阿达木单抗每周治疗难治性葡萄膜炎的成功预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY American Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2024.07.010
Timothy M. Janetos, Kunal Kanwar, Saffiya Bashey, Anjum Koreishi, Debra A. Goldstein
{"title":"阿达木单抗每周治疗难治性葡萄膜炎的成功预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Timothy M. Janetos,&nbsp;Kunal Kanwar,&nbsp;Saffiya Bashey,&nbsp;Anjum Koreishi,&nbsp;Debra A. Goldstein","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine predictors of treatment success after dose escalation of adalimumab, including the measurement of anti-adalimumab antibodies as a predictor of success.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective clinical cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><em>Setting</em>: Single-center academic institution. <em>Study population</em>: Patients with noninfectious uveitis who were inadequately controlled or developed recurrent disease on every other week adalimumab and required dose escalation or therapy modification. <em>Observation procedures</em>: Patients who had anti-adalimumab antibodies checked with resultant low to intermediate levels were compared with patients who had no testing performed before adalimumab dose escalation. Of note, patients with testing and resultant high levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were not escalated. Predictors of escalation success and utility of antibody testing before escalation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. <em>Main outcome measures</em>: Treatment success defined as anterior chamber grade ≤0.5+ cell, topical corticosteroids ≤1 drop/d, oral prednisone ≤5 mg/d, resolution of macular edema, and resolution of angiographic signs of inflammation without any addition or escalation of therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 patients had antibodies tested with low to intermediate levels (average: 32.3 ng/mL, range: 0-154 ng/mL), whereas 41 did not have antibody testing. A greater treatment success rate after escalation was observed among the “low antibody” group compared with the “no testing” group (hazard ratio: 2.63, standard error: 1.19, <em>P</em> = .031, 95% CI: 1.09-6.37). Among the entire cohort, patients with panuveitis (<em>n</em> = 14) had a lower treatment success rate compared with the reference of anterior uveitis (<em>n</em> = 26) (hazard ratio: 0.09, standard error: 0.11, <em>P</em> = .05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with low anti-adalimumab antibodies had a greater treatment success than patients in whom antibodies were not checked. This suggests a utility to checking antibodies before dose escalation and that low levels of antibodies may confer a success advantage. Overall, patients with panuveitis had a lower rate of success after escalation while patients with anterior uveitis patients had a very high rate of success suggesting that certain disease characteristics may guide clinicians when determining who to escalate versus changing therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Therapy Success in Weekly Adalimumab for Refractory Uveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Timothy M. Janetos,&nbsp;Kunal Kanwar,&nbsp;Saffiya Bashey,&nbsp;Anjum Koreishi,&nbsp;Debra A. Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To determine predictors of treatment success after dose escalation of adalimumab, including the measurement of anti-adalimumab antibodies as a predictor of success.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective clinical cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><em>Setting</em>: Single-center academic institution. <em>Study population</em>: Patients with noninfectious uveitis who were inadequately controlled or developed recurrent disease on every other week adalimumab and required dose escalation or therapy modification. <em>Observation procedures</em>: Patients who had anti-adalimumab antibodies checked with resultant low to intermediate levels were compared with patients who had no testing performed before adalimumab dose escalation. Of note, patients with testing and resultant high levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were not escalated. Predictors of escalation success and utility of antibody testing before escalation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. <em>Main outcome measures</em>: Treatment success defined as anterior chamber grade ≤0.5+ cell, topical corticosteroids ≤1 drop/d, oral prednisone ≤5 mg/d, resolution of macular edema, and resolution of angiographic signs of inflammation without any addition or escalation of therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 patients had antibodies tested with low to intermediate levels (average: 32.3 ng/mL, range: 0-154 ng/mL), whereas 41 did not have antibody testing. A greater treatment success rate after escalation was observed among the “low antibody” group compared with the “no testing” group (hazard ratio: 2.63, standard error: 1.19, <em>P</em> = .031, 95% CI: 1.09-6.37). Among the entire cohort, patients with panuveitis (<em>n</em> = 14) had a lower treatment success rate compared with the reference of anterior uveitis (<em>n</em> = 26) (hazard ratio: 0.09, standard error: 0.11, <em>P</em> = .05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with low anti-adalimumab antibodies had a greater treatment success than patients in whom antibodies were not checked. This suggests a utility to checking antibodies before dose escalation and that low levels of antibodies may confer a success advantage. Overall, patients with panuveitis had a lower rate of success after escalation while patients with anterior uveitis patients had a very high rate of success suggesting that certain disease characteristics may guide clinicians when determining who to escalate versus changing therapy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000293942400312X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000293942400312X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定阿达木单抗剂量升级后治疗成功的预测因素,包括作为成功预测因素的抗阿达木单抗抗体的测定:单中心学术机构 研究人群:非感染性葡萄膜炎患者,使用阿达木单抗双周治疗后病情未得到充分控制或复发,需要剂量升级或调整治疗方案 观察程序:对使用阿达木单抗双周治疗后病情未得到充分控制或复发,需要剂量升级或调整治疗方案的患者进行观察:与阿达木单抗剂量升级前未进行检测的患者相比,检查结果显示抗阿达木单抗抗体处于中低水平。值得注意的是,检测结果显示抗阿达木单抗抗体水平较高的患者未进行剂量升级。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔生存分析和考克斯比例危险模型分析了剂量升级成功的预测因素和剂量升级前抗体检测的效用:治疗成功定义为前房分级≤0.5+细胞、局部皮质类固醇≤1滴/天、口服泼尼松≤5毫克/天、黄斑水肿消退、血管造影炎症迹象消退,且未增加或升级任何治疗。与 "未检测 "组相比,"低抗体 "组的治疗成功率更高(HR:2.63,标准误差:1.19,P=0.031,95% CI 1.09 - 6.37)。在整个队列中,泛葡萄膜炎患者(n = 14)的治疗成功率低于前葡萄膜炎患者(n = 26)(HR:0.09,标准误差:0.11,P = 0.05,95% CI 0.01 - 0.99):结论:与未检查抗体的患者相比,抗阿达木单抗抗体较低的患者治疗成功率更高。这表明在剂量升级前检查抗体是有用的,低水平的抗体可能会带来成功优势。总体而言,泛葡萄膜炎患者升级剂量后的成功率较低,而前葡萄膜炎患者的成功率非常高,这表明临床医生在决定升级剂量或改变疗法时,某些疾病特征可能会起到指导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of Therapy Success in Weekly Adalimumab for Refractory Uveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

To determine predictors of treatment success after dose escalation of adalimumab, including the measurement of anti-adalimumab antibodies as a predictor of success.

Design

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

Methods

Setting: Single-center academic institution. Study population: Patients with noninfectious uveitis who were inadequately controlled or developed recurrent disease on every other week adalimumab and required dose escalation or therapy modification. Observation procedures: Patients who had anti-adalimumab antibodies checked with resultant low to intermediate levels were compared with patients who had no testing performed before adalimumab dose escalation. Of note, patients with testing and resultant high levels of anti-adalimumab antibodies were not escalated. Predictors of escalation success and utility of antibody testing before escalation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Main outcome measures: Treatment success defined as anterior chamber grade ≤0.5+ cell, topical corticosteroids ≤1 drop/d, oral prednisone ≤5 mg/d, resolution of macular edema, and resolution of angiographic signs of inflammation without any addition or escalation of therapy.

Results

A total of 24 patients had antibodies tested with low to intermediate levels (average: 32.3 ng/mL, range: 0-154 ng/mL), whereas 41 did not have antibody testing. A greater treatment success rate after escalation was observed among the “low antibody” group compared with the “no testing” group (hazard ratio: 2.63, standard error: 1.19, P = .031, 95% CI: 1.09-6.37). Among the entire cohort, patients with panuveitis (n = 14) had a lower treatment success rate compared with the reference of anterior uveitis (n = 26) (hazard ratio: 0.09, standard error: 0.11, P = .05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.99).

Conclusions

Patients with low anti-adalimumab antibodies had a greater treatment success than patients in whom antibodies were not checked. This suggests a utility to checking antibodies before dose escalation and that low levels of antibodies may confer a success advantage. Overall, patients with panuveitis had a lower rate of success after escalation while patients with anterior uveitis patients had a very high rate of success suggesting that certain disease characteristics may guide clinicians when determining who to escalate versus changing therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
期刊最新文献
One-Stage Orbital Decompression Combined with Intraoperative Muscle Relaxation for TAO: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sex-Related Differences in Speaker Introductions at Ophthalmology Grand Rounds. Repeatability of Microperimetry in areas of RPE and Photoreceptor loss in Geographic Atrophy supported by AI-based OCT biomarker quantification. Accuracy of 7 artificial intelligence based intraocular lens power calculation formulas in extremely long Caucasian eyes: Short title: AI-based IOL calculation in extra-long eyes. Comment on Ophthalmic Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Survival: Results from a Real-World Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1