Jacinta Winderlich BNutDietet, MClinRes, Bridget Little BSc, PGDipDiet, Felix Oberender MCPCH, PhD, FCICM, Tessa Bollard BSc, MHSc (Nutr & Diet), Tamara Farrell BSc, PGradDipDiet, Samantha Jenkins BNutDietet, Emma Landorf BNutDietet (Hons), Andrea McCall BSc (Hons), Jessica Menzies BNutrDiet, Katie O'Brien BSc (Hons), MSc, Carla Rowe BNutDietet, MSc (Nutr & Diet), Kirsten Sim BSc, MDiet, Melanie van der Wilk BSc, PGradDipDiet, Jemma Woodgate BHlthSc (Nutr & Diet), Eldho Paul PhD, Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD, Emma J. Ridley BNutriDietet, PhD
{"title":"儿科重症监护室婴幼儿肠内和口服营养支持的特点:一项描述性队列研究。","authors":"Jacinta Winderlich BNutDietet, MClinRes, Bridget Little BSc, PGDipDiet, Felix Oberender MCPCH, PhD, FCICM, Tessa Bollard BSc, MHSc (Nutr & Diet), Tamara Farrell BSc, PGradDipDiet, Samantha Jenkins BNutDietet, Emma Landorf BNutDietet (Hons), Andrea McCall BSc (Hons), Jessica Menzies BNutrDiet, Katie O'Brien BSc (Hons), MSc, Carla Rowe BNutDietet, MSc (Nutr & Diet), Kirsten Sim BSc, MDiet, Melanie van der Wilk BSc, PGradDipDiet, Jemma Woodgate BHlthSc (Nutr & Diet), Eldho Paul PhD, Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD, Emma J. Ridley BNutriDietet, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Children who are critically ill are often reliant on enteral and oral nutrition support. However, there is limited evidence to guide “what” to prescribe, and current practice is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe enteral nutrition prescription in children ≤2 years of age in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe oral nutrition support practices and factors associated with the use of increased energy and protein density nutrition support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Children ≤2 years of age admitted to participating PICUs over a 2-week period in June 2021 were enrolled. Data were collected on PICU admission days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 on the mode of nutrition, enteral and oral nutrition support prescription, and dietitian intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-four children were included (49 [58%] male; 79 [94%] ≤1 year of age). Enteral nutrition was administered to 79 (94%) children (with expressed breast milk in 45 [57%]). Forty-three children received formula as enteral nutrition. Increased energy and protein density formulas were provided to 14 (33%) children enterally, with concentrated standard infant formula powder being the most common (5 [12%]). Among children offered oral intake (22; 26%), three (14%) received oral nutrition support. Children who received increased energy and protein density enteral nutrition were more likely to receive dietitian intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In children ≤2 years of age admitted to PICU, expressed breast milk was provided to half of those requiring enteral nutrition and oral nutrition support prescription was infrequent. One third of children receiving formula via enteral nutrition received an increased energy and protein density feed, and this was strongly associated with dietitian intervention.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2672","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of enteral and oral nutrition support among infants and young children in the pediatric intensive care unit: A descriptive cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jacinta Winderlich BNutDietet, MClinRes, Bridget Little BSc, PGDipDiet, Felix Oberender MCPCH, PhD, FCICM, Tessa Bollard BSc, MHSc (Nutr & Diet), Tamara Farrell BSc, PGradDipDiet, Samantha Jenkins BNutDietet, Emma Landorf BNutDietet (Hons), Andrea McCall BSc (Hons), Jessica Menzies BNutrDiet, Katie O'Brien BSc (Hons), MSc, Carla Rowe BNutDietet, MSc (Nutr & Diet), Kirsten Sim BSc, MDiet, Melanie van der Wilk BSc, PGradDipDiet, Jemma Woodgate BHlthSc (Nutr & Diet), Eldho Paul PhD, Andrew A. Udy FCICM, PhD, Emma J. Ridley BNutriDietet, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpen.2672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children who are critically ill are often reliant on enteral and oral nutrition support. However, there is limited evidence to guide “what” to prescribe, and current practice is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe enteral nutrition prescription in children ≤2 years of age in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe oral nutrition support practices and factors associated with the use of increased energy and protein density nutrition support.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children ≤2 years of age admitted to participating PICUs over a 2-week period in June 2021 were enrolled. Data were collected on PICU admission days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 on the mode of nutrition, enteral and oral nutrition support prescription, and dietitian intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-four children were included (49 [58%] male; 79 [94%] ≤1 year of age). Enteral nutrition was administered to 79 (94%) children (with expressed breast milk in 45 [57%]). Forty-three children received formula as enteral nutrition. Increased energy and protein density formulas were provided to 14 (33%) children enterally, with concentrated standard infant formula powder being the most common (5 [12%]). Among children offered oral intake (22; 26%), three (14%) received oral nutrition support. Children who received increased energy and protein density enteral nutrition were more likely to receive dietitian intervention (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In children ≤2 years of age admitted to PICU, expressed breast milk was provided to half of those requiring enteral nutrition and oral nutrition support prescription was infrequent. One third of children receiving formula via enteral nutrition received an increased energy and protein density feed, and this was strongly associated with dietitian intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2672\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of enteral and oral nutrition support among infants and young children in the pediatric intensive care unit: A descriptive cohort study
Background
Children who are critically ill are often reliant on enteral and oral nutrition support. However, there is limited evidence to guide “what” to prescribe, and current practice is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to describe enteral nutrition prescription in children ≤2 years of age in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The secondary objectives were to describe oral nutrition support practices and factors associated with the use of increased energy and protein density nutrition support.
Methods
Children ≤2 years of age admitted to participating PICUs over a 2-week period in June 2021 were enrolled. Data were collected on PICU admission days 1 to 7, 14, 21, and 28 on the mode of nutrition, enteral and oral nutrition support prescription, and dietitian intervention.
Results
Eighty-four children were included (49 [58%] male; 79 [94%] ≤1 year of age). Enteral nutrition was administered to 79 (94%) children (with expressed breast milk in 45 [57%]). Forty-three children received formula as enteral nutrition. Increased energy and protein density formulas were provided to 14 (33%) children enterally, with concentrated standard infant formula powder being the most common (5 [12%]). Among children offered oral intake (22; 26%), three (14%) received oral nutrition support. Children who received increased energy and protein density enteral nutrition were more likely to receive dietitian intervention (P = 0.002).
Conclusion
In children ≤2 years of age admitted to PICU, expressed breast milk was provided to half of those requiring enteral nutrition and oral nutrition support prescription was infrequent. One third of children receiving formula via enteral nutrition received an increased energy and protein density feed, and this was strongly associated with dietitian intervention.