Christiana Westlin, Andrew J Guthrie, Sara Paredes-Echeverri, Julie Maggio, Sara Finkelstein, Ellen Godena, Daniel Millstein, Julie MacLean, Jessica Ranford, Jennifer Freeburn, Caitlin Adams, Christopher Stephen, Ibai Diez, David L Perez
{"title":"利用脑部核磁共振成像结构特征对功能性神经紊乱进行机器学习分类。","authors":"Christiana Westlin, Andrew J Guthrie, Sara Paredes-Echeverri, Julie Maggio, Sara Finkelstein, Ellen Godena, Daniel Millstein, Julie MacLean, Jessica Ranford, Jennifer Freeburn, Caitlin Adams, Christopher Stephen, Ibai Diez, David L Perez","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2024-333499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain imaging studies investigating grey matter in functional neurological disorder (FND) have used univariate approaches to report group-level differences compared with healthy controls (HCs). However, these findings have limited translatability because they do not differentiate patients from controls at the individual-level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>183 participants were prospectively recruited across three groups: 61 patients with mixed FND (FND-mixed), 61 age-matched and sex-matched HCs and 61 age, sex, depression and anxiety-matched psychiatric controls (PCs). Radial basis function support vector machine classifiers with cross-validation were used to distinguish individuals with FND from HCs and PCs using 134 <i>FreeSurfer</i>-derived grey matter MRI features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with FND-mixed were differentiated from HCs with an accuracy of 0.66 (p=0.005; area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.74); this sample was also distinguished from PCs with an accuracy of 0.60 (p=0.038; AUROC=0.56). When focusing on the functional motor disorder subtype (FND-motor, n=46), a classifier robustly differentiated these patients from HCs (accuracy=0.72; p=0.002; AUROC=0.80). FND-motor could not be distinguished from PCs, and the functional seizures subtype (n=23) could not be classified against either control group. Important regions contributing to statistically significant multivariate classifications included the cingulate gyrus, hippocampal subfields and amygdalar nuclei. Correctly versus incorrectly classified participants did not differ across a range of tested psychometric variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the interconnection of brain structure and function in the pathophysiology of FND and demonstrate the feasibility of using structural MRI to classify the disorder. Out-of-sample replication and larger-scale classifier efforts incorporating psychiatric and neurological controls are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning classification of functional neurological disorder using structural brain MRI features.\",\"authors\":\"Christiana Westlin, Andrew J Guthrie, Sara Paredes-Echeverri, Julie Maggio, Sara Finkelstein, Ellen Godena, Daniel Millstein, Julie MacLean, Jessica Ranford, Jennifer Freeburn, Caitlin Adams, Christopher Stephen, Ibai Diez, David L Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2024-333499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain imaging studies investigating grey matter in functional neurological disorder (FND) have used univariate approaches to report group-level differences compared with healthy controls (HCs). However, these findings have limited translatability because they do not differentiate patients from controls at the individual-level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>183 participants were prospectively recruited across three groups: 61 patients with mixed FND (FND-mixed), 61 age-matched and sex-matched HCs and 61 age, sex, depression and anxiety-matched psychiatric controls (PCs). Radial basis function support vector machine classifiers with cross-validation were used to distinguish individuals with FND from HCs and PCs using 134 <i>FreeSurfer</i>-derived grey matter MRI features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with FND-mixed were differentiated from HCs with an accuracy of 0.66 (p=0.005; area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.74); this sample was also distinguished from PCs with an accuracy of 0.60 (p=0.038; AUROC=0.56). When focusing on the functional motor disorder subtype (FND-motor, n=46), a classifier robustly differentiated these patients from HCs (accuracy=0.72; p=0.002; AUROC=0.80). FND-motor could not be distinguished from PCs, and the functional seizures subtype (n=23) could not be classified against either control group. Important regions contributing to statistically significant multivariate classifications included the cingulate gyrus, hippocampal subfields and amygdalar nuclei. Correctly versus incorrectly classified participants did not differ across a range of tested psychometric variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the interconnection of brain structure and function in the pathophysiology of FND and demonstrate the feasibility of using structural MRI to classify the disorder. Out-of-sample replication and larger-scale classifier efforts incorporating psychiatric and neurological controls are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-333499\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-333499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:调查功能性神经障碍性疾病(FND)灰质的脑成像研究使用单变量方法报告与健康对照组(HCs)相比的组间差异。方法:前瞻性地招募了 183 名参与者,分为三组:61 名混合型 FND 患者(FND-mixed)、61 名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照组(HCs)以及 61 名年龄、性别、抑郁和焦虑匹配的精神对照组(PCs)。利用134个FreeSurfer衍生的灰质MRI特征,使用径向基函数支持向量机分类器进行交叉验证,将FND患者与HC和PC区分开来:混合型 FND 患者与 HC 患者的区分准确率为 0.66(p=0.005;接收操作特征下面积 (AUROC)=0.74);该样本与 PC 患者的区分准确率为 0.60(p=0.038;AUROC=0.56)。当关注功能性运动障碍亚型(FND-motor,n=46)时,分类器能将这些患者与 HC 区分开来(准确率=0.72;p=0.002;AUROC=0.80)。FND-运动型无法与PC区分开来,功能性癫痫发作亚型(n=23)也无法与对照组区分开来。对多变量分类具有统计学意义的重要区域包括扣带回、海马亚区和杏仁核。在一系列测试的心理测量变量中,正确分类与错误分类的参与者并无差异:这些发现强调了大脑结构和功能在FND病理生理学中的相互联系,并证明了使用结构性核磁共振成像对该疾病进行分类的可行性。需要进行样本外复制和更大规模的分类工作,并纳入精神和神经控制。
Machine learning classification of functional neurological disorder using structural brain MRI features.
Background: Brain imaging studies investigating grey matter in functional neurological disorder (FND) have used univariate approaches to report group-level differences compared with healthy controls (HCs). However, these findings have limited translatability because they do not differentiate patients from controls at the individual-level.
Methods: 183 participants were prospectively recruited across three groups: 61 patients with mixed FND (FND-mixed), 61 age-matched and sex-matched HCs and 61 age, sex, depression and anxiety-matched psychiatric controls (PCs). Radial basis function support vector machine classifiers with cross-validation were used to distinguish individuals with FND from HCs and PCs using 134 FreeSurfer-derived grey matter MRI features.
Results: Patients with FND-mixed were differentiated from HCs with an accuracy of 0.66 (p=0.005; area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.74); this sample was also distinguished from PCs with an accuracy of 0.60 (p=0.038; AUROC=0.56). When focusing on the functional motor disorder subtype (FND-motor, n=46), a classifier robustly differentiated these patients from HCs (accuracy=0.72; p=0.002; AUROC=0.80). FND-motor could not be distinguished from PCs, and the functional seizures subtype (n=23) could not be classified against either control group. Important regions contributing to statistically significant multivariate classifications included the cingulate gyrus, hippocampal subfields and amygdalar nuclei. Correctly versus incorrectly classified participants did not differ across a range of tested psychometric variables.
Conclusions: These findings underscore the interconnection of brain structure and function in the pathophysiology of FND and demonstrate the feasibility of using structural MRI to classify the disorder. Out-of-sample replication and larger-scale classifier efforts incorporating psychiatric and neurological controls are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.