吃草的螃蟹推动盐沼碳储存和恢复

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4385
Serina S. Wittyngham, David Samuel Johnson, Yaping Chen, Matthew L. Kirwan
{"title":"吃草的螃蟹推动盐沼碳储存和恢复","authors":"Serina S. Wittyngham,&nbsp;David Samuel Johnson,&nbsp;Yaping Chen,&nbsp;Matthew L. Kirwan","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumers can directly (e.g., consumption) and indirectly (e.g., trophic cascades) influence carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems. Previous work found that large grazers have nuanced effects on carbon stocks, yet, small, bioturbating-grazers, which remove plant biomass and alter sediment properties, remain an understudied driver of carbon cycling. We used field-derived and remote sensing data to quantify how the purple marsh crab, <i>Sesarma reticulatum</i>, influenced carbon stocks, flux, and recovery in salt marshes. <i>Sesarma</i> caused a 40%–70% loss in carbon stocks as fronts propagated inland (i.e., ungrazed to recovered transition), with front migration rates accelerating over time. Despite latitudinal differences, front migration rate had no effect on carbon stocks, flux, or time to replacement. When we included <i>Sesarma</i> disturbance in carbon flux calculations, we found it may take 5–100 years for marshes to replace lost carbon, if at all. Combined, we show that small grazers cause a net loss in carbon stocks as they move through the landscape, and irrespective of migration rate, these grazer-driven impacts persist for decades. This work showcases the significant role of consumers in carbon storage and flux, challenging the classic paradigm of plant–sediment feedbacks as the primary ecogeomorphic driver of carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"105 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4385","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A grazing crab drives saltmarsh carbon storage and recovery\",\"authors\":\"Serina S. Wittyngham,&nbsp;David Samuel Johnson,&nbsp;Yaping Chen,&nbsp;Matthew L. Kirwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecy.4385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Consumers can directly (e.g., consumption) and indirectly (e.g., trophic cascades) influence carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems. Previous work found that large grazers have nuanced effects on carbon stocks, yet, small, bioturbating-grazers, which remove plant biomass and alter sediment properties, remain an understudied driver of carbon cycling. We used field-derived and remote sensing data to quantify how the purple marsh crab, <i>Sesarma reticulatum</i>, influenced carbon stocks, flux, and recovery in salt marshes. <i>Sesarma</i> caused a 40%–70% loss in carbon stocks as fronts propagated inland (i.e., ungrazed to recovered transition), with front migration rates accelerating over time. Despite latitudinal differences, front migration rate had no effect on carbon stocks, flux, or time to replacement. When we included <i>Sesarma</i> disturbance in carbon flux calculations, we found it may take 5–100 years for marshes to replace lost carbon, if at all. Combined, we show that small grazers cause a net loss in carbon stocks as they move through the landscape, and irrespective of migration rate, these grazer-driven impacts persist for decades. This work showcases the significant role of consumers in carbon storage and flux, challenging the classic paradigm of plant–sediment feedbacks as the primary ecogeomorphic driver of carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology\",\"volume\":\"105 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4385\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4385\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消费者可以直接(如消耗)或间接(如营养级联)影响蓝碳生态系统中的碳循环。以前的研究发现,大型食草动物对碳储量有细微的影响,然而,小型生物扰动食草动物会清除植物生物量并改变沉积物的性质,它们仍然是碳循环的一个未被充分研究的驱动因素。我们利用实地数据和遥感数据来量化紫色沼泽蟹(Sesarma reticulatum)对盐沼中碳储量、碳通量和碳恢复的影响。随着锋面向内陆传播(即从未开垦到恢复的过渡),Sesarma导致碳储量损失40%-70%,锋面迁移速度随时间加快。尽管存在纬度差异,但锋面迁移率对碳储量、通量或替代时间没有影响。当我们在计算碳通量时考虑到塞萨尔玛干扰时,我们发现沼泽可能需要5-100年的时间来替代失去的碳,如果有的话。综上所述,我们发现小型食草动物在地形中移动时会造成碳储量的净损失,而且无论迁移速度如何,这些食草动物驱动的影响都会持续数十年。这项工作展示了消费者在碳储存和碳通量中的重要作用,挑战了植物-沉积物反馈是蓝碳生态系统碳循环主要生态地貌驱动力的经典模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A grazing crab drives saltmarsh carbon storage and recovery

Consumers can directly (e.g., consumption) and indirectly (e.g., trophic cascades) influence carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems. Previous work found that large grazers have nuanced effects on carbon stocks, yet, small, bioturbating-grazers, which remove plant biomass and alter sediment properties, remain an understudied driver of carbon cycling. We used field-derived and remote sensing data to quantify how the purple marsh crab, Sesarma reticulatum, influenced carbon stocks, flux, and recovery in salt marshes. Sesarma caused a 40%–70% loss in carbon stocks as fronts propagated inland (i.e., ungrazed to recovered transition), with front migration rates accelerating over time. Despite latitudinal differences, front migration rate had no effect on carbon stocks, flux, or time to replacement. When we included Sesarma disturbance in carbon flux calculations, we found it may take 5–100 years for marshes to replace lost carbon, if at all. Combined, we show that small grazers cause a net loss in carbon stocks as they move through the landscape, and irrespective of migration rate, these grazer-driven impacts persist for decades. This work showcases the significant role of consumers in carbon storage and flux, challenging the classic paradigm of plant–sediment feedbacks as the primary ecogeomorphic driver of carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Eco‐phenotypic feedback loops differ in multistressor environments Mistletoes on lianas: Seed dispersal highways or drought safe havens? Evidence from South American temperate rainforests Publication‐driven consistency in food web structures: Implications for comparative ecology Condo or cuisine? The function of fine woody debris in driving decomposition, detritivores, and their predators Functional R code is rare in species distribution and abundance papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1