent families in the lower southern states, who enslaved people, and who fought for the Confederacy. Despite losing significant wealth as a result of the Civil War, Trinity’s founders established one of only twenty private colleges in Texas to survive into the late twentieth century, out of the almost one hundred that had been founded in the 1800s.<sup>5</sup> <strong>[End Page 504]</strong></p> <p>This essay describes how Trinity’s founders were able to accomplish their institution’s unlikely survival and enrich their own positions by creating a valuable new educational commodity. The story of their success—previously chronicled as a triumph of pious men—is also embedded in the failure of southern Reconstruction to create meaningful opportunities for those freed from enslavement.<sup>6</sup> In a process sociologists call “opportunity hoarding,” the founders consolidated scarce resources for use by their own semiclosed networks.<sup>7</sup> They founded an all-white, private university with wealth gained from enslavement while simultaneously undermining attempts to establish an educational system for Black children, an illustration of the inextricable entwinement of racialization and capital accumulation—or <em>racial capitalism</em>—developing in the early modern United States.<sup>8</sup> Trinity University remained closed to Black students until after <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> (1954).<sup>9</sup> But its first generation of all-white graduates were positioned to profit from the emerging “military-cotton complex” that swept nineteenth-century Texas, helping sustain the severe economic and racial hierarchies of the region into the twentieth century.<sup>10</sup> As such, Trinity’s history connects the field of universities studying slavery into the era of Reconstruction and beyond.</p> <p>The historiography of nineteenth-century higher education is commonly broken into two periods on either side of the Civil War.<sup>11</sup> <strong>[End Page 505]</strong> Early-nineteenth-century...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Education on the Texas Blackland Prairie: Trinity University's Civil War Era\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Beth Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a932553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Higher Education on the Texas Blackland Prairie: <span>Trinity University’s Civil War Era</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sarah Beth Kaufman (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>A</strong><small>cross the</small> U<small>nited</small> S<small>tates, institutions of higher learning are</small> grappling with legacies rooted in slavery. Catalyzed by the historic mandate of Brown University president Ruth J. Simmons, the first Black woman to lead an Ivy League school, colleges and universities have documented the role of enslaved labor, celebrated the accomplishments of formerly enslaved members of their communities, and taken steps toward reconciliation.<sup>1</sup> This essay extends such work, centering the slave economy’s influence on universities founded during southern Reconstruction. Scholars argue that Civil War–era racial capital deserves more attention.<sup>2</sup> The story of Trinity University’s founding illuminates one aspect of this era: how higher education funneled wealth gained from enslavement before the Civil War to Protestant Anglo children after slavery’s abolition. Drawing on materials such as letters from the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands (the Freedmen’s Bureau) and university archival records, this essay provides a model for other southern colleges and universities founded during the Civil War era to clarify how they, too, benefited from the slave economy. <strong>[End Page 503]</strong></p> <p>Today, Trinity University is a small private school in San Antonio, Texas. With an enrollment of over 2,500 undergraduate students, it ranks among the top fifty liberal arts schools in the United States, and it has an endowment to match.<sup>3</sup> Like other predominantly white institutions, Trinity has historically served students racialized as white (herein referred to as “white” or “Anglo”), to the detriment of minoritized racial groups, particularly those racialized as Black.<sup>4</sup> Trinity was opened in 1869 by Cumberland Presbyterians as one of the many evangelical colleges propagated throughout the South during the later nineteenth century. The school is now secular, with a covenantal relationship with the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). It resided for the first half of the twentieth century in Waxahachie, Texas, near Dallas, before moving to its current home in San Antonio. But Trinity University was begun in a remote settlement in east central Texas called the Tehuacana Hills, in Limestone County. It was not founded by a single person or family but by a group of Anglo church and community leaders who were wealthy enough to donate land and money, sit on the board of trustees, and travel to solicit contributions for the school. Most of these were farmer- businessmen-ministers who migrated from prominent families in the lower southern states, who enslaved people, and who fought for the Confederacy. Despite losing significant wealth as a result of the Civil War, Trinity’s founders established one of only twenty private colleges in Texas to survive into the late twentieth century, out of the almost one hundred that had been founded in the 1800s.<sup>5</sup> <strong>[End Page 504]</strong></p> <p>This essay describes how Trinity’s founders were able to accomplish their institution’s unlikely survival and enrich their own positions by creating a valuable new educational commodity. The story of their success—previously chronicled as a triumph of pious men—is also embedded in the failure of southern Reconstruction to create meaningful opportunities for those freed from enslavement.<sup>6</sup> In a process sociologists call “opportunity hoarding,” the founders consolidated scarce resources for use by their own semiclosed networks.<sup>7</sup> They founded an all-white, private university with wealth gained from enslavement while simultaneously undermining attempts to establish an educational system for Black children, an illustration of the inextricable entwinement of racialization and capital accumulation—or <em>racial capitalism</em>—developing in the early modern United States.<sup>8</sup> Trinity University remained closed to Black students until after <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> (1954).<sup>9</sup> But its first generation of all-white graduates were positioned to profit from the emerging “military-cotton complex” that swept nineteenth-century Texas, helping sustain the severe economic and racial hierarchies of the region into the twentieth century.<sup>10</sup> As such, Trinity’s history connects the field of universities studying slavery into the era of Reconstruction and beyond.</p> <p>The historiography of nineteenth-century higher education is commonly broken into two periods on either side of the Civil War.<sup>11</sup> <strong>[End Page 505]</strong> Early-nineteenth-century...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 德克萨斯黑地草原上的高等教育:三一大学的内战时代 萨拉-贝丝-考夫曼(Sarah Beth Kaufman)(简历) 在美国各地,高等教育机构都在努力解决奴隶制遗留下来的问题。布朗大学校长露丝-J-西蒙斯(Ruth J. Simmons)是第一位领导常春藤盟校的黑人女性,在她的历史性任务的推动下,各高校记录了受奴役劳工的作用,颂扬了社区中曾经受奴役成员的成就,并采取了和解措施1。学者们认为,内战时期的种族资本值得更多关注。2 三一大学的创建故事揭示了这一时代的一个方面:高等教育如何将内战前奴役所得财富输送给奴隶制废除后的新教盎格鲁儿童。这篇文章利用难民、自由人和遗弃土地局(Freedmen's Bureau)的信件和大学档案记录等材料,为内战时期建立的其他南方学院和大学提供了一个范例,以阐明它们也是如何从奴隶经济中获益的。[第 503 页完] 如今,圣三一大学是德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市的一所小型私立学校。它的本科生人数超过 2,500 人,跻身美国文理学院前五十名之列,并拥有与之相匹配的捐赠基金。与其他以白人为主的学校一样,三一学院在历史上一直为白人学生(在此称为 "白 人 "或 "盎格鲁人")服务,而不利于少数种族群体,特别是黑人学生。4 三一学院由坎伯兰长老会于 1869 年开办,是 19 世纪后期在整个南方传播福音的众多学院之一。4 三一学院于 1869 年由坎伯兰长老会开办,是十九世纪后期在南方传播的众多福音派学院之一。该学院现在是世俗的,与美国长老会保持盟约关系。二十世纪上半叶,学校位于德克萨斯州达拉斯附近的瓦克萨哈奇,之后搬迁到圣安东尼奥的现址。但是,圣三一大学是在德克萨斯州中部偏远的特瓦卡纳山(Tehuacana Hills)建立的,位于石灰岩县(Limestone County)。它不是由一个人或一个家族创办的,而是由一群盎格鲁教会和社区领袖创办的,他们都很富有,可以捐赠土地和资金,担任董事会成员,并四处奔走为学校募捐。他们中的大多数人都是农民、商人和牧师,他们来自南方各州的名门望族,曾经奴役过人民,并为南方邦联打过仗。尽管内战使他们失去了大量财富,但三一学院的创建者们还是建立了德克萨斯州仅有的 20 所私立学院之一,这些学院在 19 世纪建立的近百所学院中一直存活到 20 世纪末。他们成功的故事--以前被记载为虔诚者的胜利--也与南部重建未能为那些从奴役中解放出来的人创造有意义的机会息息相关。他们用从奴役中获得的财富创办了一所全白人的私立大学,同时又破坏了为黑人儿童建立教育体系的尝试,这说明了种族化与资本积累--或种族资本主义--不可分割地纠缠在一起,并在现代美国早期发展起来。直到布朗诉教育委员会案(Brown v. Board of Education,1954 年)之后,圣三一大学仍不对黑人学生开放。9 但该校第一代全白人毕业生从席卷 19 世纪得克萨斯州的新兴 "军事棉花综合体 "中获利,帮助该地区将严重的经济和种族等级制度维持到 20 世纪。关于 19 世纪高等教育的史学研究通常分为南北战争两边的两个时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Higher Education on the Texas Blackland Prairie: Trinity University's Civil War Era
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Higher Education on the Texas Blackland Prairie: Trinity University’s Civil War Era
  • Sarah Beth Kaufman (bio)

Across the United States, institutions of higher learning are grappling with legacies rooted in slavery. Catalyzed by the historic mandate of Brown University president Ruth J. Simmons, the first Black woman to lead an Ivy League school, colleges and universities have documented the role of enslaved labor, celebrated the accomplishments of formerly enslaved members of their communities, and taken steps toward reconciliation.1 This essay extends such work, centering the slave economy’s influence on universities founded during southern Reconstruction. Scholars argue that Civil War–era racial capital deserves more attention.2 The story of Trinity University’s founding illuminates one aspect of this era: how higher education funneled wealth gained from enslavement before the Civil War to Protestant Anglo children after slavery’s abolition. Drawing on materials such as letters from the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands (the Freedmen’s Bureau) and university archival records, this essay provides a model for other southern colleges and universities founded during the Civil War era to clarify how they, too, benefited from the slave economy. [End Page 503]

Today, Trinity University is a small private school in San Antonio, Texas. With an enrollment of over 2,500 undergraduate students, it ranks among the top fifty liberal arts schools in the United States, and it has an endowment to match.3 Like other predominantly white institutions, Trinity has historically served students racialized as white (herein referred to as “white” or “Anglo”), to the detriment of minoritized racial groups, particularly those racialized as Black.4 Trinity was opened in 1869 by Cumberland Presbyterians as one of the many evangelical colleges propagated throughout the South during the later nineteenth century. The school is now secular, with a covenantal relationship with the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). It resided for the first half of the twentieth century in Waxahachie, Texas, near Dallas, before moving to its current home in San Antonio. But Trinity University was begun in a remote settlement in east central Texas called the Tehuacana Hills, in Limestone County. It was not founded by a single person or family but by a group of Anglo church and community leaders who were wealthy enough to donate land and money, sit on the board of trustees, and travel to solicit contributions for the school. Most of these were farmer- businessmen-ministers who migrated from prominent families in the lower southern states, who enslaved people, and who fought for the Confederacy. Despite losing significant wealth as a result of the Civil War, Trinity’s founders established one of only twenty private colleges in Texas to survive into the late twentieth century, out of the almost one hundred that had been founded in the 1800s.5 [End Page 504]

This essay describes how Trinity’s founders were able to accomplish their institution’s unlikely survival and enrich their own positions by creating a valuable new educational commodity. The story of their success—previously chronicled as a triumph of pious men—is also embedded in the failure of southern Reconstruction to create meaningful opportunities for those freed from enslavement.6 In a process sociologists call “opportunity hoarding,” the founders consolidated scarce resources for use by their own semiclosed networks.7 They founded an all-white, private university with wealth gained from enslavement while simultaneously undermining attempts to establish an educational system for Black children, an illustration of the inextricable entwinement of racialization and capital accumulation—or racial capitalism—developing in the early modern United States.8 Trinity University remained closed to Black students until after Brown v. Board of Education (1954).9 But its first generation of all-white graduates were positioned to profit from the emerging “military-cotton complex” that swept nineteenth-century Texas, helping sustain the severe economic and racial hierarchies of the region into the twentieth century.10 As such, Trinity’s history connects the field of universities studying slavery into the era of Reconstruction and beyond.

The historiography of nineteenth-century higher education is commonly broken into two periods on either side of the Civil War.11 [End Page 505] Early-nineteenth-century...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
Faith, Race, and the Lost Cause: Confessions of a Southern Church by Christopher Alan Graham (review) Nothing More Than Freedom: The Failure of Abolition in American Law by Giuliana Perrone (review) A Man of Bad Reputation: The Murder of John Stephens and the Contested Landscape of North Carolina Reconstruction by Drew A. Swanson (review) Ruin and Resilience: Southern Literature and the Environment by Daniel Spoth (review) In the Shadows of the Big House: Twenty-First-Century Antebellum Slave Cabins and Heritage Tourism in Louisiana by Stephen Small (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1