家长版进食障碍检查:寻求治疗样本的可靠性和有效性。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4
Lisa Hail, Catherine R Drury, Robert E McGrath, Stuart B Murray, Elizabeth K Hughes, Susan M Sawyer, Daniel Le Grange, Katharine L Loeb
{"title":"家长版进食障碍检查:寻求治疗样本的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Lisa Hail, Catherine R Drury, Robert E McGrath, Stuart B Murray, Elizabeth K Hughes, Susan M Sawyer, Daniel Le Grange, Katharine L Loeb","doi":"10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of eating disorders (ED) in youth relies heavily on self-report, yet persistent lack of recognition of the presence and/or seriousness of symptoms can be intrinsic to ED. This study examines the psychometric properties of a semi-structured interview, the parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination (PEDE), developed to systematically assess caregiver report of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-site, clinical sample of youth (N = 522; age range: 12 to 18 years) seeking treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) and subsyndromal AN were assessed using the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) for youth and the PEDE for collateral caregiver report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistencies of the four PEDE subscales were on par with established ranges for the EDE. Significant medium-sized correlations and poor to moderate levels of agreement were found between the corresponding subscales on each measure. For the PEDE, confirmatory factor analysis of the EDE four-factor model provided a poor fit; an exploratory factor analysis indicated that a 3-factor model better fits the PEDE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that the PEDE has psychometric properties on par with the original EDE. The addition of the caregiver perspective may provide incremental information that can aid in the assessment of AN in youth. Future research is warranted to establish psychometric properties of the PEDE in broader transdiagnostic ED samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":48605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"12 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination: Reliability and validity in a treatment-seeking sample.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Hail, Catherine R Drury, Robert E McGrath, Stuart B Murray, Elizabeth K Hughes, Susan M Sawyer, Daniel Le Grange, Katharine L Loeb\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessment of eating disorders (ED) in youth relies heavily on self-report, yet persistent lack of recognition of the presence and/or seriousness of symptoms can be intrinsic to ED. This study examines the psychometric properties of a semi-structured interview, the parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination (PEDE), developed to systematically assess caregiver report of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-site, clinical sample of youth (N = 522; age range: 12 to 18 years) seeking treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) and subsyndromal AN were assessed using the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) for youth and the PEDE for collateral caregiver report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistencies of the four PEDE subscales were on par with established ranges for the EDE. Significant medium-sized correlations and poor to moderate levels of agreement were found between the corresponding subscales on each measure. For the PEDE, confirmatory factor analysis of the EDE four-factor model provided a poor fit; an exploratory factor analysis indicated that a 3-factor model better fits the PEDE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that the PEDE has psychometric properties on par with the original EDE. The addition of the caregiver perspective may provide incremental information that can aid in the assessment of AN in youth. Future research is warranted to establish psychometric properties of the PEDE in broader transdiagnostic ED samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01062-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对青少年进食障碍(ED)的评估在很大程度上依赖于自我报告,然而,对症状的存在和/或严重程度缺乏认识可能是进食障碍的内在原因。本研究探讨了半结构式访谈的心理计量特性,即家长版饮食失调检查(PEDE),该访谈是为系统评估护理人员对症状的报告而开发的:方法:对因神经性厌食症(AN)和亚临床AN寻求治疗的青少年(N = 522;年龄范围:12至18岁)进行了多地点临床抽样调查,使用饮食失调检查(EDE)对青少年进行评估,并使用饮食失调检查(PEDE)对附带的照顾者报告进行评估:结果:PEDE 四个分量表的内部一致性与 EDE 的既定范围相当。每项测量的相应分量表之间均存在显著的中等相关性和较差至中等程度的一致性。就 PEDE 而言,EDE 四因子模型的确认性因子分析提供了较差的拟合度;探索性因子分析表明,三因子模型更适合 PEDE:研究结果表明,PEDE 的心理测量特性与原始 EDE 相当。增加照顾者视角可提供更多信息,有助于评估青少年自闭症。未来的研究需要在更广泛的跨诊断ED样本中确定PEDE的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination: Reliability and validity in a treatment-seeking sample.

Background: Assessment of eating disorders (ED) in youth relies heavily on self-report, yet persistent lack of recognition of the presence and/or seriousness of symptoms can be intrinsic to ED. This study examines the psychometric properties of a semi-structured interview, the parent version of the Eating Disorder Examination (PEDE), developed to systematically assess caregiver report of symptoms.

Methods: A multi-site, clinical sample of youth (N = 522; age range: 12 to 18 years) seeking treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN) and subsyndromal AN were assessed using the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) for youth and the PEDE for collateral caregiver report.

Results: Internal consistencies of the four PEDE subscales were on par with established ranges for the EDE. Significant medium-sized correlations and poor to moderate levels of agreement were found between the corresponding subscales on each measure. For the PEDE, confirmatory factor analysis of the EDE four-factor model provided a poor fit; an exploratory factor analysis indicated that a 3-factor model better fits the PEDE.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that the PEDE has psychometric properties on par with the original EDE. The addition of the caregiver perspective may provide incremental information that can aid in the assessment of AN in youth. Future research is warranted to establish psychometric properties of the PEDE in broader transdiagnostic ED samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Eating Disorders
Journal of Eating Disorders Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Eating Disorders is the first open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing leading research in the science and clinical practice of eating disorders. It disseminates research that provides answers to the important issues and key challenges in the field of eating disorders and to facilitate translation of evidence into practice. The journal publishes research on all aspects of eating disorders namely their epidemiology, nature, determinants, neurobiology, prevention, treatment and outcomes. The scope includes, but is not limited to anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other eating disorders. Related areas such as important co-morbidities, obesity, body image, appetite, food and eating are also included. Articles about research methodology and assessment are welcomed where they advance the field of eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
From fixing to connecting: parents' experiences supporting adult children with eating disorders. Growing up in a larger body: youth- and parent-reported triggers for illness and barriers to recovery from anorexia nervosa. Correction: The role of impulsivity and binge eating in outpatients with overweight or obesity: an EEG temporal discounting study. Muscularity-oriented disordered eating: investigating body image concerns and the moderating role of emotion dysregulation in cyclists. Neurodivergence, intersectionality, and eating disorders: a lived experience-led narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1