种植体-基台连接和基台角度对种植体周围应力水平的影响:有限元分析研究

Ishtiyak Khatib, Nilesh V Joshi, Prajakta Rao, Mridula Joshi, Anupa Shetty, Vinayak Thorat, Prakash Talreja
{"title":"种植体-基台连接和基台角度对种植体周围应力水平的影响:有限元分析研究","authors":"Ishtiyak Khatib, Nilesh V Joshi, Prajakta Rao, Mridula Joshi, Anupa Shetty, Vinayak Thorat, Prakash Talreja","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Placement of an implant in the maxillary anterior region is challenging due to the angulation of bone in this area. Angled abutments may be used to achieve proper restorative contours. The present study was undertaken to examine and compare the stress levels of implants in the maxillary anterior region having different types of internal connections and different abutment angulations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Implants with three types of abutment connections, internal conical, Morse taper, and internal hex, were modeled using SolidWorks software. Three abutment angulations of 0, 15, and 30 degrees were used for each type of implant. A 100 N axial load was applied to the implants, and the stresses on the implant, abutment, and bone were analyzed by finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the straight abutments, the most stress was in model 3A (62.60 MPa). The stress value among angled abutments was highest with 30-degree angled abutments. The value was highest in model 3C (94.83 MPa). Internal hex connection showed the highest stress levels in all degrees of angulation of the abutment, and Morse taper connection showed the least amount of stress in all three abutment angles. The most stress concentration was seen in the cortical bone on the buccal surface in the implant-abutment junction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Morse taper design of implant exhibited the least-highest stress levels on the alveolar bone. The stress levels increased with the increasing angulation of the implant or implant-abutment connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":72651,"journal":{"name":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","volume":"45 7","pages":"e5-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection and Abutment Angulations on Peri-implant Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ishtiyak Khatib, Nilesh V Joshi, Prajakta Rao, Mridula Joshi, Anupa Shetty, Vinayak Thorat, Prakash Talreja\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Placement of an implant in the maxillary anterior region is challenging due to the angulation of bone in this area. Angled abutments may be used to achieve proper restorative contours. The present study was undertaken to examine and compare the stress levels of implants in the maxillary anterior region having different types of internal connections and different abutment angulations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Implants with three types of abutment connections, internal conical, Morse taper, and internal hex, were modeled using SolidWorks software. Three abutment angulations of 0, 15, and 30 degrees were used for each type of implant. A 100 N axial load was applied to the implants, and the stresses on the implant, abutment, and bone were analyzed by finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the straight abutments, the most stress was in model 3A (62.60 MPa). The stress value among angled abutments was highest with 30-degree angled abutments. The value was highest in model 3C (94.83 MPa). Internal hex connection showed the highest stress levels in all degrees of angulation of the abutment, and Morse taper connection showed the least amount of stress in all three abutment angles. The most stress concentration was seen in the cortical bone on the buccal surface in the implant-abutment junction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Morse taper design of implant exhibited the least-highest stress levels on the alveolar bone. The stress levels increased with the increasing angulation of the implant or implant-abutment connection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)\",\"volume\":\"45 7\",\"pages\":\"e5-e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在上颌前牙区域植入种植体具有挑战性,因为该区域的骨有一定的角度。为了获得合适的修复轮廓,可以使用成角基台。本研究旨在研究和比较上颌前牙区种植体的应力水平,这些种植体具有不同类型的内部连接和不同的基台角度:使用 SolidWorks 软件对具有内锥形、莫尔斯锥形和内六角三种基台连接方式的种植体进行建模。每种种植体的基台角度分别为 0 度、15 度和 30 度。对种植体施加 100 N 的轴向载荷,并通过有限元分析对种植体、基台和骨的应力进行分析:结果:在直基台中,3A 型号的应力最大(62.60 兆帕)。在成角基台中,30 度角基台的应力值最大。模型 3C 的应力值最高(94.83 兆帕)。内六角连接在所有角度的基台中都显示出最高的应力水平,而莫氏锥形连接在所有三个角度的基台中显示出最小的应力。最大的应力集中在种植体与基台交界处颊面的皮质骨中:结论:莫氏锥度设计的种植体对牙槽骨的应力最小,也最高。结论:莫氏锥度设计的种植体对牙槽骨的应力水平最低,但随着种植体或种植体与基台连接角度的增加,应力水平也随之增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Implant-Abutment Connection and Abutment Angulations on Peri-implant Stress Levels: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Introduction: Placement of an implant in the maxillary anterior region is challenging due to the angulation of bone in this area. Angled abutments may be used to achieve proper restorative contours. The present study was undertaken to examine and compare the stress levels of implants in the maxillary anterior region having different types of internal connections and different abutment angulations.

Material and methods: Implants with three types of abutment connections, internal conical, Morse taper, and internal hex, were modeled using SolidWorks software. Three abutment angulations of 0, 15, and 30 degrees were used for each type of implant. A 100 N axial load was applied to the implants, and the stresses on the implant, abutment, and bone were analyzed by finite element analysis.

Results: Among the straight abutments, the most stress was in model 3A (62.60 MPa). The stress value among angled abutments was highest with 30-degree angled abutments. The value was highest in model 3C (94.83 MPa). Internal hex connection showed the highest stress levels in all degrees of angulation of the abutment, and Morse taper connection showed the least amount of stress in all three abutment angles. The most stress concentration was seen in the cortical bone on the buccal surface in the implant-abutment junction.

Conclusion: The Morse taper design of implant exhibited the least-highest stress levels on the alveolar bone. The stress levels increased with the increasing angulation of the implant or implant-abutment connection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Conservative Restorative Approach for a Patient With Cleft Palate: Replacing a Lateral Incisor and Enhancing Esthetics. A New Era for Indirect Restorations With CAD/CAM and 3D Printing Technologies. Alpha Omega: Envisioning the Next Generation of Leaders. Digital Workflow for a Definitive Implant-Supported Hybrid Prosthesis. Leveraging Digital Smile Design Technology in Esthetic Restorative Dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1