制定尿失禁基础护理路径:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmae035
Marie C Luebke, Joan M Neuner, Joanna Balza, Emily R W Davidson, James A Hokanson, Sarah Marowski, Robert Corey O'Connor, Emily Schmitt, Aaron N Winn, Kathryn E Flynn
{"title":"制定尿失禁基础护理路径:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Marie C Luebke, Joan M Neuner, Joanna Balza, Emily R W Davidson, James A Hokanson, Sarah Marowski, Robert Corey O'Connor, Emily Schmitt, Aaron N Winn, Kathryn E Flynn","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While nearly 50% of adult women report at least one episode of urinary incontinence (UI), most never receive treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better integrate primary and specialty UI care, we conducted (i) an environmental scan to assess the availability of key pathway resources in primary care, (ii) interviews with primary care providers to understand barriers to care, and (iii) a pilot UI care pathway intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Environmental scan: Clinic managers from all primary care clinics within a Midwestern healthcare system were invited to participate in an interview covering the availability of clinic resources. Provider interviews: Primary care providers were invited to participate in an interview covering current practices and perceived barriers to UI care. Pilot UI care pathway: Patients who screened positive for UI were provided resources for first-line behavioral management. Pilot patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While many clinics had point-of-care urinalysis (17/21, 81%), most did not have a working bladder ultrasound (14/21, 67%) or on-site pelvic floor physical therapy (18/21, 86%). Providers (n = 5) described barriers to completing almost every step of diagnosis and treatment for UI. The most persistent barrier was lack of time. Patients (n = 15) reported several self-treatment strategies including avoiding bladder irritants (7/15, 47%) and performing Kegel exercises (4/15, 27%). Five patients (33%) requested follow-up care. At 6 months, patients reported small improvements in UI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promising results from a novel UI care pathway pilot indicate that streamlining UI care may assist primary care providers in the first-line treatment of UI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a urinary incontinence primary care pathway: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Marie C Luebke, Joan M Neuner, Joanna Balza, Emily R W Davidson, James A Hokanson, Sarah Marowski, Robert Corey O'Connor, Emily Schmitt, Aaron N Winn, Kathryn E Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmae035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While nearly 50% of adult women report at least one episode of urinary incontinence (UI), most never receive treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better integrate primary and specialty UI care, we conducted (i) an environmental scan to assess the availability of key pathway resources in primary care, (ii) interviews with primary care providers to understand barriers to care, and (iii) a pilot UI care pathway intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Environmental scan: Clinic managers from all primary care clinics within a Midwestern healthcare system were invited to participate in an interview covering the availability of clinic resources. Provider interviews: Primary care providers were invited to participate in an interview covering current practices and perceived barriers to UI care. Pilot UI care pathway: Patients who screened positive for UI were provided resources for first-line behavioral management. Pilot patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While many clinics had point-of-care urinalysis (17/21, 81%), most did not have a working bladder ultrasound (14/21, 67%) or on-site pelvic floor physical therapy (18/21, 86%). Providers (n = 5) described barriers to completing almost every step of diagnosis and treatment for UI. The most persistent barrier was lack of time. Patients (n = 15) reported several self-treatment strategies including avoiding bladder irritants (7/15, 47%) and performing Kegel exercises (4/15, 27%). Five patients (33%) requested follow-up care. At 6 months, patients reported small improvements in UI symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Promising results from a novel UI care pathway pilot indicate that streamlining UI care may assist primary care providers in the first-line treatment of UI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近 50%的成年女性报告至少有一次尿失禁:虽然近 50%的成年女性至少报告过一次尿失禁(UI),但大多数女性从未接受过治疗:为了更好地整合初级和专科尿失禁护理,我们进行了(i) 环境扫描,以评估初级护理中关键路径资源的可用性;(ii) 对初级护理提供者进行访谈,以了解护理障碍;(iii) 试点尿失禁护理路径干预:环境扫描:方法:环境扫描:邀请中西部医疗保健系统内所有初级保健诊所的诊所经理参加访谈,了解诊所资源的可用性。提供者访谈:邀请初级医疗服务提供者参加访谈,内容包括目前的做法以及对 UI 护理的认知障碍。试行尿失禁护理路径:为筛查出尿失禁阳性的患者提供一线行为管理资源。试点患者在基线、8 周和 6 个月时填写了调查问卷:虽然许多诊所都有床旁尿液分析(17/21,81%),但大多数诊所都没有可用的膀胱超声波检查(14/21,67%)或现场盆底物理治疗(18/21,86%)。医疗服务提供者(n = 5)描述了在完成 UI 诊断和治疗的几乎每一个步骤时遇到的障碍。最持久的障碍是缺乏时间。患者(15 人)报告了几种自我治疗策略,包括避免膀胱刺激物(7/15,47%)和进行凯格尔运动(4/15,27%)。五名患者(33%)要求进行后续治疗。6个月后,患者的尿失禁症状略有改善:新颖的尿失禁护理路径试点取得了可喜的成果,表明简化尿失禁护理可协助初级保健提供者对尿失禁进行一线治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a urinary incontinence primary care pathway: a mixed methods study.

Background: While nearly 50% of adult women report at least one episode of urinary incontinence (UI), most never receive treatment.

Objective: To better integrate primary and specialty UI care, we conducted (i) an environmental scan to assess the availability of key pathway resources in primary care, (ii) interviews with primary care providers to understand barriers to care, and (iii) a pilot UI care pathway intervention.

Methods: Environmental scan: Clinic managers from all primary care clinics within a Midwestern healthcare system were invited to participate in an interview covering the availability of clinic resources. Provider interviews: Primary care providers were invited to participate in an interview covering current practices and perceived barriers to UI care. Pilot UI care pathway: Patients who screened positive for UI were provided resources for first-line behavioral management. Pilot patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months.

Results: While many clinics had point-of-care urinalysis (17/21, 81%), most did not have a working bladder ultrasound (14/21, 67%) or on-site pelvic floor physical therapy (18/21, 86%). Providers (n = 5) described barriers to completing almost every step of diagnosis and treatment for UI. The most persistent barrier was lack of time. Patients (n = 15) reported several self-treatment strategies including avoiding bladder irritants (7/15, 47%) and performing Kegel exercises (4/15, 27%). Five patients (33%) requested follow-up care. At 6 months, patients reported small improvements in UI symptoms.

Conclusion: Promising results from a novel UI care pathway pilot indicate that streamlining UI care may assist primary care providers in the first-line treatment of UI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Impact of implementing primary care-based medication for opioid use disorder on provider and staff perceptions. The effect and implementation of the COVID Box, a remote patient monitoring system for patients with a COVID-19 infection in primary care: a matched cohort study. Can patient education initiatives in primary care increase patient knowledge of appropriate antibiotic use and decrease expectations for unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions? Clinical effects of accreditation in general practice: a pragmatic randomized controlled study. School absence policy and healthcare use: a difference-in-difference cohort analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1