José J. Saucedo-Gutierrez , Monserrat Escamilla-García , Aldo Amaro-Reyes , Andrés Carrillo-Garmendia , Luis A. Madrigal-Pérez , Carlos Regalado-González , José Á. Granados-Arvizu
{"title":"糠醛和乙酸对稻壳霉菌生物能和发酵性能的不同影响。","authors":"José J. Saucedo-Gutierrez , Monserrat Escamilla-García , Aldo Amaro-Reyes , Andrés Carrillo-Garmendia , Luis A. Madrigal-Pérez , Carlos Regalado-González , José Á. Granados-Arvizu","doi":"10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lignocellulosic material is a leading carbon source for economically viable biotechnological processes; however, compounds such furfural and acetic acid exhibit toxicity to yeasts. Nonetheless, research about the molecular mechanism of furfural and acetic acid toxicity is still scarce in yeasts like <em>Scheffersomyces stipitis</em>. Thus, this study aims to elucidate the impact of furfural and acetic acid on <em>S. stipitis</em> regarding bioenergetic and fermentation parameters. Here, we provide evidence that furfural and acetic acid induce a delay in cell growth and extend the lag phase. The mitochondrial membrane potential decreased in all treatments with no significant differences between inhibitors or concentrations. Interestingly, reactive oxygen species increased when the inhibitor concentrations were from 0.1 to 0.3 % (v/v). The glycolytic flux was not significantly (<em>p</em> > 0.05) altered by acetic acid, but furfural caused different effects. Ethanol production decreased significantly (4.32 g·L<sup>-1</sup> in furfural and 5.06 g·L<sup>-1</sup> in acetic acid) compared to the control (26.3 g·L<sup>-1</sup>). In contrast, biomass levels were not significantly different in most treatments compared to the control. This study enhances our understanding of the effects of furfural and acetic acid at the mitochondrial level in a pentose-fermenting yeast like <em>S. stipitis</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential impacts of furfural and acetic acid on the bioenergetics and fermentation performance of Scheffersomyces stipitis\",\"authors\":\"José J. Saucedo-Gutierrez , Monserrat Escamilla-García , Aldo Amaro-Reyes , Andrés Carrillo-Garmendia , Luis A. Madrigal-Pérez , Carlos Regalado-González , José Á. Granados-Arvizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lignocellulosic material is a leading carbon source for economically viable biotechnological processes; however, compounds such furfural and acetic acid exhibit toxicity to yeasts. Nonetheless, research about the molecular mechanism of furfural and acetic acid toxicity is still scarce in yeasts like <em>Scheffersomyces stipitis</em>. Thus, this study aims to elucidate the impact of furfural and acetic acid on <em>S. stipitis</em> regarding bioenergetic and fermentation parameters. Here, we provide evidence that furfural and acetic acid induce a delay in cell growth and extend the lag phase. The mitochondrial membrane potential decreased in all treatments with no significant differences between inhibitors or concentrations. Interestingly, reactive oxygen species increased when the inhibitor concentrations were from 0.1 to 0.3 % (v/v). The glycolytic flux was not significantly (<em>p</em> > 0.05) altered by acetic acid, but furfural caused different effects. Ethanol production decreased significantly (4.32 g·L<sup>-1</sup> in furfural and 5.06 g·L<sup>-1</sup> in acetic acid) compared to the control (26.3 g·L<sup>-1</sup>). In contrast, biomass levels were not significantly different in most treatments compared to the control. This study enhances our understanding of the effects of furfural and acetic acid at the mitochondrial level in a pentose-fermenting yeast like <em>S. stipitis</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087184524000513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential impacts of furfural and acetic acid on the bioenergetics and fermentation performance of Scheffersomyces stipitis
Lignocellulosic material is a leading carbon source for economically viable biotechnological processes; however, compounds such furfural and acetic acid exhibit toxicity to yeasts. Nonetheless, research about the molecular mechanism of furfural and acetic acid toxicity is still scarce in yeasts like Scheffersomyces stipitis. Thus, this study aims to elucidate the impact of furfural and acetic acid on S. stipitis regarding bioenergetic and fermentation parameters. Here, we provide evidence that furfural and acetic acid induce a delay in cell growth and extend the lag phase. The mitochondrial membrane potential decreased in all treatments with no significant differences between inhibitors or concentrations. Interestingly, reactive oxygen species increased when the inhibitor concentrations were from 0.1 to 0.3 % (v/v). The glycolytic flux was not significantly (p > 0.05) altered by acetic acid, but furfural caused different effects. Ethanol production decreased significantly (4.32 g·L-1 in furfural and 5.06 g·L-1 in acetic acid) compared to the control (26.3 g·L-1). In contrast, biomass levels were not significantly different in most treatments compared to the control. This study enhances our understanding of the effects of furfural and acetic acid at the mitochondrial level in a pentose-fermenting yeast like S. stipitis.