是的,有一个 "Quare"/Queer South!:评论文章

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a932555
Leisa D. Meyer
{"title":"是的,有一个 \"Quare\"/Queer South!:评论文章","authors":"Leisa D. Meyer","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Yes, There Is a “Quare”/Queer South!: <span>A Review Essay</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Leisa D. Meyer (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Real Rainbow Row: Explorations in Charleston’s LGBTQ History</em>. By Harlan Greene. (Charleston, S.C.: Evening Post Books, 2022. Pp. xiv, 337. Paper, $34.95, ISBN 978-1-929647-76-7.) <em>Drastic Dykes and Accidental Activists: Queer Women in the Urban South</em>. By La Shonda Mims. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. xviii, 237. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7055-3; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7054-6.) <em>Before <span>Lawrence v. Texas</span>: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em>. By Wesley G. Phelps. Jack and Doris Smothers Series in Texas History, Life, and Culture. (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. x, 292. $34.95, ISBN 978-1-4773-2232-1.) <p>R<small>ecently</small> I <small>was</small> <small>one</small> <small>of</small> <small>the</small> <small>faculty</small> <small>representing</small> W<small>illiam</small> &amp; Mary at an “affinity group” breakfast for parents and friends of newly admitted students. This particular affinity group was for families whose children identified as LGBTQ+. The most frequent question (and, in many ways, the biggest fear) expressed by those attending was whether their child would be safe at William &amp; Mary. When I asked them to expand on the question, their focus was not if their child would be “safe” at college, but rather if their queer child would be “safe” in “the South.” I cannot blame them for the assumption they were making, that the southeastern United States—the “American South”—was likely to be less welcoming of their queer children. In our current cultural moment, when there is an ever-expanding number of laws being passed in state legislatures focused on regulating the bodies of women and youths (and particularly trans youths), the states occupying the southeastern portion of the United States are certainly leading the way on some of these measures.<sup>1</sup> That said, as we spoke more, it became clear <strong>[End Page 581]</strong> that their presumption that the South might be dangerous for their children was also based in their sincere belief that there was nothing queer in the South—that it is a region queer people flee from not to, and that it is a region where LGBTQ+ culture never had the opportunity to develop and was stifled if it was tried.</p> <p>This presumption seems even more problematic given the explosion of books, articles, and digital projects (among other online and print publications) that we have witnessed in the last two-plus decades engaging and narrativizing the “queer South.”<sup>2</sup> Among this work is Mary L. Gray’s study on Appalachian Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee, <em>Out in the Country</em>, which finds some truth to the assumptions made by the William &amp; Mary families. Yet Gray also finds evidence to push back—in, for example, the impromptu Walmart drag balls created by a half dozen queer high school students and facilitated by a friend who worked there. These balls ran for almost a year before being shut down by local authorities and Walmart management. In her ethnographic research, Gray also finds that “kinship” often translated into protection for some, even if their nonnormative gender and/or sexual identities contravened extant religiously based standards of behavior. Here Gray holds that the broadly defined familial associations of individuals meant that “kin” would sometimes intervene between those who would punish and those kinsmen and kinswomen who were the targets of retribution. Often, though, these kin protectors/allies might themselves have targeted someone else for a similar “offense.”<sup>3</sup></p> <p>Moreover, these families’ presumption that the Bible belt (a term used by one parent) was a space where nothing queer could grow might also <strong>[End Page 582]</strong> have some truth to it. Yet the recent monograph by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal, <em>Living Queer History</em>, documents the long-standing and quite visible queer communities and cultures in Roanoke, Virginia, a small city located on the northern edge of the Bible belt and abutting Appalachia, in what is generally understood to be one of the more conservative areas of the commonwealth. Rosenthal details the collaborative work that she and Roanoke College students have done over eight years with individuals from local Roanoke queer communities—work that was initiated by some...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":45484,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yes, There Is a \\\"Quare\\\"/Queer South!: A Review Essay\",\"authors\":\"Leisa D. Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/soh.2024.a932555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Yes, There Is a “Quare”/Queer South!: <span>A Review Essay</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Leisa D. Meyer (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Real Rainbow Row: Explorations in Charleston’s LGBTQ History</em>. By Harlan Greene. (Charleston, S.C.: Evening Post Books, 2022. Pp. xiv, 337. Paper, $34.95, ISBN 978-1-929647-76-7.) <em>Drastic Dykes and Accidental Activists: Queer Women in the Urban South</em>. By La Shonda Mims. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. xviii, 237. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7055-3; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7054-6.) <em>Before <span>Lawrence v. Texas</span>: The Making of a Queer Social Movement</em>. By Wesley G. Phelps. Jack and Doris Smothers Series in Texas History, Life, and Culture. (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. x, 292. $34.95, ISBN 978-1-4773-2232-1.) <p>R<small>ecently</small> I <small>was</small> <small>one</small> <small>of</small> <small>the</small> <small>faculty</small> <small>representing</small> W<small>illiam</small> &amp; Mary at an “affinity group” breakfast for parents and friends of newly admitted students. This particular affinity group was for families whose children identified as LGBTQ+. The most frequent question (and, in many ways, the biggest fear) expressed by those attending was whether their child would be safe at William &amp; Mary. When I asked them to expand on the question, their focus was not if their child would be “safe” at college, but rather if their queer child would be “safe” in “the South.” I cannot blame them for the assumption they were making, that the southeastern United States—the “American South”—was likely to be less welcoming of their queer children. In our current cultural moment, when there is an ever-expanding number of laws being passed in state legislatures focused on regulating the bodies of women and youths (and particularly trans youths), the states occupying the southeastern portion of the United States are certainly leading the way on some of these measures.<sup>1</sup> That said, as we spoke more, it became clear <strong>[End Page 581]</strong> that their presumption that the South might be dangerous for their children was also based in their sincere belief that there was nothing queer in the South—that it is a region queer people flee from not to, and that it is a region where LGBTQ+ culture never had the opportunity to develop and was stifled if it was tried.</p> <p>This presumption seems even more problematic given the explosion of books, articles, and digital projects (among other online and print publications) that we have witnessed in the last two-plus decades engaging and narrativizing the “queer South.”<sup>2</sup> Among this work is Mary L. Gray’s study on Appalachian Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee, <em>Out in the Country</em>, which finds some truth to the assumptions made by the William &amp; Mary families. Yet Gray also finds evidence to push back—in, for example, the impromptu Walmart drag balls created by a half dozen queer high school students and facilitated by a friend who worked there. These balls ran for almost a year before being shut down by local authorities and Walmart management. In her ethnographic research, Gray also finds that “kinship” often translated into protection for some, even if their nonnormative gender and/or sexual identities contravened extant religiously based standards of behavior. Here Gray holds that the broadly defined familial associations of individuals meant that “kin” would sometimes intervene between those who would punish and those kinsmen and kinswomen who were the targets of retribution. Often, though, these kin protectors/allies might themselves have targeted someone else for a similar “offense.”<sup>3</sup></p> <p>Moreover, these families’ presumption that the Bible belt (a term used by one parent) was a space where nothing queer could grow might also <strong>[End Page 582]</strong> have some truth to it. Yet the recent monograph by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal, <em>Living Queer History</em>, documents the long-standing and quite visible queer communities and cultures in Roanoke, Virginia, a small city located on the northern edge of the Bible belt and abutting Appalachia, in what is generally understood to be one of the more conservative areas of the commonwealth. Rosenthal details the collaborative work that she and Roanoke College students have done over eight years with individuals from local Roanoke queer communities—work that was initiated by some...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932555\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 是的,有一个 "Quare"/Queer South!Leisa D. Meyer (bio) 的评论文章《真正的彩虹行:查尔斯顿 LGBTQ 历史探索》(The Real Rainbow Row: Explorations in Charleston's LGBTQ History)。作者:哈伦-格林。(南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿:晚邮报书店,2022 年。第 xiv 页,第 337 页。纸质版,34.95 美元,ISBN 978-1-929647-76-7)。Drastic Dykes and Accidental Activists:南方城市中的同性恋女性》(Drastic Dykes and Accidental Activists: Queer Women in the Urban South)。作者:La Shonda Mims。(Chapel Hill:Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022.xviii, 237页。纸质版,24.95 美元,ISBN 978-1-4696-7055-3;布质版,99.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-4696-7054-6)。Before Lawrence v. Texas:同性恋社会运动的形成》(Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement)。作者:Wesley G. Phelps。Jack and Doris Smothers Series in Texas History, Life, and Culture.(奥斯汀:德克萨斯大学出版社,2023 年。第 x 页,第 292 页。34.95美元,ISBN 978-1-4773-2232-1)。最近,我作为威廉玛丽学院的教师代表之一,参加了为新录取学生的家长和朋友举办的 "亲和小组 "早餐会。这个 "亲和小组 "的对象是孩子被认定为 LGBTQ+ 的家庭。与会人员表达最多的问题(在很多方面也是最大的恐惧)是他们的孩子在威廉玛丽学院是否安全。当我要求他们进一步说明这个问题时,他们的重点不是他们的孩子在大学里是否 "安全",而是他们的同性恋孩子在 "南方 "是否 "安全"。我不能责怪他们的假设,即美国东南部--"美国南方"--可能不太欢迎他们的同性恋孩子。在我们当前的文化氛围中,各州立法机构正在通过越来越多的法律来规范妇女和青年(尤其是变性青年)的身体,而美国东南部各州无疑在其中一些措施上走在了前列。1 尽管如此,随着我们交谈的深入,很明显 [第 581 页完] ,他们认为南方可能会对他们的孩子造成危险的推断也是基于他们真诚的信念,即南方没有什么同性恋--那是同性恋者逃离而不是前往的地区,那是 LGBTQ+ 文化从未有机会发展的地区,即使尝试发展也会被扼杀。在过去二十多年里,我们目睹了大量书籍、文章和数字项目(以及其他在线和印刷出版物)对 "南方同性恋者 "进行研究和叙事,因此这种假设似乎更有问题。2 在这些作品中,玛丽-L-格雷(Mary L. Gray)对阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州、西弗吉尼亚州和田纳西州的研究《走出乡村》(Out in the Country)发现,威廉与玛丽家族的假设有一定道理。然而,格雷也发现了一些反驳的证据,例如,在沃尔玛工作的一位朋友的协助下,半打同性恋高中生即兴举办了沃尔玛变装舞会。这些舞会持续了将近一年,后来被当地政府和沃尔玛管理层叫停。格雷在她的人种学研究中还发现,"亲属关系 "往往转化为对某些人的保护,即使他们的非正常性别和/或性身份违背了现有的基于宗教的行为标准。在这里,格雷认为,广义上的个人家庭关系意味着 "亲属 "有时会介入惩罚者和作为惩罚对象的亲族之间。3 此外,这些家庭认为 "圣经地带"(一位家长使用的术语)是同性恋者无法生长的地方,这种推测可能也 [第 582 页完] 有一定道理。然而,格雷戈里-萨曼莎-罗森塔尔(Gregory Samantha Rosenthal)最近出版的专著《生活的同性恋历史》(Living Queer History)记录了弗吉尼亚州罗阿诺克市(Roanoke)长期存在的、相当明显的同性恋社区和文化。罗森塔尔详细介绍了她和罗诺克学院的学生八年来与来自罗诺克当地同性恋社区的个人开展的合作工作--这项工作是由一些同性恋者发起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Yes, There Is a "Quare"/Queer South!: A Review Essay
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Yes, There Is a “Quare”/Queer South!: A Review Essay
  • Leisa D. Meyer (bio)
The Real Rainbow Row: Explorations in Charleston’s LGBTQ History. By Harlan Greene. (Charleston, S.C.: Evening Post Books, 2022. Pp. xiv, 337. Paper, $34.95, ISBN 978-1-929647-76-7.) Drastic Dykes and Accidental Activists: Queer Women in the Urban South. By La Shonda Mims. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. xviii, 237. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7055-3; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7054-6.) Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement. By Wesley G. Phelps. Jack and Doris Smothers Series in Texas History, Life, and Culture. (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2023. Pp. x, 292. $34.95, ISBN 978-1-4773-2232-1.)

Recently I was one of the faculty representing William & Mary at an “affinity group” breakfast for parents and friends of newly admitted students. This particular affinity group was for families whose children identified as LGBTQ+. The most frequent question (and, in many ways, the biggest fear) expressed by those attending was whether their child would be safe at William & Mary. When I asked them to expand on the question, their focus was not if their child would be “safe” at college, but rather if their queer child would be “safe” in “the South.” I cannot blame them for the assumption they were making, that the southeastern United States—the “American South”—was likely to be less welcoming of their queer children. In our current cultural moment, when there is an ever-expanding number of laws being passed in state legislatures focused on regulating the bodies of women and youths (and particularly trans youths), the states occupying the southeastern portion of the United States are certainly leading the way on some of these measures.1 That said, as we spoke more, it became clear [End Page 581] that their presumption that the South might be dangerous for their children was also based in their sincere belief that there was nothing queer in the South—that it is a region queer people flee from not to, and that it is a region where LGBTQ+ culture never had the opportunity to develop and was stifled if it was tried.

This presumption seems even more problematic given the explosion of books, articles, and digital projects (among other online and print publications) that we have witnessed in the last two-plus decades engaging and narrativizing the “queer South.”2 Among this work is Mary L. Gray’s study on Appalachian Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee, Out in the Country, which finds some truth to the assumptions made by the William & Mary families. Yet Gray also finds evidence to push back—in, for example, the impromptu Walmart drag balls created by a half dozen queer high school students and facilitated by a friend who worked there. These balls ran for almost a year before being shut down by local authorities and Walmart management. In her ethnographic research, Gray also finds that “kinship” often translated into protection for some, even if their nonnormative gender and/or sexual identities contravened extant religiously based standards of behavior. Here Gray holds that the broadly defined familial associations of individuals meant that “kin” would sometimes intervene between those who would punish and those kinsmen and kinswomen who were the targets of retribution. Often, though, these kin protectors/allies might themselves have targeted someone else for a similar “offense.”3

Moreover, these families’ presumption that the Bible belt (a term used by one parent) was a space where nothing queer could grow might also [End Page 582] have some truth to it. Yet the recent monograph by Gregory Samantha Rosenthal, Living Queer History, documents the long-standing and quite visible queer communities and cultures in Roanoke, Virginia, a small city located on the northern edge of the Bible belt and abutting Appalachia, in what is generally understood to be one of the more conservative areas of the commonwealth. Rosenthal details the collaborative work that she and Roanoke College students have done over eight years with individuals from local Roanoke queer communities—work that was initiated by some...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
220
期刊最新文献
Faith, Race, and the Lost Cause: Confessions of a Southern Church by Christopher Alan Graham (review) Nothing More Than Freedom: The Failure of Abolition in American Law by Giuliana Perrone (review) A Man of Bad Reputation: The Murder of John Stephens and the Contested Landscape of North Carolina Reconstruction by Drew A. Swanson (review) Ruin and Resilience: Southern Literature and the Environment by Daniel Spoth (review) In the Shadows of the Big House: Twenty-First-Century Antebellum Slave Cabins and Heritage Tourism in Louisiana by Stephen Small (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1