与使用心室外引流术相关的感染风险因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Hospital Infection Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.004
Alessandra Yuri Takehana de Andrade, Adriane Reis Barletta Canicoba, Ramon Antônio Oliveira, Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Vanessa de Brito Poveda
{"title":"与使用心室外引流术相关的感染风险因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Alessandra Yuri Takehana de Andrade, Adriane Reis Barletta Canicoba, Ramon Antônio Oliveira, Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Vanessa de Brito Poveda","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection associated with the use of the External Ventricular Drainage (EVD) catheter in neurosurgery is linked to high morbidity and mortality, and various mechanisms are related to its occurrence. This systematic review aims to summarise and update the risk factors associated with EVD-related infection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis, utilising grey literature and indexed databases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Thirty studies were included, of which nine contributed to the meta-analysis. The reported frequency of EVD-related infection varied from 1.9% to 36%, and the diagnostic criteria for infection were not standardized, with the presence of a positive culture being the most common. The primary microorganisms identified were Staphylococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Key risk factors included duration of catheterisation, frequency of maintenance care, reinsertion, or number of drains. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant effect in patients with prolonged use of EVDs, with an increase in risk of 1.47 (OR) [CI 95%, 1.03; 2,10] for each day of use (p=0.03), and showed that the number of cerebrospinal fluid collections was higher in the group with infection (p=0.00), while a greater number of EVDs used was related to a significant effect on infection rates (p=0.00), which were revealed from studies with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicated studies with high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, with risk factors associated with the maintenance or management of EVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for infection associated with the use of external ventricular drainage: a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Yuri Takehana de Andrade, Adriane Reis Barletta Canicoba, Ramon Antônio Oliveira, Juliana Rizzo Gnatta, Vanessa de Brito Poveda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infection associated with the use of the External Ventricular Drainage (EVD) catheter in neurosurgery is linked to high morbidity and mortality, and various mechanisms are related to its occurrence. This systematic review aims to summarise and update the risk factors associated with EVD-related infection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis, utilising grey literature and indexed databases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Thirty studies were included, of which nine contributed to the meta-analysis. The reported frequency of EVD-related infection varied from 1.9% to 36%, and the diagnostic criteria for infection were not standardized, with the presence of a positive culture being the most common. The primary microorganisms identified were Staphylococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Key risk factors included duration of catheterisation, frequency of maintenance care, reinsertion, or number of drains. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant effect in patients with prolonged use of EVDs, with an increase in risk of 1.47 (OR) [CI 95%, 1.03; 2,10] for each day of use (p=0.03), and showed that the number of cerebrospinal fluid collections was higher in the group with infection (p=0.00), while a greater number of EVDs used was related to a significant effect on infection rates (p=0.00), which were revealed from studies with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicated studies with high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, with risk factors associated with the maintenance or management of EVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.07.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在神经外科手术中使用脑室外引流(EVD)导管引起的感染与高发病率和高死亡率有关,其发生机制多种多样。本系统综述旨在总结和更新与 EVD 相关感染有关的风险因素:方法:利用灰色文献和索引数据库进行系统综述和荟萃分析:纳入了 30 项研究,其中 9 项参与了荟萃分析。报告的 EVD 相关感染频率从 1.9% 到 36% 不等,感染的诊断标准没有统一,最常见的是培养阳性。主要风险因素包括导管插入时间、维护护理频率、再次插入或引流管数量。荟萃分析的结果显示,长期使用 EVDs 的患者会受到显著影响,每使用一天,风险增加 1.47 (OR) [CI 95%, 1.03; 2,10] (p=0. 03)。03),并显示感染组的脑脊液采集数量更高(P=0.00),而使用更多的 EVDs 与感染率的显著影响有关(P=0.00),这些结果均来自异质性较低的研究(I2:0%):研究结果表明,异质性较高且证据质量较低的研究显示了与EVD的维持或管理相关的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for infection associated with the use of external ventricular drainage: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Background: Infection associated with the use of the External Ventricular Drainage (EVD) catheter in neurosurgery is linked to high morbidity and mortality, and various mechanisms are related to its occurrence. This systematic review aims to summarise and update the risk factors associated with EVD-related infection.

Method: Systematic review with meta-analysis, utilising grey literature and indexed databases.

Findings: Thirty studies were included, of which nine contributed to the meta-analysis. The reported frequency of EVD-related infection varied from 1.9% to 36%, and the diagnostic criteria for infection were not standardized, with the presence of a positive culture being the most common. The primary microorganisms identified were Staphylococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. Key risk factors included duration of catheterisation, frequency of maintenance care, reinsertion, or number of drains. The results of the meta-analysis showed a significant effect in patients with prolonged use of EVDs, with an increase in risk of 1.47 (OR) [CI 95%, 1.03; 2,10] for each day of use (p=0.03), and showed that the number of cerebrospinal fluid collections was higher in the group with infection (p=0.00), while a greater number of EVDs used was related to a significant effect on infection rates (p=0.00), which were revealed from studies with low heterogeneity (I2: 0%).

Conclusion: The results indicated studies with high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence, with risk factors associated with the maintenance or management of EVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Povidone Iodine vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Preoperative Skin Antisepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Evolution of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales over a 5-year period: Worrying increase in acquired cases and patients residing abroad. First detected Proteus mirabilis coharboring VIM-1, VIM-2 and VIM-13 from the largest Bulgarian Hospital. Infection prevention and control risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in health workers: a global, multicentre case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1