阳性淋巴结数量而非结节外扩展和结节直径是高级别腮腺癌生存率和治疗效果的独立预测指标

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.179
Denis Brajkovic DMD, PhD , Aleksandar Kiralj DMD, PhD , Miroslav Ilic MD, DMD, PhD , Ivana Mijatov MD, PhD , Borivoj Bijelic DMD, PhD
{"title":"阳性淋巴结数量而非结节外扩展和结节直径是高级别腮腺癌生存率和治疗效果的独立预测指标","authors":"Denis Brajkovic DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Kiralj DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Miroslav Ilic MD, DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ivana Mijatov MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Borivoj Bijelic DMD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is emerging evidence that current 8<sup>th</sup> edition of the American Joint Committee staging system is not sensitive enough to predict parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The present study aimed to analyze pathological nodal factors related to survival and treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients surgically treated with PGC.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients surgically treated with PGC at the authors' institution from January 1993 to December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed high-grade parotid gland malignancy on histopathology first surgical treatment of the parotid cancer with neck dissection with curative intent at the study clinic; and sufficient data for review. The exclusion criteria were previous treatment in another institution, low-grade carcinomas, cases where neck dissection was not performed, incurable local disease and distant metastases at the time of first diagnosis, and patients lost to follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>Predictor variable comprised pathological nodal factors grouped as the number of cervical node metastases, extranodal extension (ENE), largest diameter of nodal metastasis, and involvement of parotid lymph nodes.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variables</h3><div>Outcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). OS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery to the last known hospital follow-up date or the date of death found in the hospital records or social security data. DSS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery until the last known follow-up or death from PGC reported in the patient record. Patients who died from causes other than the disease being studied are not counted in this measurement. Treatment outcome was evaluated through the occurrence of locoregional relapse of the disease or development of distant metastases. RFS was defined as the time from the date of biopsy or definitive surgery to the date of locoregional recurrence free survivalor DMFS reported in the patient record.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates were composed of a set of heterogeneous variables grouped into the following categories: demographic, pathologic, and clinical.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for each variable were calculated with univariate and multivariable Cox regression. The tatistical significance was defined at a <em>P</em> value of &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort of 112 patients included 62 males (55%) and 50 (45%) females. The mean age of the patients was 60.52 ± 15.22 years. The median follow-up time was 59 months (3-221 months). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common tumor type with the incidence of 45%. Cumulative OS for the 5-and 10-year follow-up period was 75 and 61%, respectively. Locoregional recurrences occurred with 27 patients (24%), distant metastases occurred with 25 patients (22%), and both were diagnosed with 5 patients (6%). The number of metastatic nodes was the most important nodal prognostic factor related to OS (<em>P</em> = .02; HR = 2.67; CI = 0.03-6.35), DSS (<em>P</em> = .011; HR = 2.55; CI = .61-6.83), and DMFS (<em>P</em> = .005; HR = 2.85; CI = 0.12-4.76). The presence of pathological parotid nodes was associated with poorer RFS (<em>P</em> = .015; HR = 3.45; CI = 0.25-6.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>The number of metastatic lymph nodes, instead of ENE and largest nodal diameter, was the contributing factor associated with survival and treatment outcomes of surgically treated patients with high-grade PGC. Since the main function of staging system is to predict outcomes, the significance of ENE and nodal dimension in salivary gland cancer staging system requires further clarification. An important finding in the present study was that the presence of positive parotid lymph nodes was associated to locoregional treatment failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"82 11","pages":"Pages 1456-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Number of Positive Lymph Nodes Instead of Extranodal Extension and Nodal Diameter is an Independent Predictor of Survival and Treatment Outcome of High-Grade Parotid Gland Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Denis Brajkovic DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Kiralj DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Miroslav Ilic MD, DMD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ivana Mijatov MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Borivoj Bijelic DMD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joms.2024.06.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is emerging evidence that current 8<sup>th</sup> edition of the American Joint Committee staging system is not sensitive enough to predict parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The present study aimed to analyze pathological nodal factors related to survival and treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients surgically treated with PGC.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design, Setting, Sample</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients surgically treated with PGC at the authors' institution from January 1993 to December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed high-grade parotid gland malignancy on histopathology first surgical treatment of the parotid cancer with neck dissection with curative intent at the study clinic; and sufficient data for review. The exclusion criteria were previous treatment in another institution, low-grade carcinomas, cases where neck dissection was not performed, incurable local disease and distant metastases at the time of first diagnosis, and patients lost to follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Predictor Variable</h3><div>Predictor variable comprised pathological nodal factors grouped as the number of cervical node metastases, extranodal extension (ENE), largest diameter of nodal metastasis, and involvement of parotid lymph nodes.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Variables</h3><div>Outcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). OS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery to the last known hospital follow-up date or the date of death found in the hospital records or social security data. DSS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery until the last known follow-up or death from PGC reported in the patient record. Patients who died from causes other than the disease being studied are not counted in this measurement. Treatment outcome was evaluated through the occurrence of locoregional relapse of the disease or development of distant metastases. RFS was defined as the time from the date of biopsy or definitive surgery to the date of locoregional recurrence free survivalor DMFS reported in the patient record.</div></div><div><h3>Covariates</h3><div>Covariates were composed of a set of heterogeneous variables grouped into the following categories: demographic, pathologic, and clinical.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for each variable were calculated with univariate and multivariable Cox regression. The tatistical significance was defined at a <em>P</em> value of &lt; .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort of 112 patients included 62 males (55%) and 50 (45%) females. The mean age of the patients was 60.52 ± 15.22 years. The median follow-up time was 59 months (3-221 months). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common tumor type with the incidence of 45%. Cumulative OS for the 5-and 10-year follow-up period was 75 and 61%, respectively. Locoregional recurrences occurred with 27 patients (24%), distant metastases occurred with 25 patients (22%), and both were diagnosed with 5 patients (6%). The number of metastatic nodes was the most important nodal prognostic factor related to OS (<em>P</em> = .02; HR = 2.67; CI = 0.03-6.35), DSS (<em>P</em> = .011; HR = 2.55; CI = .61-6.83), and DMFS (<em>P</em> = .005; HR = 2.85; CI = 0.12-4.76). The presence of pathological parotid nodes was associated with poorer RFS (<em>P</em> = .015; HR = 3.45; CI = 0.25-6.02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Relevance</h3><div>The number of metastatic lymph nodes, instead of ENE and largest nodal diameter, was the contributing factor associated with survival and treatment outcomes of surgically treated patients with high-grade PGC. Since the main function of staging system is to predict outcomes, the significance of ENE and nodal dimension in salivary gland cancer staging system requires further clarification. An important finding in the present study was that the presence of positive parotid lymph nodes was associated to locoregional treatment failure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1456-1474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124005895\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239124005895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有新证据表明,目前的第8版美国联合委员会分期系统对预测腮腺癌(PGC)的生存结果不够敏感。研究目的:本研究旨在分析一组接受手术治疗的PGC患者中与生存和治疗结果相关的病理结节因素:我们对 1993 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在作者所在机构接受 PGC 手术治疗的连续患者进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入标准如下:组织病理学确诊为高级别腮腺恶性肿瘤;在研究诊所首次接受腮腺癌手术治疗,并以治愈为目的进行了颈部切除术;有足够的数据可供回顾。排除标准包括:曾在其他机构接受过治疗、低分化癌、未进行颈部切除术、首次确诊时存在无法治愈的局部疾病和远处转移以及失去随访的患者:预测变量包括病理结节因素,分为颈部结节转移数量、结节外扩展(ENE)、结节转移的最大直径和腮腺淋巴结受累:评估的结果包括总生存期(OS)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)、无复发生存期(RFS)、无局部复发生存期和无远处转移生存期(DMFS)。OS的计算时间为活检或明确手术(S)当日至最后已知的医院随访日期或在医院记录或社会保障数据中找到的死亡日期。DSS的计算时间为活检或明确手术(S)当日至最后一次已知的随访日期或患者病历中报告的PGC死亡日期。因研究疾病以外的其他原因死亡的患者不计入本次测量。治疗结果通过疾病的局部复发或远处转移来评估。RFS是指从活检或确定S之日起至患者病历中报告的无局部复发生存期或DMFS之日止的时间:协变量由一组异质性变量组成,分为以下几类:人口统计学变量、病理学变量和临床变量:通过单变量和多变量 Cox 回归计算每个变量的未调整和调整后危险比。统计显著性的定义是 P 值为结果:112 名患者中有 62 名男性(55%)和 50 名女性(45%)。患者的平均年龄为 60.52 ± 15.22 岁。中位随访时间为 59 个月(3-221 个月)。腺样囊性癌是最常见的肿瘤类型,发病率为45%。随访5年和10年的累积OS分别为75%和61%。27名患者(24%)出现局部复发,25名患者(22%)出现远处转移,5名患者(6%)同时确诊为局部复发和远处转移。转移性结节的数量是与OS(P = .02;HR = 2.67;CI = 0.03-6.35)、DSS(P = .011;HR = 2.55;CI = .61-6.83)和DMFS(P = .005;HR = 2.85;CI = 0.12-4.76)相关的最重要的结节预后因素。病理腮腺结节的存在与较差的RFS相关(P = .015;HR = 3.45;CI = 0.25-6.02):转移淋巴结的数量,而不是ENE和最大结节直径,是与手术治疗的高级别PGC患者的生存和治疗效果相关的因素。由于分期系统的主要功能是预测预后,因此ENE和结节直径在唾液腺癌分期系统中的意义需要进一步明确。本研究的一个重要发现是,腮腺淋巴结阳性与局部治疗失败有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Number of Positive Lymph Nodes Instead of Extranodal Extension and Nodal Diameter is an Independent Predictor of Survival and Treatment Outcome of High-Grade Parotid Gland Carcinoma

Background

There is emerging evidence that current 8th edition of the American Joint Committee staging system is not sensitive enough to predict parotid gland carcinoma (PGC) survival outcomes.

Purpose

The present study aimed to analyze pathological nodal factors related to survival and treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients surgically treated with PGC.

Study Design, Setting, Sample

We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients surgically treated with PGC at the authors' institution from January 1993 to December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed high-grade parotid gland malignancy on histopathology first surgical treatment of the parotid cancer with neck dissection with curative intent at the study clinic; and sufficient data for review. The exclusion criteria were previous treatment in another institution, low-grade carcinomas, cases where neck dissection was not performed, incurable local disease and distant metastases at the time of first diagnosis, and patients lost to follow-up.

Predictor Variable

Predictor variable comprised pathological nodal factors grouped as the number of cervical node metastases, extranodal extension (ENE), largest diameter of nodal metastasis, and involvement of parotid lymph nodes.

Main Outcome Variables

Outcomes evaluated were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). OS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery to the last known hospital follow-up date or the date of death found in the hospital records or social security data. DSS was calculated from the day of biopsy or definitive surgery until the last known follow-up or death from PGC reported in the patient record. Patients who died from causes other than the disease being studied are not counted in this measurement. Treatment outcome was evaluated through the occurrence of locoregional relapse of the disease or development of distant metastases. RFS was defined as the time from the date of biopsy or definitive surgery to the date of locoregional recurrence free survivalor DMFS reported in the patient record.

Covariates

Covariates were composed of a set of heterogeneous variables grouped into the following categories: demographic, pathologic, and clinical.

Analyses

Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios for each variable were calculated with univariate and multivariable Cox regression. The tatistical significance was defined at a P value of < .05.

Results

The cohort of 112 patients included 62 males (55%) and 50 (45%) females. The mean age of the patients was 60.52 ± 15.22 years. The median follow-up time was 59 months (3-221 months). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common tumor type with the incidence of 45%. Cumulative OS for the 5-and 10-year follow-up period was 75 and 61%, respectively. Locoregional recurrences occurred with 27 patients (24%), distant metastases occurred with 25 patients (22%), and both were diagnosed with 5 patients (6%). The number of metastatic nodes was the most important nodal prognostic factor related to OS (P = .02; HR = 2.67; CI = 0.03-6.35), DSS (P = .011; HR = 2.55; CI = .61-6.83), and DMFS (P = .005; HR = 2.85; CI = 0.12-4.76). The presence of pathological parotid nodes was associated with poorer RFS (P = .015; HR = 3.45; CI = 0.25-6.02).

Conclusion and Relevance

The number of metastatic lymph nodes, instead of ENE and largest nodal diameter, was the contributing factor associated with survival and treatment outcomes of surgically treated patients with high-grade PGC. Since the main function of staging system is to predict outcomes, the significance of ENE and nodal dimension in salivary gland cancer staging system requires further clarification. An important finding in the present study was that the presence of positive parotid lymph nodes was associated to locoregional treatment failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
期刊最新文献
Does Varying Platelet-Rich Fibrin Centri̇fugati̇on Protocols Enhance New Bone Formati̇on in Extracti̇on Site? Fluorescence Visualization-Guided Surgery Improves Local Control for Mandibular Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Do Postoperative Surgeon Phone Calls Improve Outcomes Following Mandibular Fracture Repair? Geographic Trends in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residency Match. What is the Minimal Perceptible Change for the Dimensional Alteration of Facial Structures in the Frontal View?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1