失去的诗歌:朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《浪漫与当代哀歌》(评论

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AMERICAN IMAGO Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/aim.2024.a932383
Dawn Skorczewski
{"title":"失去的诗歌:朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《浪漫与当代哀歌》(评论","authors":"Dawn Skorczewski","doi":"10.1353/aim.2024.a932383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dawn Skorczewski (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <p>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by poet and critic Judith Harris contributes to studies of the elegy as a genre and to psychoanalytic interpretations of literature. Harris, a poet with a Ph.D. in literature who has published three impressive collections of poetry and a critical volume Signifying Pain (2012), is a rigorous and innovative reader. She addresses the usual suspects in her study: William Wordsworth, John Keats, and Sylvia Plath, as well as lesser-known voices such as Jane Kenyon, Edward Hirsch, and other contemporary poets. This volume is intelligent, probing, and elegant. Harris teaches us to appreciate the poems on the level of genre and line and highlights the theoretical contribution to literary and psychoanalytic studies.</p> <p>Central to the book is the concept of interiority, particularly the question of the grieving speaker's inner life and its external representation in the container of the poem. She questions how the elegy as an externalized form can provide its own source of inner consolation and whether the poem can attest to the relationship between speaker and beloved. Harris also ponders the elegy's extension to the collective experience of loss. In each chapter, Harris explores a distinct psychoanalytic theory, discussing a new poet (or poets) and introducing a novel perspective each time. Her style of writing is clear and engaging, and the depth of her analysis and theoretical arguments is impressive. Throughout the volume, Harris manages a remarkable balance between explication and theory.</p> <p>The introduction explores psychoanalytic theory from Freud to Lacan to Derrida and argues for understanding the elegy as a form that interrogates interiority and interconnection. She questions how the elegy can serve as a form of consolation for those who refuse it. For Harris, the elegy moves in three directions: the first allows the speaker to define themselves <strong>[End Page 297]</strong> through the relationship with the deceased, the second permits the speaker to remain with the deceased through the power of words, and the third serves as a vehicle for the speaker's separation from the beloved via mourning. This tripartite paradox of the elegy as coalescence, container, and conduit animates the volume.</p> <p>In chapters on Wordsworth and Keats, Harris explores the tension between coexistence, container, and conduit and shows that it is inherently religious. These elegies vacillate between the potential of transcendence in the present moment of a poem and the belief that the departed transitions to life in Heaven, leaving the living to simultaneously celebrate and mourn this journey. Wordsworth's \"We Are Seven\" (1798), for example, presents the poem as a substitute for the deceased child. On the other hand, Keats's ongoing mourning of his deceased mother and brother functions differently, as the poem functions as a site for resurrection. In discussing these two elegies, Harris identifies a foreshadowing of Freud's model involving the internalization and introjection of a lost object in the ego.</p> <p>Chapter 4 turns to the contemporary poet Jane Kenyon, a lover of Romantic poetry whose \"Having it Out With Melancholy\" (1993) enters into a dialogue with Keats's \"Ode on Melancholy\" (1819) and Freud's paper \"Mourning and Melancholia\" (1918). Kenyon's elegies lean more towards themes of depression and domestic life and question how one copes with the sense of emptiness that precedes their own death. Readers of Sylvia Plath will recognize this theme in Kenyon's poetry. However, Chapter 5 offers a fresh investigation of Plath's biography through a reading of her elegy \"Edge\" (1963), a self-directed elegy that attributes the speaker's grief to the desire to punish her mother for hindering her proper grieving of her father. Plath, whose father died when she was young, was told by her mother to move on and focus rather on her gratitude for her mother. In her poetry, this injunction against mourning ignites a drive to create. Harris draws upon Klein's theories to explore Plath's elegies as containers for exquisite rage.</p> <p>In Chapters 6 and 7, Harris focuses her analysis largely on the...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44377,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN IMAGO","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris (review)\",\"authors\":\"Dawn Skorczewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/aim.2024.a932383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Dawn Skorczewski (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies</em> by Judith Harris <p>The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by poet and critic Judith Harris contributes to studies of the elegy as a genre and to psychoanalytic interpretations of literature. Harris, a poet with a Ph.D. in literature who has published three impressive collections of poetry and a critical volume Signifying Pain (2012), is a rigorous and innovative reader. She addresses the usual suspects in her study: William Wordsworth, John Keats, and Sylvia Plath, as well as lesser-known voices such as Jane Kenyon, Edward Hirsch, and other contemporary poets. This volume is intelligent, probing, and elegant. Harris teaches us to appreciate the poems on the level of genre and line and highlights the theoretical contribution to literary and psychoanalytic studies.</p> <p>Central to the book is the concept of interiority, particularly the question of the grieving speaker's inner life and its external representation in the container of the poem. She questions how the elegy as an externalized form can provide its own source of inner consolation and whether the poem can attest to the relationship between speaker and beloved. Harris also ponders the elegy's extension to the collective experience of loss. In each chapter, Harris explores a distinct psychoanalytic theory, discussing a new poet (or poets) and introducing a novel perspective each time. Her style of writing is clear and engaging, and the depth of her analysis and theoretical arguments is impressive. Throughout the volume, Harris manages a remarkable balance between explication and theory.</p> <p>The introduction explores psychoanalytic theory from Freud to Lacan to Derrida and argues for understanding the elegy as a form that interrogates interiority and interconnection. She questions how the elegy can serve as a form of consolation for those who refuse it. For Harris, the elegy moves in three directions: the first allows the speaker to define themselves <strong>[End Page 297]</strong> through the relationship with the deceased, the second permits the speaker to remain with the deceased through the power of words, and the third serves as a vehicle for the speaker's separation from the beloved via mourning. This tripartite paradox of the elegy as coalescence, container, and conduit animates the volume.</p> <p>In chapters on Wordsworth and Keats, Harris explores the tension between coexistence, container, and conduit and shows that it is inherently religious. These elegies vacillate between the potential of transcendence in the present moment of a poem and the belief that the departed transitions to life in Heaven, leaving the living to simultaneously celebrate and mourn this journey. Wordsworth's \\\"We Are Seven\\\" (1798), for example, presents the poem as a substitute for the deceased child. On the other hand, Keats's ongoing mourning of his deceased mother and brother functions differently, as the poem functions as a site for resurrection. In discussing these two elegies, Harris identifies a foreshadowing of Freud's model involving the internalization and introjection of a lost object in the ego.</p> <p>Chapter 4 turns to the contemporary poet Jane Kenyon, a lover of Romantic poetry whose \\\"Having it Out With Melancholy\\\" (1993) enters into a dialogue with Keats's \\\"Ode on Melancholy\\\" (1819) and Freud's paper \\\"Mourning and Melancholia\\\" (1918). Kenyon's elegies lean more towards themes of depression and domestic life and question how one copes with the sense of emptiness that precedes their own death. Readers of Sylvia Plath will recognize this theme in Kenyon's poetry. However, Chapter 5 offers a fresh investigation of Plath's biography through a reading of her elegy \\\"Edge\\\" (1963), a self-directed elegy that attributes the speaker's grief to the desire to punish her mother for hindering her proper grieving of her father. Plath, whose father died when she was young, was told by her mother to move on and focus rather on her gratitude for her mother. In her poetry, this injunction against mourning ignites a drive to create. Harris draws upon Klein's theories to explore Plath's elegies as containers for exquisite rage.</p> <p>In Chapters 6 and 7, Harris focuses her analysis largely on the...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN IMAGO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN IMAGO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2024.a932383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 失去的诗歌:朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《失去的诗歌:浪漫与当代哀歌》(The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris Dawn Skorczewski)(简历):朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的《失去之诗:浪漫与当代哀歌》(The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies):诗人兼评论家朱迪斯-哈里斯(Judith Harris)的这本《失去的诗歌:浪漫主义和当代哀歌》为哀歌这一体裁的研究和文学的精神分析解释做出了贡献。哈里斯是一位拥有文学博士学位的诗人,出版过三部令人印象深刻的诗集和一本评论集《疼痛的象征》(Signifying Pain,2012 年),是一位严谨而富有创新精神的读者。她在研究中涉及了一些常见的人物:威廉-华兹华斯(William Wordsworth)、约翰-济慈(John Keats)和西尔维娅-普拉斯(Sylvia Plath),以及鲜为人知的简-凯尼恩(Jane Kenyon)、爱德华-赫希(Edward Hirsch)和其他当代诗人。这本诗集睿智、敏锐、优雅。哈里斯教我们从体裁和行文的层面来欣赏诗歌,并强调了其对文学和精神分析研究的理论贡献。本书的核心是 "内在性 "的概念,尤其是悲痛者的内心世界及其在诗歌容器中的外在表现。她质疑挽歌作为一种外化的形式,如何能提供自己内心慰藉的源泉,以及诗歌是否能证明说话者与爱人之间的关系。哈里斯还思考了挽歌对失去亲人的集体体验的延伸。在每一章中,哈里斯都会探讨一种独特的精神分析理论,讨论一位(或多位)新诗人,每次都会引入一种新的视角。她的写作风格清晰而引人入胜,其分析和理论论证的深度令人印象深刻。在整本书中,哈里斯在阐述与理论之间取得了出色的平衡。导言探讨了从弗洛伊德到拉康再到德里达的精神分析理论,并主张将挽歌理解为一种拷问内在性和相互联系的形式。她质疑挽歌如何能成为那些拒绝挽歌的人的一种安慰形式。在哈里斯看来,挽歌有三个方向:第一个方向是让说话者通过与逝者的关系来定义自己 [尾页 297];第二个方向是让说话者通过语言的力量与逝者保持联系;第三个方向是作为说话者通过哀悼与爱人分离的载体。挽歌作为凝聚、容器和管道的三重悖论使这本书充满活力。在关于华兹华斯和济慈的章节中,哈里斯探讨了共存、容器和管道之间的紧张关系,并表明这种紧张关系具有内在的宗教性。这些挽歌在诗歌当下的超越潜能与逝者将升入天堂的信念之间徘徊,让生者同时庆祝和哀悼这一旅程。例如,华兹华斯的《我们七岁》(1798 年)将诗歌作为逝去孩子的替代品。另一方面,济慈对亡母和亡兄的持续哀悼则发挥了不同的作用,诗歌成为了复活的场所。在讨论这两首挽歌时,哈里斯发现了弗洛伊德模式的先兆,即在自我中对失去的对象进行内化和投射。第四章转向当代诗人简-凯尼恩(Jane Kenyon),她是浪漫主义诗歌的爱好者,她的《与忧郁过不去》(1993 年)与济慈的《忧郁颂》(1819 年)和弗洛伊德的论文《哀悼与忧郁症》(1918 年)展开了对话。凯尼恩的挽歌更倾向于抑郁和家庭生活的主题,并质疑一个人如何应对自己死亡前的空虚感。研究西尔维娅-普拉斯(Sylvia Plath)的读者会在凯尼恩的诗歌中发现这一主题。然而,第 5 章通过对普拉斯的挽歌《边缘》(1963 年)的解读,对她的传记进行了全新的探究,这是一首自我引导的挽歌。普拉斯的父亲在她很小的时候就去世了,她的母亲告诉她要向前看,把注意力集中在对母亲的感激上。在她的诗歌中,这种反对哀悼的禁令点燃了创作的动力。哈里斯借鉴克莱因的理论,将普拉斯的挽歌视为精致愤怒的容器。在第 6 章和第 7 章中,哈里斯的分析主要集中在普拉斯的挽歌中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris
  • Dawn Skorczewski (bio)
The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by Judith Harris

The Poetry of Loss: Romantic and Contemporary Elegies by poet and critic Judith Harris contributes to studies of the elegy as a genre and to psychoanalytic interpretations of literature. Harris, a poet with a Ph.D. in literature who has published three impressive collections of poetry and a critical volume Signifying Pain (2012), is a rigorous and innovative reader. She addresses the usual suspects in her study: William Wordsworth, John Keats, and Sylvia Plath, as well as lesser-known voices such as Jane Kenyon, Edward Hirsch, and other contemporary poets. This volume is intelligent, probing, and elegant. Harris teaches us to appreciate the poems on the level of genre and line and highlights the theoretical contribution to literary and psychoanalytic studies.

Central to the book is the concept of interiority, particularly the question of the grieving speaker's inner life and its external representation in the container of the poem. She questions how the elegy as an externalized form can provide its own source of inner consolation and whether the poem can attest to the relationship between speaker and beloved. Harris also ponders the elegy's extension to the collective experience of loss. In each chapter, Harris explores a distinct psychoanalytic theory, discussing a new poet (or poets) and introducing a novel perspective each time. Her style of writing is clear and engaging, and the depth of her analysis and theoretical arguments is impressive. Throughout the volume, Harris manages a remarkable balance between explication and theory.

The introduction explores psychoanalytic theory from Freud to Lacan to Derrida and argues for understanding the elegy as a form that interrogates interiority and interconnection. She questions how the elegy can serve as a form of consolation for those who refuse it. For Harris, the elegy moves in three directions: the first allows the speaker to define themselves [End Page 297] through the relationship with the deceased, the second permits the speaker to remain with the deceased through the power of words, and the third serves as a vehicle for the speaker's separation from the beloved via mourning. This tripartite paradox of the elegy as coalescence, container, and conduit animates the volume.

In chapters on Wordsworth and Keats, Harris explores the tension between coexistence, container, and conduit and shows that it is inherently religious. These elegies vacillate between the potential of transcendence in the present moment of a poem and the belief that the departed transitions to life in Heaven, leaving the living to simultaneously celebrate and mourn this journey. Wordsworth's "We Are Seven" (1798), for example, presents the poem as a substitute for the deceased child. On the other hand, Keats's ongoing mourning of his deceased mother and brother functions differently, as the poem functions as a site for resurrection. In discussing these two elegies, Harris identifies a foreshadowing of Freud's model involving the internalization and introjection of a lost object in the ego.

Chapter 4 turns to the contemporary poet Jane Kenyon, a lover of Romantic poetry whose "Having it Out With Melancholy" (1993) enters into a dialogue with Keats's "Ode on Melancholy" (1819) and Freud's paper "Mourning and Melancholia" (1918). Kenyon's elegies lean more towards themes of depression and domestic life and question how one copes with the sense of emptiness that precedes their own death. Readers of Sylvia Plath will recognize this theme in Kenyon's poetry. However, Chapter 5 offers a fresh investigation of Plath's biography through a reading of her elegy "Edge" (1963), a self-directed elegy that attributes the speaker's grief to the desire to punish her mother for hindering her proper grieving of her father. Plath, whose father died when she was young, was told by her mother to move on and focus rather on her gratitude for her mother. In her poetry, this injunction against mourning ignites a drive to create. Harris draws upon Klein's theories to explore Plath's elegies as containers for exquisite rage.

In Chapters 6 and 7, Harris focuses her analysis largely on the...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMERICAN IMAGO
AMERICAN IMAGO HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Founded in 1939 by Sigmund Freud and Hanns Sachs, AMERICAN IMAGO is the preeminent scholarly journal of psychoanalysis. Appearing quarterly, AMERICAN IMAGO publishes innovative articles on the history and theory of psychoanalysis as well as on the reciprocal relations between psychoanalysis and the broad range of disciplines that constitute the human sciences. Since 2001, the journal has been edited by Peter L. Rudnytsky, who has made each issue a "special issue" and introduced a topical book review section, with a guest editor for every Fall issue.
期刊最新文献
"Anything of Note": Recovering "Lost Life" in the Psychoanalytic Archive Freud and Marie Bonaparte's Correspondence (1925–1939): An Intimate Relationship Nabokov and Freud: Solus Rex vs Oedipus Rex Understanding the Phenomenon of Negative Myths The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Psychoanalysis ed. by Vera J. Camden (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1