使用 Glimpse 工具对低覆盖率古 DNA 的基因型推算进行评估。

IF 2.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Mammalian Genome Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1007/s00335-024-10053-4
Hande Çubukcu, Gülşah Merve Kılınç
{"title":"使用 Glimpse 工具对低覆盖率古 DNA 的基因型推算进行评估。","authors":"Hande Çubukcu, Gülşah Merve Kılınç","doi":"10.1007/s00335-024-10053-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ancient DNA provides a unique frame for directly studying human population genetics in time and space. Still, since most of the ancient genomic data is low coverage, analysis is confronted with a low number of SNPs, genotype uncertainties, and reference-bias. Here, we for the first time benchmark the two distinct versions of Glimpse tools on 120 ancient human genomes from Eurasia including those largely from previously under-evaluated regions and compare the performance of genotype imputation with de facto analysis approaches for low coverage genomic data analysis. We further investigate the impact of two distinct reference panels on imputation accuracy for low coverage genomic data. We compute accuracy statistics and perform PCA and f<sub>4</sub>-statistics to explore the behaviour of genotype imputation on low coverage data regarding (i)two versions of Glimpse, (ii)two reference panels, (iii)four post-imputation filters and coverages, as well as (iv)data type and geographical origin of the samples on the analyses. Our results reveal that even for 0.1X coverage ancient human genomes, genotype imputation using Glimpse-v2 is suitable. Additionally, using the 1000 Genomes merged with Human Genome Diversity Panel improves the accuracy of imputation for the rare variants with low MAF, which might be important not only for ancient genomics but also for modern human genomic studies based on low coverage data and for haplotype-based analysis. Most importantly, we reveal that genotype imputation of low coverage ancient human genomes reduces the genetic affinity of the samples towards human reference genome. Through solving one of the most challenging biases in data analysis, so-called reference bias, genotype imputation using Glimpse v2 is promising for low coverage ancient human genomic data analysis and for rare-variant-based and haplotype-based analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18259,"journal":{"name":"Mammalian Genome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of genotype imputation using Glimpse tools on low coverage ancient DNA.\",\"authors\":\"Hande Çubukcu, Gülşah Merve Kılınç\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00335-024-10053-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ancient DNA provides a unique frame for directly studying human population genetics in time and space. Still, since most of the ancient genomic data is low coverage, analysis is confronted with a low number of SNPs, genotype uncertainties, and reference-bias. Here, we for the first time benchmark the two distinct versions of Glimpse tools on 120 ancient human genomes from Eurasia including those largely from previously under-evaluated regions and compare the performance of genotype imputation with de facto analysis approaches for low coverage genomic data analysis. We further investigate the impact of two distinct reference panels on imputation accuracy for low coverage genomic data. We compute accuracy statistics and perform PCA and f<sub>4</sub>-statistics to explore the behaviour of genotype imputation on low coverage data regarding (i)two versions of Glimpse, (ii)two reference panels, (iii)four post-imputation filters and coverages, as well as (iv)data type and geographical origin of the samples on the analyses. Our results reveal that even for 0.1X coverage ancient human genomes, genotype imputation using Glimpse-v2 is suitable. Additionally, using the 1000 Genomes merged with Human Genome Diversity Panel improves the accuracy of imputation for the rare variants with low MAF, which might be important not only for ancient genomics but also for modern human genomic studies based on low coverage data and for haplotype-based analysis. Most importantly, we reveal that genotype imputation of low coverage ancient human genomes reduces the genetic affinity of the samples towards human reference genome. Through solving one of the most challenging biases in data analysis, so-called reference bias, genotype imputation using Glimpse v2 is promising for low coverage ancient human genomic data analysis and for rare-variant-based and haplotype-based analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mammalian Genome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mammalian Genome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-024-10053-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammalian Genome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-024-10053-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古代 DNA 为直接研究人类群体遗传学的时间和空间提供了一个独特的框架。不过,由于大部分古人类基因组数据的覆盖率较低,因此在分析过程中会遇到 SNP 数量少、基因型不确定和参考偏差等问题。在此,我们首次在欧亚大陆的 120 个古人类基因组上对两个不同版本的 Glimpse 工具进行了基准测试,包括那些主要来自以前未得到充分评估的地区的基因组,并比较了基因型估算与事实分析方法在低覆盖率基因组数据分析中的性能。我们进一步研究了两个不同的参考面板对低覆盖率基因组数据估算准确性的影响。我们计算了准确性统计量,并执行了 PCA 和 f4 统计,以探索基因型估算在低覆盖率数据上的表现,其中涉及 (i) 两个版本的 Glimpse、(ii) 两个参考面板、(iii) 四种输入后过滤器和覆盖率,以及 (iv) 数据类型和分析样本的地理来源。我们的结果表明,即使对于 0.1 倍覆盖率的古人类基因组,使用 Glimpse-v2 进行基因型归约也是合适的。此外,使用与人类基因组多样性面板合并的 1000 个基因组提高了低 MAF 罕见变异的估算准确性,这不仅对古代基因组学很重要,对基于低覆盖率数据的现代人类基因组研究和基于单倍型的分析也很重要。最重要的是,我们发现低覆盖率古人类基因组的基因型归约会降低样本与人类参考基因组的遗传亲和性。通过解决数据分析中最具挑战性的偏差之一,即所谓的参考偏差,使用 Glimpse v2 进行基因型归因有望用于低覆盖率古人类基因组数据分析以及基于稀有变异和单体型的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of genotype imputation using Glimpse tools on low coverage ancient DNA.

Ancient DNA provides a unique frame for directly studying human population genetics in time and space. Still, since most of the ancient genomic data is low coverage, analysis is confronted with a low number of SNPs, genotype uncertainties, and reference-bias. Here, we for the first time benchmark the two distinct versions of Glimpse tools on 120 ancient human genomes from Eurasia including those largely from previously under-evaluated regions and compare the performance of genotype imputation with de facto analysis approaches for low coverage genomic data analysis. We further investigate the impact of two distinct reference panels on imputation accuracy for low coverage genomic data. We compute accuracy statistics and perform PCA and f4-statistics to explore the behaviour of genotype imputation on low coverage data regarding (i)two versions of Glimpse, (ii)two reference panels, (iii)four post-imputation filters and coverages, as well as (iv)data type and geographical origin of the samples on the analyses. Our results reveal that even for 0.1X coverage ancient human genomes, genotype imputation using Glimpse-v2 is suitable. Additionally, using the 1000 Genomes merged with Human Genome Diversity Panel improves the accuracy of imputation for the rare variants with low MAF, which might be important not only for ancient genomics but also for modern human genomic studies based on low coverage data and for haplotype-based analysis. Most importantly, we reveal that genotype imputation of low coverage ancient human genomes reduces the genetic affinity of the samples towards human reference genome. Through solving one of the most challenging biases in data analysis, so-called reference bias, genotype imputation using Glimpse v2 is promising for low coverage ancient human genomic data analysis and for rare-variant-based and haplotype-based analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mammalian Genome
Mammalian Genome 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mammalian Genome focuses on the experimental, theoretical and technical aspects of genetics, genomics, epigenetics and systems biology in mouse, human and other mammalian species, with an emphasis on the relationship between genotype and phenotype, elucidation of biological and disease pathways as well as experimental aspects of interventions, therapeutics, and precision medicine. The journal aims to publish high quality original papers that present novel findings in all areas of mammalian genetic research as well as review articles on areas of topical interest. The journal will also feature commentaries and editorials to inform readers of breakthrough discoveries as well as issues of research standards, policies and ethics.
期刊最新文献
EEF1A2 identified as a hub gene associated with the severity of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A fascination with tailless mice: a scientific historical review of studies of the T/t complex. Identification of novel biomarkers for atherosclerosis using single-cell RNA sequencing and machine learning. A comprehensive review of livestock development: insights into domestication, phylogenetics, diversity, and genomic advances. Genes related to microglia polarization and immune infiltration in Alzheimer's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1