转移性骨痛的尿液生物标志物:伊班膦酸钠与单剂量放疗治疗前列腺癌局部转移性骨痛的多中心随机试验结果(RIB)

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Bone Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100624
{"title":"转移性骨痛的尿液生物标志物:伊班膦酸钠与单剂量放疗治疗前列腺癌局部转移性骨痛的多中心随机试验结果(RIB)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Radiotherapy IBandronate (RIB) trial compared single dose radiotherapy and a single infusion of ibandronate in 470 bisphosphonate naïve patients with metastatic bone pain from prostate cancer randomised into a non-inferiority two arm study. Results for the primary endpoint of pain score response at 4 weeks showed that the ibandronate arm was non-inferior to single dose radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>In addition to pain assessments including analgesic use made at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, urine was collected at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. It was subsequently analysed for urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) and cystatin C. Linear regression models were used to compare the continuous outcome measures for urinary markers within treatment arms and baseline measurements were included as covariates. Interaction terms were fitted to allow for cross-treatment group comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The primary endpoint of the RIB trial was worst pain response at 4 weeks and there was no treatment difference seen. Urine samples and paired pain scores at 4 weeks were available for 273 patients (radiotherapy 168; ibandronate 159)</p><p>The baseline samples measured for the RIB trial had an average concentration of 193 nM BCE/mM creatinine (range of 7.3–1871) compared to the quoted normal range of 33 nM BCE/mM creatinine (3 to 63). In contrast the average value of Cystatin C was 66 ng/ml (ranges ND – 1120 ng/ml) compared to the quoted normal range of 62.9 ng/ml (ranges 12.6–188 ng/ml). A statistically significant reduction in NTx concentrations between baseline and 4 weeks was seen in the ibandronate arm but not in the radiotherapy arm. No correlation between pain response and urinary marker concentration was seen in either the ibandronate or radiotherapy cohort at any time point.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NTx was significantly raised compared to the normal range consistent with a role as a biomarker for bone metastases from prostate cancer. A significant reduction in NTx 4 weeks after ibandronate is consistent with its action in osteoclast inhibition which was not seen after radiotherapy implying a different mode of action for radiation. There was no correlation between bone biomarker levels and pain response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001040/pdfft?md5=674fc5276d011467eed3b2f1a24c1371&pid=1-s2.0-S2212137424001040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary biomarkers in metastatic bone pain: Results from a multicentre randomized trial of ibandronate compared to single dose radiotherapy for localized metastatic bone pain in prostate cancer (RIB)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Radiotherapy IBandronate (RIB) trial compared single dose radiotherapy and a single infusion of ibandronate in 470 bisphosphonate naïve patients with metastatic bone pain from prostate cancer randomised into a non-inferiority two arm study. Results for the primary endpoint of pain score response at 4 weeks showed that the ibandronate arm was non-inferior to single dose radiotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>In addition to pain assessments including analgesic use made at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, urine was collected at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. It was subsequently analysed for urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) and cystatin C. Linear regression models were used to compare the continuous outcome measures for urinary markers within treatment arms and baseline measurements were included as covariates. Interaction terms were fitted to allow for cross-treatment group comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The primary endpoint of the RIB trial was worst pain response at 4 weeks and there was no treatment difference seen. Urine samples and paired pain scores at 4 weeks were available for 273 patients (radiotherapy 168; ibandronate 159)</p><p>The baseline samples measured for the RIB trial had an average concentration of 193 nM BCE/mM creatinine (range of 7.3–1871) compared to the quoted normal range of 33 nM BCE/mM creatinine (3 to 63). In contrast the average value of Cystatin C was 66 ng/ml (ranges ND – 1120 ng/ml) compared to the quoted normal range of 62.9 ng/ml (ranges 12.6–188 ng/ml). A statistically significant reduction in NTx concentrations between baseline and 4 weeks was seen in the ibandronate arm but not in the radiotherapy arm. No correlation between pain response and urinary marker concentration was seen in either the ibandronate or radiotherapy cohort at any time point.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NTx was significantly raised compared to the normal range consistent with a role as a biomarker for bone metastases from prostate cancer. A significant reduction in NTx 4 weeks after ibandronate is consistent with its action in osteoclast inhibition which was not seen after radiotherapy implying a different mode of action for radiation. There was no correlation between bone biomarker levels and pain response.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001040/pdfft?md5=674fc5276d011467eed3b2f1a24c1371&pid=1-s2.0-S2212137424001040-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景IBandronate放疗(RIB)试验比较了单剂量放疗和单次输注伊班膦酸盐对470名患有前列腺癌转移性骨痛的未接受过双磷酸盐治疗的患者的治疗效果。患者和方法除了在基线、4周、8周、12周、26周和52周进行疼痛评估(包括镇痛剂使用)外,还在基线、4周和12周收集尿液。线性回归模型用于比较治疗组内尿液标记物的连续结果测量值,基线测量值被列为协变量。结果RIB试验的主要终点是4周时最严重的疼痛反应,没有发现治疗差异。273名患者(放疗168人;伊班膦酸盐159人)的尿液样本和4周时的配对疼痛评分均可获得。RIB试验测量的基线样本的平均浓度为193 nM BCE/mM肌酐(范围为7.3-1871),而引用的正常范围为33 nM BCE/mM肌酐(3-63)。相反,胱抑素 C 的平均值为 66 纳克/毫升(范围为 ND - 1120 纳克/毫升),而引用的正常值范围为 62.9 纳克/毫升(范围为 12.6-188 纳克/毫升)。伊班膦酸钠治疗组的NTx浓度在基线和4周之间出现了统计学意义上的明显降低,而放疗组则没有。在任何时间点,伊班膦酸钠组和放疗组均未发现疼痛反应与尿液标记物浓度之间存在相关性。伊班膦酸钠治疗 4 周后,NTx 明显降低,这与伊班膦酸钠抑制破骨细胞的作用一致,而放疗后却没有出现这种情况,这意味着放疗的作用模式不同。骨生物标志物水平与疼痛反应之间没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urinary biomarkers in metastatic bone pain: Results from a multicentre randomized trial of ibandronate compared to single dose radiotherapy for localized metastatic bone pain in prostate cancer (RIB)

Background

The Radiotherapy IBandronate (RIB) trial compared single dose radiotherapy and a single infusion of ibandronate in 470 bisphosphonate naïve patients with metastatic bone pain from prostate cancer randomised into a non-inferiority two arm study. Results for the primary endpoint of pain score response at 4 weeks showed that the ibandronate arm was non-inferior to single dose radiotherapy.

Patients and method

In addition to pain assessments including analgesic use made at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, urine was collected at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. It was subsequently analysed for urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) and cystatin C. Linear regression models were used to compare the continuous outcome measures for urinary markers within treatment arms and baseline measurements were included as covariates. Interaction terms were fitted to allow for cross-treatment group comparisons.

Results

The primary endpoint of the RIB trial was worst pain response at 4 weeks and there was no treatment difference seen. Urine samples and paired pain scores at 4 weeks were available for 273 patients (radiotherapy 168; ibandronate 159)

The baseline samples measured for the RIB trial had an average concentration of 193 nM BCE/mM creatinine (range of 7.3–1871) compared to the quoted normal range of 33 nM BCE/mM creatinine (3 to 63). In contrast the average value of Cystatin C was 66 ng/ml (ranges ND – 1120 ng/ml) compared to the quoted normal range of 62.9 ng/ml (ranges 12.6–188 ng/ml). A statistically significant reduction in NTx concentrations between baseline and 4 weeks was seen in the ibandronate arm but not in the radiotherapy arm. No correlation between pain response and urinary marker concentration was seen in either the ibandronate or radiotherapy cohort at any time point.

Conclusion

NTx was significantly raised compared to the normal range consistent with a role as a biomarker for bone metastases from prostate cancer. A significant reduction in NTx 4 weeks after ibandronate is consistent with its action in osteoclast inhibition which was not seen after radiotherapy implying a different mode of action for radiation. There was no correlation between bone biomarker levels and pain response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone Oncology is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting basic, translational and clinical high-quality research related to bone and cancer. As the first journal dedicated to cancer induced bone diseases, JBO welcomes original research articles, review articles, editorials and opinion pieces. Case reports will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and only when accompanied by a comprehensive review of the subject. The areas covered by the journal include: Bone metastases (pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical features, prevention, treatment) Preclinical models of metastasis Bone microenvironment in cancer (stem cell, bone cell and cancer interactions) Bone targeted therapy (pharmacology, therapeutic targets, drug development, clinical trials, side-effects, outcome research, health economics) Cancer treatment induced bone loss (epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management) Bone imaging (clinical and animal, skeletal interventional radiology) Bone biomarkers (clinical and translational applications) Radiotherapy and radio-isotopes Skeletal complications Bone pain (mechanisms and management) Orthopaedic cancer surgery Primary bone tumours Clinical guidelines Multidisciplinary care Keywords: bisphosphonate, bone, breast cancer, cancer, CTIBL, denosumab, metastasis, myeloma, osteoblast, osteoclast, osteooncology, osteo-oncology, prostate cancer, skeleton, tumour.
期刊最新文献
Clinical decision-making in bone cancer care management and forecast of ICU needs based on computed tomography Progression of vertebral fractures in metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer patients given immune checkpoint inhibitors Is surgery without curettage effective for periacetabular Metastasis? Insights from a survival study of 93 patients Bone density measurement in patients with spinal metastatic tumors using chest quantitative CT deep learning model Deep bone oncology Diagnostics: Computed tomography based Machine learning for detection of bone tumors from breast cancer metastasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1