生成式人工智能模型对零售企业公民数据科学家绩效的影响

IF 8.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers in Industry Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.compind.2024.104128
{"title":"生成式人工智能模型对零售企业公民数据科学家绩效的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.compind.2024.104128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models serve as powerful tools for organizations aiming to integrate advanced data analysis and automation into their applications and services. Citizen data scientists—individuals without formal training but skilled in data analysis—combine domain expertise with analytical skills, making them invaluable assets in the retail sector. Generative AI models can further enhance their performance, offering a cost-effective alternative to hiring professional data scientists. However, it is unclear how AI models can effectively contribute to this development and what challenges may arise. This study explores the impact of generative AI models on citizen data scientists in retail firms. We investigate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these models. Survey data from 268 retail companies is used to develop and validate a new model. Findings highlight that misinformation, lack of explainability, biased content generation, and data security and privacy concerns in generative AI models are major factors affecting citizen data scientists’ performance. Practical implications suggest that generative AI can empower retail firms by enabling advanced data science techniques and real-time decision-making. However, firms must address drawbacks and threats in generative AI models through robust policies and collaboration between domain experts and AI developers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55219,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Industry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of generative artificial intelligence models on the performance of citizen data scientists in retail firms\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compind.2024.104128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models serve as powerful tools for organizations aiming to integrate advanced data analysis and automation into their applications and services. Citizen data scientists—individuals without formal training but skilled in data analysis—combine domain expertise with analytical skills, making them invaluable assets in the retail sector. Generative AI models can further enhance their performance, offering a cost-effective alternative to hiring professional data scientists. However, it is unclear how AI models can effectively contribute to this development and what challenges may arise. This study explores the impact of generative AI models on citizen data scientists in retail firms. We investigate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these models. Survey data from 268 retail companies is used to develop and validate a new model. Findings highlight that misinformation, lack of explainability, biased content generation, and data security and privacy concerns in generative AI models are major factors affecting citizen data scientists’ performance. Practical implications suggest that generative AI can empower retail firms by enabling advanced data science techniques and real-time decision-making. However, firms must address drawbacks and threats in generative AI models through robust policies and collaboration between domain experts and AI developers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Industry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361524000563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361524000563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于旨在将高级数据分析和自动化集成到其应用程序和服务中的组织而言,生成式人工智能(AI)模型是一种强大的工具。公民数据科学家--没有受过正规培训但精通数据分析的个人--将领域专业知识与分析技能相结合,成为零售业的宝贵财富。生成式人工智能模型可以进一步提高他们的性能,为聘用专业数据科学家提供了一个具有成本效益的替代方案。然而,目前还不清楚人工智能模型如何有效促进这一发展,以及可能会出现哪些挑战。本研究探讨了生成式人工智能模型对零售企业公民数据科学家的影响。我们调查了这些模型的优势、劣势、机遇和威胁。来自 268 家零售公司的调查数据被用于开发和验证一个新模型。研究结果表明,生成式人工智能模型中的错误信息、缺乏可解释性、内容生成有偏差以及数据安全和隐私问题是影响公民数据科学家表现的主要因素。实际意义表明,生成式人工智能可以通过支持先进的数据科学技术和实时决策来增强零售企业的能力。然而,企业必须通过健全的政策以及领域专家与人工智能开发人员之间的合作来解决生成式人工智能模型中存在的弊端和威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of generative artificial intelligence models on the performance of citizen data scientists in retail firms

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) models serve as powerful tools for organizations aiming to integrate advanced data analysis and automation into their applications and services. Citizen data scientists—individuals without formal training but skilled in data analysis—combine domain expertise with analytical skills, making them invaluable assets in the retail sector. Generative AI models can further enhance their performance, offering a cost-effective alternative to hiring professional data scientists. However, it is unclear how AI models can effectively contribute to this development and what challenges may arise. This study explores the impact of generative AI models on citizen data scientists in retail firms. We investigate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of these models. Survey data from 268 retail companies is used to develop and validate a new model. Findings highlight that misinformation, lack of explainability, biased content generation, and data security and privacy concerns in generative AI models are major factors affecting citizen data scientists’ performance. Practical implications suggest that generative AI can empower retail firms by enabling advanced data science techniques and real-time decision-making. However, firms must address drawbacks and threats in generative AI models through robust policies and collaboration between domain experts and AI developers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The objective of Computers in Industry is to present original, high-quality, application-oriented research papers that: • Illuminate emerging trends and possibilities in the utilization of Information and Communication Technology in industry; • Establish connections or integrations across various technology domains within the expansive realm of computer applications for industry; • Foster connections or integrations across diverse application areas of ICT in industry.
期刊最新文献
Rapid quality control for recycled coarse aggregates (RCA) streams: Multi-sensor integration for advanced contaminant detection Apple varieties and growth prediction with time series classification based on deep learning to impact the harvesting decisions Maximum subspace transferability discriminant analysis: A new cross-domain similarity measure for wind-turbine fault transfer diagnosis Dual channel visible graph convolutional neural network for microleakage monitoring of pipeline weld homalographic cracks Video-based automatic people counting for public transport: On-bus versus off-bus deployment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1