慢性小袋炎患者使用维多珠单抗后的粘膜愈合:EARNEST:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.037
Vipul Jairath , Brian G. Feagan , Mark S. Silverberg , Silvio Danese , Paolo Gionchetti , Mark Löwenberg , Brian Bressler , Marc Ferrante , Ailsa Hart , Dirk Lindner , Armella Escher , Stephen Jones , Bo Shen , Simon Travis
{"title":"慢性小袋炎患者使用维多珠单抗后的粘膜愈合:EARNEST:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Vipul Jairath ,&nbsp;Brian G. Feagan ,&nbsp;Mark S. Silverberg ,&nbsp;Silvio Danese ,&nbsp;Paolo Gionchetti ,&nbsp;Mark Löwenberg ,&nbsp;Brian Bressler ,&nbsp;Marc Ferrante ,&nbsp;Ailsa Hart ,&nbsp;Dirk Lindner ,&nbsp;Armella Escher ,&nbsp;Stephen Jones ,&nbsp;Bo Shen ,&nbsp;Simon Travis","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>Vedolizumab is indicated for the treatment of chronic pouchitis in the European Union. We assessed whether vedolizumab induced mucosal healing (MH) and if MH was associated with clinical improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>EARNEST, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, evaluated vedolizumab efficacy and safety in adults with chronic pouchitis. Centrally read endoscopic and histologic evaluation was performed at baseline, Week (W)14, and W34. Ulcer count, adapted Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease in the pouch, and Pouchitis Disease Activity Index histologic component were evaluated. Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 were compared by MH status at W14.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following treatment, mean (standard deviation) number of ulcers in vedolizumab-treated patients reduced from 15.1 (16.4) to 5.0 (4.9) at W14 and 2.7 (3.2) at W34 versus placebo-treated patients with corresponding values of 11.8 (11.3), 13.4 (18.4), and 9.7 (13.8) (vedolizumab vs placebo difference [95% confidence interval]: W14: −8.4 [−14.3, −2.6]; W34: −7.0 [−12.0, −2.0]). More patients receiving vedolizumab versus placebo achieved reduction in ulcerated pouch surface area (W14: 52.4% vs 20.0%; difference, 32.4 percentage points [p.p] [9.7, 51.4]; W34: 52.1% vs 12.9%; difference, 40.2p.p [15.6, 60.3]), absence of ulceration (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease remission (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), and MH (W14: 16.7% vs 2.5%; difference, 14.2p.p [1.9, 26.4]). Patients with MH at W14 had higher rates of Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 than those without.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Vedolizumab induced endoscopic improvements in patients with chronic pouchitis, which was associated with improved outcomes at W34, particularly in patients achieving MH at W14. (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> number, NCT02790138.)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 321-330.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mucosal Healing With Vedolizumab in Patients With Chronic Pouchitis: EARNEST, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Vipul Jairath ,&nbsp;Brian G. Feagan ,&nbsp;Mark S. Silverberg ,&nbsp;Silvio Danese ,&nbsp;Paolo Gionchetti ,&nbsp;Mark Löwenberg ,&nbsp;Brian Bressler ,&nbsp;Marc Ferrante ,&nbsp;Ailsa Hart ,&nbsp;Dirk Lindner ,&nbsp;Armella Escher ,&nbsp;Stephen Jones ,&nbsp;Bo Shen ,&nbsp;Simon Travis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div>Vedolizumab is indicated for the treatment of chronic pouchitis in the European Union. We assessed whether vedolizumab induced mucosal healing (MH) and if MH was associated with clinical improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>EARNEST, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, evaluated vedolizumab efficacy and safety in adults with chronic pouchitis. Centrally read endoscopic and histologic evaluation was performed at baseline, Week (W)14, and W34. Ulcer count, adapted Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease in the pouch, and Pouchitis Disease Activity Index histologic component were evaluated. Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 were compared by MH status at W14.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following treatment, mean (standard deviation) number of ulcers in vedolizumab-treated patients reduced from 15.1 (16.4) to 5.0 (4.9) at W14 and 2.7 (3.2) at W34 versus placebo-treated patients with corresponding values of 11.8 (11.3), 13.4 (18.4), and 9.7 (13.8) (vedolizumab vs placebo difference [95% confidence interval]: W14: −8.4 [−14.3, −2.6]; W34: −7.0 [−12.0, −2.0]). More patients receiving vedolizumab versus placebo achieved reduction in ulcerated pouch surface area (W14: 52.4% vs 20.0%; difference, 32.4 percentage points [p.p] [9.7, 51.4]; W34: 52.1% vs 12.9%; difference, 40.2p.p [15.6, 60.3]), absence of ulceration (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease remission (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), and MH (W14: 16.7% vs 2.5%; difference, 14.2p.p [1.9, 26.4]). Patients with MH at W14 had higher rates of Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 than those without.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Vedolizumab induced endoscopic improvements in patients with chronic pouchitis, which was associated with improved outcomes at W34, particularly in patients achieving MH at W14. (<span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> number, NCT02790138.)</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 321-330.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524006360\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524006360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:在欧盟,维多珠单抗适用于治疗慢性胃袋炎。我们评估了维多珠单抗是否能诱导粘膜愈合(MH),以及粘膜愈合是否与临床改善相关:EARNEST是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估了维多珠单抗在成人慢性胃袋炎患者中的疗效和安全性。在基线、第14周和第34周进行了中央读取的内镜和组织学评估。评估内容包括溃疡数量、肠袋内克罗恩病简易内镜评分(SES-CD)以及肠袋炎疾病活动指数(PDAI)组织学成分。根据W14和W34时的MH状况,比较了PDAI和炎症性肠病问卷(IBDQ)在W14和W34时的缓解情况:治疗后,与安慰剂治疗患者相比,维多珠单抗治疗患者的平均(标清)溃疡数在W14时从15.1(16.4)减少到5.0(4.9),在W34时减少到2.7(3.2),相应值分别为11.8(11.3)、13.4(18.4)和9.7(13.8)(维多珠单抗与安慰剂的差异[95% CI]:W14:-8.4 [95%CI]):W14:-8.4 [-14.3,-2.6];W34:-7.0 [-12.0,-2.0])。与安慰剂相比,更多接受维多珠单抗治疗的患者溃疡袋表面积减少(W14:52.4% vs 20.0%;差异32.4p.p [9.7,51.4];W34:52.1% vs 12.9%;差异40.2p.p [15.6,60.3]),无溃疡(W14:23.8% vs 7.5%;差异16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6];W34:34.4% vs 15.6%;差异 18.8p.p [-2.0, 39.5])、SES-CD 缓解(W14:23.8% vs 7.5%;差异 16.3p.p[1.1,31.6];W34:34.4% vs 15.6%;差异18.8p.p[-2.0,39.5])和MH(W14:16.7% vs 2.5%;差异14.2p.p[1.9,26.4])。W14时患有MH的患者在W14和W34时的PDAI和IBDQ缓解率高于未患有MH的患者:结论:维多珠单抗可改善慢性胃袋炎患者的内镜症状,这与W34时的预后改善有关,尤其是在W14时达到MH的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mucosal Healing With Vedolizumab in Patients With Chronic Pouchitis: EARNEST, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background & Aims

Vedolizumab is indicated for the treatment of chronic pouchitis in the European Union. We assessed whether vedolizumab induced mucosal healing (MH) and if MH was associated with clinical improvements.

Methods

EARNEST, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, evaluated vedolizumab efficacy and safety in adults with chronic pouchitis. Centrally read endoscopic and histologic evaluation was performed at baseline, Week (W)14, and W34. Ulcer count, adapted Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease in the pouch, and Pouchitis Disease Activity Index histologic component were evaluated. Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 were compared by MH status at W14.

Results

Following treatment, mean (standard deviation) number of ulcers in vedolizumab-treated patients reduced from 15.1 (16.4) to 5.0 (4.9) at W14 and 2.7 (3.2) at W34 versus placebo-treated patients with corresponding values of 11.8 (11.3), 13.4 (18.4), and 9.7 (13.8) (vedolizumab vs placebo difference [95% confidence interval]: W14: −8.4 [−14.3, −2.6]; W34: −7.0 [−12.0, −2.0]). More patients receiving vedolizumab versus placebo achieved reduction in ulcerated pouch surface area (W14: 52.4% vs 20.0%; difference, 32.4 percentage points [p.p] [9.7, 51.4]; W34: 52.1% vs 12.9%; difference, 40.2p.p [15.6, 60.3]), absence of ulceration (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease remission (W14: 23.8% vs 7.5%; difference, 16.3p.p [1.1, 31.6]; W34: 34.4% vs 15.6%; difference, 18.8p.p [−2.0, 39.5]), and MH (W14: 16.7% vs 2.5%; difference, 14.2p.p [1.9, 26.4]). Patients with MH at W14 had higher rates of Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission at W14 and W34 than those without.

Conclusions

Vedolizumab induced endoscopic improvements in patients with chronic pouchitis, which was associated with improved outcomes at W34, particularly in patients achieving MH at W14. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02790138.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: a 4-Year, Phase 3, Open-Label Study. Proteomics guided biomarker discovery, validation, and pathway perturbation in infection-related acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Association of Alcohol and Incremental Cardiometabolic Risk Factors with Liver Disease: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Extended Risankizumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease Who Did Not Achieve Clinical Response to Induction Treatment. Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1