安大略省 MedsCheck 计划的实际经验分析。

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2019-07-01 Epub Date: 2018-08-31
Ashley Graham, William Bartle, Patti Madorin, Vincent Teo, Artemis Diamantouros
{"title":"安大略省 MedsCheck 计划的实际经验分析。","authors":"Ashley Graham, William Bartle, Patti Madorin, Vincent Teo, Artemis Diamantouros","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ontario MedsCheck program was introduced in April 2007, with enhancements to strengthen the program made in October 2016. Previous literature has characterized patients who received the service before the enhancements and described the experiences of community pharmacists and physicians, but the experiences of participants in the enhanced MedsCheck program and those of hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians have not been explored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to describe and compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) who had received a MedsCheck before and after the program enhancements of 2016. The study also aimed to describe the experiences of patients, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians with the MedsCheck program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chart reviews were completed to identify and characterize patients who had received a MedsCheck and were admitted to SHSC between March and May 2016 (retrospective cohort) and between March and May 2017 (prospective cohort). Patients were interviewed and focus groups were conducted with pharmacy staff to explore their experiences with the MedsCheck program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MedsChecks had been performed for 321 (14.5%) of 2216 patients in the retrospective cohort and 172 (6.8%) of 2547 patients in the prospective cohort, an absolute decline of 7.7% after the 2016 enhancements. Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. Patients' experiences were varied, but because of low enrolment in the interview process (<i>n</i> = 3), it was difficult to identify and summarize common themes. The analysis of focus groups involving pharmacy staff (<i>n</i> = 27 participants) revealed that the benefits of MedsChecks depended on quality and access, and also identified common barriers and opportunities for future enhancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient interviews revealed the features of the program that patients valued. Pharmacy staff identified several benefits and barriers encountered when using MedsChecks. These findings can guide clinicians in optimal application of the current MedsCheck program and can inform subsequent program revisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Real-World Experiences with the Ontario MedsCheck Program.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Graham, William Bartle, Patti Madorin, Vincent Teo, Artemis Diamantouros\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Ontario MedsCheck program was introduced in April 2007, with enhancements to strengthen the program made in October 2016. Previous literature has characterized patients who received the service before the enhancements and described the experiences of community pharmacists and physicians, but the experiences of participants in the enhanced MedsCheck program and those of hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians have not been explored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was designed to describe and compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) who had received a MedsCheck before and after the program enhancements of 2016. The study also aimed to describe the experiences of patients, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians with the MedsCheck program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chart reviews were completed to identify and characterize patients who had received a MedsCheck and were admitted to SHSC between March and May 2016 (retrospective cohort) and between March and May 2017 (prospective cohort). Patients were interviewed and focus groups were conducted with pharmacy staff to explore their experiences with the MedsCheck program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MedsChecks had been performed for 321 (14.5%) of 2216 patients in the retrospective cohort and 172 (6.8%) of 2547 patients in the prospective cohort, an absolute decline of 7.7% after the 2016 enhancements. Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. Patients' experiences were varied, but because of low enrolment in the interview process (<i>n</i> = 3), it was difficult to identify and summarize common themes. The analysis of focus groups involving pharmacy staff (<i>n</i> = 27 participants) revealed that the benefits of MedsChecks depended on quality and access, and also identified common barriers and opportunities for future enhancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient interviews revealed the features of the program that patients valued. Pharmacy staff identified several benefits and barriers encountered when using MedsChecks. These findings can guide clinicians in optimal application of the current MedsCheck program and can inform subsequent program revisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699860/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:安大略省 MedsCheck 计划于 2007 年 4 月推出,并于 2016 年 10 月对该计划进行了强化。以前的文献描述了强化前接受该服务的患者的特征,并介绍了社区药剂师和医生的经验,但尚未探讨强化后 MedsCheck 计划参与者的经验以及医院药剂师和药房技术人员的经验:本研究旨在描述和比较 Sunnybrook 健康科学中心(Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre,SHSC)收治的、在 2016 年项目改进前后接受过 MedsCheck 检查的患者的人口统计学和临床特征。研究还旨在描述患者、医院药剂师和药房技术人员对 MedsCheck 项目的体验:研究人员完成了病历审查,以确定在 2016 年 3 月至 5 月期间(回顾性队列)和 2017 年 3 月至 5 月期间(前瞻性队列)接受过 MedsCheck 并入住 SHSC 的患者的身份和特征。对患者进行了访谈,并与药房工作人员进行了焦点小组讨论,以探讨他们对 MedsCheck 项目的体验:在回顾性队列中,2216 名患者中有 321 人(14.5%)接受了 MedsChecks 检查,在前瞻性队列中,2547 名患者中有 172 人(6.8%)接受了 MedsChecks 检查,2016 年改进后绝对值下降了 7.7%。两个队列的患者特征相似。患者的经历各不相同,但由于参与访谈的人数较少(n = 3),因此难以确定和总结共同的主题。对有药房工作人员参加的焦点小组(n = 27 名参与者)的分析表明,"药物检查 "的益处取决于质量和获取途径,同时也发现了共同的障碍和未来改进的机会:结论:与患者的访谈显示了患者重视该计划的特点。药房工作人员指出了使用 MedsChecks 时遇到的一些益处和障碍。这些发现可以指导临床医生以最佳方式应用当前的 MedsChecks 计划,并为后续的计划修订提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Real-World Experiences with the Ontario MedsCheck Program.

Background: The Ontario MedsCheck program was introduced in April 2007, with enhancements to strengthen the program made in October 2016. Previous literature has characterized patients who received the service before the enhancements and described the experiences of community pharmacists and physicians, but the experiences of participants in the enhanced MedsCheck program and those of hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians have not been explored.

Objectives: This study was designed to describe and compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients admitted to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) who had received a MedsCheck before and after the program enhancements of 2016. The study also aimed to describe the experiences of patients, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians with the MedsCheck program.

Methods: Chart reviews were completed to identify and characterize patients who had received a MedsCheck and were admitted to SHSC between March and May 2016 (retrospective cohort) and between March and May 2017 (prospective cohort). Patients were interviewed and focus groups were conducted with pharmacy staff to explore their experiences with the MedsCheck program.

Results: MedsChecks had been performed for 321 (14.5%) of 2216 patients in the retrospective cohort and 172 (6.8%) of 2547 patients in the prospective cohort, an absolute decline of 7.7% after the 2016 enhancements. Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 cohorts. Patients' experiences were varied, but because of low enrolment in the interview process (n = 3), it was difficult to identify and summarize common themes. The analysis of focus groups involving pharmacy staff (n = 27 participants) revealed that the benefits of MedsChecks depended on quality and access, and also identified common barriers and opportunities for future enhancements.

Conclusions: Patient interviews revealed the features of the program that patients valued. Pharmacy staff identified several benefits and barriers encountered when using MedsChecks. These findings can guide clinicians in optimal application of the current MedsCheck program and can inform subsequent program revisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Baby Step Toward Planetary Health: A Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Single-Use Plastics in a Pharmacy and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Discharge Opioid Prescription and Consumption Following Surgery: The POPCORN Observational Study. Embracing Our Future: A Revised Name for CSHP. Embrasser notre avenir: un nouveau nom pour la SCPH. Inspirer la relève à devenir des pharmaciennes et pharmaciens des réseaux de la santé.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1