脊髓损伤患者的多重用药:比较药物类别、医疗并发症和医疗保健使用指标的匹配队列分析(24 个月随访)。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892
Nicholas Dietz, Victoria Alkin, Nitin Agarwal, Martin Flores Bjurström, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Dengzhi Wang, Mayur Sharma, Doniel Drazin, Maxwell Boakye
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者的多重用药:比较药物类别、医疗并发症和医疗保健使用指标的匹配队列分析(24 个月随访)。","authors":"Nicholas Dietz, Victoria Alkin, Nitin Agarwal, Martin Flores Bjurström, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Dengzhi Wang, Mayur Sharma, Doniel Drazin, Maxwell Boakye","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Dietz, Victoria Alkin, Nitin Agarwal, Martin Flores Bjurström, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Dengzhi Wang, Mayur Sharma, Doniel Drazin, Maxwell Boakye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2375892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者多药治疗很常见,容易增加不良事件的风险。本文探讨了脊髓损伤患者多药治疗的长期健康后果和经济负担:设计:回顾性队列:方法:查询 IBM Marketscan Research Databases 以索赔为基础的数据集,搜索随访 2 年的 SCI 成年患者:分析了两个匹配队列:有多重药物治疗和没有多重药物治疗的队列,分析了指数住院、再入院、付款和健康结果:共纳入了 11 569 名 SCI 患者,其中 7235 人(63%)属于多药组,他们在两年内服用的药物中位数为 11 种。阿片类镇痛药是最常见的药物,在符合多种药物标准的 SCI 患者中占 57%,其次是抗抑郁药(46%)和肌肉松弛剂(40%)。与非多重用药组(45%)相比,多重用药组的肺炎风险增加(58%),2 年后尿路感染(79% 对 63%)、伤口感染(30% 对 21%)、抑郁(76% 对 57%)和药物不良事件(24% 对 15%)的风险也增加了。2年后,多药治疗的综合医疗费用中位数更高(44 333美元对10 937美元,P 结论:大多数 SCI 患者都符合多药治疗的标准,其中近 60% 的患者服用阿片类药物和副作用风险较高的药物。多药治疗与 SCI 患者在两年内患肺炎、抑郁症、尿路感染、药物不良事件和急诊就诊的更高风险相关,且在伤后一年内的总体医疗费用高出四倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury: Matched cohort analysis comparing drug classes, medical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics with 24-month follow-up.

Objective: Polypharmacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) is common and predisposes patients to increased risk of adverse events. Evaluation of long-term health consequences and economic burden of polypharmacy in patients with SCI is explored.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Methods: The IBM Marketscan Research Databases claims-based dataset was queried to search for adult patients with SCI with a 2-year follow-up.

Participants: Two matched cohorts were analyzed: those with and without polypharmacy, analyzing index hospitalization, readmissions, payments, and health outcomes.

Results: A total of 11 569 individuals with SCI were included, of which 7235 (63%) were in the polypharmacy group who took a median of 11 separate drugs over two years. Opioid analgesics were the most common medication, present in 57% of patients with SCI meeting the criteria of polypharmacy, followed by antidepressant medications (46%) and muscle relaxants (40%). Risk of pneumonia was increased for the polypharmacy group (58%) compared to the non-polypharmacy group (45%), as were urinary tract infection (79% versus 63%), wound infection (30% versus 21%), depression (76% versus 57%), and adverse drug events (24% versus 15%) at 2 years. Combined median healthcare payments were higher in polypharmacy at 2 years ($44 333 vs. $10 937, P < .0001).

Conclusion: Majority of individuals with SCI met the criteria for polypharmacy with nearly 60% of those prescribed opioids and taking drugs from high-risk side effect profiles. Polypharmacy in SCI was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia, depression, urinary tract infections, adverse drug events, and emergency room visits over two years with four times higher overall healthcare payments at 1-year post-injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1