环保主义公共政策企业家的战略:结合金登和罗斯

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103841
{"title":"环保主义公共政策企业家的战略:结合金登和罗斯","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Combining the Multiple Streams Framework and Rose et al.’s (2020) tips for environmentalists to approach policy windows, we examined which strategies policy entrepreneurs from Brazil’s National Cabotage Program and National Biofuels Policy adopted to ensure their approval. In the National Cabotage Program, the employment by the Ministry of Infrastructure of the capacities to foresee and create a policy window, reflected in the decision to create a Navigation and Waterways Department, and to persevere, continuously negotiating the draft bill of the Program with the executive and the legislative branches, contributed to policy approval. In the National Biofuels Policy, the employment of the capacities to respond by the association of sugarcane producers, through sending a market-based proposal to a call for policy proposals opened by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, and to frame, by emphasizing the biofuel policy as a solution for Brazil to attain its climate commitments, was key, sparing the use of other strategies. The findings suggest that more than one combination of strategies can lead to policy approval, whereas it is not necessary to adopt all of them in a single process, with seeming compensation between them. Future studies could investigate the outcomes of different combinations of capabilities and qualities of public policy entrepreneurs in other public policy processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for environmentalist public policy entrepreneurs: Combining Kingdon and Rose\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Combining the Multiple Streams Framework and Rose et al.’s (2020) tips for environmentalists to approach policy windows, we examined which strategies policy entrepreneurs from Brazil’s National Cabotage Program and National Biofuels Policy adopted to ensure their approval. In the National Cabotage Program, the employment by the Ministry of Infrastructure of the capacities to foresee and create a policy window, reflected in the decision to create a Navigation and Waterways Department, and to persevere, continuously negotiating the draft bill of the Program with the executive and the legislative branches, contributed to policy approval. In the National Biofuels Policy, the employment of the capacities to respond by the association of sugarcane producers, through sending a market-based proposal to a call for policy proposals opened by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, and to frame, by emphasizing the biofuel policy as a solution for Brazil to attain its climate commitments, was key, sparing the use of other strategies. The findings suggest that more than one combination of strategies can lead to policy approval, whereas it is not necessary to adopt all of them in a single process, with seeming compensation between them. Future studies could investigate the outcomes of different combinations of capabilities and qualities of public policy entrepreneurs in other public policy processes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结合 "多重流框架 "和罗斯等人(2020 年)为环保人士提供的接近政策窗口的建议,我们研究了巴西国家沿海航行计划和国家生物燃料政策的政策制定者采取了哪些策略来确保政策获得批准。在 "国家沿海航行计划 "中,基础设施部利用预测和创建政策窗口的能力(体现在决定创建航行和水道部),并坚持不懈地与行政和立法部门就该计划的法案草案不断进行谈判,从而促进了政策的批准。在国家生物燃料政策方面,甘蔗生产者协会通过向矿产和能源部发出政策建议征集函,提出了以市场为基础的建议,并通过强调生物燃料政策是巴西实现其气候承诺的一个解决方案,利用了响应能力,这是避免使用其他战略的关键所在。研究结果表明,不止一种策略组合可以使政策获得批准,但没有必要在一个过程中采用所有策略,而在这些策略之间进行补偿。未来的研究可以调查公共政策企业家在其他公共政策过程中不同能力和素质组合的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for environmentalist public policy entrepreneurs: Combining Kingdon and Rose

Combining the Multiple Streams Framework and Rose et al.’s (2020) tips for environmentalists to approach policy windows, we examined which strategies policy entrepreneurs from Brazil’s National Cabotage Program and National Biofuels Policy adopted to ensure their approval. In the National Cabotage Program, the employment by the Ministry of Infrastructure of the capacities to foresee and create a policy window, reflected in the decision to create a Navigation and Waterways Department, and to persevere, continuously negotiating the draft bill of the Program with the executive and the legislative branches, contributed to policy approval. In the National Biofuels Policy, the employment of the capacities to respond by the association of sugarcane producers, through sending a market-based proposal to a call for policy proposals opened by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, and to frame, by emphasizing the biofuel policy as a solution for Brazil to attain its climate commitments, was key, sparing the use of other strategies. The findings suggest that more than one combination of strategies can lead to policy approval, whereas it is not necessary to adopt all of them in a single process, with seeming compensation between them. Future studies could investigate the outcomes of different combinations of capabilities and qualities of public policy entrepreneurs in other public policy processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1