Maria G. Matta , Laura Schreier , Augusto Lavalle-Cobo , Sebastian Garcia-Zamora , Agustina Ferraresi , Angeles Madsen , Sofia Bellini , Guadalupe Ramos , Paula Roubicek , Pablo Corral
{"title":"临床病情稳定患者脂蛋白(a)的时间变异性:对心血管风险评估的影响。","authors":"Maria G. Matta , Laura Schreier , Augusto Lavalle-Cobo , Sebastian Garcia-Zamora , Agustina Ferraresi , Angeles Madsen , Sofia Bellini , Guadalupe Ramos , Paula Roubicek , Pablo Corral","doi":"10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet it is often overlooked in routine clinical assessments. As a primarily genetically determined risk factor, the traditional recommendation is to assess its level once in a lifetime, as the variability of Lp(a) over time is considered to be minimal. This study aims to evaluate the potential variability of Lp(a) in clinically stable patients and investigate factors contributing to the lack of stable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on a sample of adult patients attending a lipid clinic. Participants with at least two Lp(a) measurements taken with a minimum interval of four months were included. Lp(a) measurements were performed using the immunoturbidimetric assay. Variability in Lp(a) values was calculated as a percentage change from baseline, with participants exceeding a 25% change classified as having hypervariable Lp(a) levels. Additional clinical and biochemical variables were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>61 participants with 171 Lp(a) determinations were included. Thirty-four percent exhibited a variability of 25% or higher (hypervariable). Men showed slightly greater variability than women. Changes in Lp(a) categories were observed among hypervariable patients, with some participants experiencing an increase while others showed a decrease. Menopause was present in all the women with hypervariable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests reconsidering the reliance on a single Lp(a) measurement for assessing cardiovascular risk. Repeat measurements, particularly in borderline cases, may be beneficial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18578,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica","volume":"163 9","pages":"Pages 436-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal variability of Lp(a) in clinically stable patients: Implications for cardiovascular risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Maria G. Matta , Laura Schreier , Augusto Lavalle-Cobo , Sebastian Garcia-Zamora , Agustina Ferraresi , Angeles Madsen , Sofia Bellini , Guadalupe Ramos , Paula Roubicek , Pablo Corral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medcli.2024.05.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet it is often overlooked in routine clinical assessments. As a primarily genetically determined risk factor, the traditional recommendation is to assess its level once in a lifetime, as the variability of Lp(a) over time is considered to be minimal. This study aims to evaluate the potential variability of Lp(a) in clinically stable patients and investigate factors contributing to the lack of stable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on a sample of adult patients attending a lipid clinic. Participants with at least two Lp(a) measurements taken with a minimum interval of four months were included. Lp(a) measurements were performed using the immunoturbidimetric assay. Variability in Lp(a) values was calculated as a percentage change from baseline, with participants exceeding a 25% change classified as having hypervariable Lp(a) levels. Additional clinical and biochemical variables were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>61 participants with 171 Lp(a) determinations were included. Thirty-four percent exhibited a variability of 25% or higher (hypervariable). Men showed slightly greater variability than women. Changes in Lp(a) categories were observed among hypervariable patients, with some participants experiencing an increase while others showed a decrease. Menopause was present in all the women with hypervariable levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests reconsidering the reliance on a single Lp(a) measurement for assessing cardiovascular risk. Repeat measurements, particularly in borderline cases, may be beneficial.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Clinica\",\"volume\":\"163 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 436-441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025775324004007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025775324004007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Temporal variability of Lp(a) in clinically stable patients: Implications for cardiovascular risk assessment
Objectives
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet it is often overlooked in routine clinical assessments. As a primarily genetically determined risk factor, the traditional recommendation is to assess its level once in a lifetime, as the variability of Lp(a) over time is considered to be minimal. This study aims to evaluate the potential variability of Lp(a) in clinically stable patients and investigate factors contributing to the lack of stable levels.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on a sample of adult patients attending a lipid clinic. Participants with at least two Lp(a) measurements taken with a minimum interval of four months were included. Lp(a) measurements were performed using the immunoturbidimetric assay. Variability in Lp(a) values was calculated as a percentage change from baseline, with participants exceeding a 25% change classified as having hypervariable Lp(a) levels. Additional clinical and biochemical variables were assessed.
Results
61 participants with 171 Lp(a) determinations were included. Thirty-four percent exhibited a variability of 25% or higher (hypervariable). Men showed slightly greater variability than women. Changes in Lp(a) categories were observed among hypervariable patients, with some participants experiencing an increase while others showed a decrease. Menopause was present in all the women with hypervariable levels.
Conclusion
Our study suggests reconsidering the reliance on a single Lp(a) measurement for assessing cardiovascular risk. Repeat measurements, particularly in borderline cases, may be beneficial.
期刊介绍:
Medicina Clínica, fundada en 1943, es una publicación quincenal dedicada a la promoción de la investigación y de la práctica clínica entre los especialistas de la medicina interna, así como otras especialidades. Son características fundamentales de esta publicación el rigor científico y metodológico de sus artículos, la actualidad de los temas y, sobre todo, su sentido práctico, buscando siempre que la información sea de la mayor utilidad en la práctica clínica.