Non-vascularised fibula as an adjuvant in the management of diaphyseal humerus non-union- A meta-analysis and systematic review

Introduction

There is no standard protocol for managing non-union of diaphyseal humerus bone, with several authors reporting their results using various techniques and methods for its management. No meta-analysis has reported the results of managing these cases with non-vascularized fibula grafting as an adjuvant for osteosynthesis.

Materials and methods

This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled data for calculating the union rates in diaphyseal humerus fractures managed with non-vascularized fibula grafting. Risk of Bias was computed using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool.

Results

A total of 5 studies, comprising 102 patients, were included. The pooled estimate demonstrated that 94 patients achieved bone union with intramedullary fibular strut grafting. The pooled union rate (per 100 events) was 90.59 (95 % CI, 82.86–95.04, I² = 0). The present meta-analysis also showed a significant improvement in DASH scores following the use of a non-vascularized fibula graft with a common effects model (SMD = 4.08; 95%CI: 3.44; 4.72; p < 0.01 I² = 19 %, p-value for Q test = 0.29).

Conclusion

Non-vascularized fibula grafting is an excellent adjuvant for the internal fixation of non-union diaphyseal humerus fractures. Although there is limited literature, further studies should highlight and assess the treatment of these uncommon but disabling conditions.