土壤监管政策是否减少了矿业公司的环境违法行为?

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 N/A ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105223
{"title":"土壤监管政策是否减少了矿业公司的环境违法行为?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compared to research on air and water pollution, scholarly attention to soil pollution remains somewhat marginalized. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) analytical framework, this research examines the impact of China's “Action Plan on Soil Pollution Prevention and Control” (APSPPC) policy on mining firms. Our result shows that the APSPPC policy can significantly reduce pollution violations by mining firms. And this finding retains its significance after an extensive series of robustness validations. In addition, APSPPC mainly affects mining firms' pollution compliance by promoting environmental protection investment and improving resource allocation efficiency. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy compliance of mineral-extracting firms is achieved by increasing end-treatment and equipment purchases, while the compliance of mineral-processing firms with the APSPPC is achieved through technological progress and source control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has soil regulation policy reduced environmental violations by mining firms?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Compared to research on air and water pollution, scholarly attention to soil pollution remains somewhat marginalized. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) analytical framework, this research examines the impact of China's “Action Plan on Soil Pollution Prevention and Control” (APSPPC) policy on mining firms. Our result shows that the APSPPC policy can significantly reduce pollution violations by mining firms. And this finding retains its significance after an extensive series of robustness validations. In addition, APSPPC mainly affects mining firms' pollution compliance by promoting environmental protection investment and improving resource allocation efficiency. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy compliance of mineral-extracting firms is achieved by increasing end-treatment and equipment purchases, while the compliance of mineral-processing firms with the APSPPC is achieved through technological progress and source control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724005907\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724005907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与对空气和水污染的研究相比,学者们对土壤污染的关注仍然有些边缘化。本研究采用差分法(DID)分析框架,考察了中国《土壤污染防治行动计划》(APSPPC)政策对矿业企业的影响。研究结果表明,《土壤污染防治行动计划》政策能够显著减少矿业企业的污染违规行为。在经过一系列广泛的稳健性验证后,这一结论仍然具有重要意义。此外,APSPPC 主要通过促进环保投资和提高资源配置效率来影响矿业企业的污染守法行为。此外,异质性分析表明,矿产开采企业是通过增加终端处理和设备采购来实现政策合规的,而矿产加工企业则是通过技术进步和源头控制来实现 APSPPC 的合规性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Has soil regulation policy reduced environmental violations by mining firms?

Compared to research on air and water pollution, scholarly attention to soil pollution remains somewhat marginalized. Using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) analytical framework, this research examines the impact of China's “Action Plan on Soil Pollution Prevention and Control” (APSPPC) policy on mining firms. Our result shows that the APSPPC policy can significantly reduce pollution violations by mining firms. And this finding retains its significance after an extensive series of robustness validations. In addition, APSPPC mainly affects mining firms' pollution compliance by promoting environmental protection investment and improving resource allocation efficiency. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy compliance of mineral-extracting firms is achieved by increasing end-treatment and equipment purchases, while the compliance of mineral-processing firms with the APSPPC is achieved through technological progress and source control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of factors affecting copper consumption in major countries in light of green economy and its trend characteristics Prediction of coal mine risk based on BN-ELM: Gas risk early warning including human factors Blessings or curses? Exploring the impact of digital technology innovation on natural resource utilization efficiency in China Energy structure and green productivity dynamics: Investigation from OECD Countries A sustainable integration of mining activity in a tourist mountain territory: The case of Germanasca Valley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1