竞争性联邦制、个人自治和公民主权

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Kyklos Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/kykl.12405
Viktor J. Vanberg
{"title":"竞争性联邦制、个人自治和公民主权","authors":"Viktor J. Vanberg","doi":"10.1111/kykl.12405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the <jats:italic>theory of competitive federalism</jats:italic>, focusing specifically on Hayek's and Buchanan's significant contributions to this theory. Looking at the rivalry between sub‐units in federal systems and drawing an analogy between <jats:italic>market competition</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>intergovernmental competition</jats:italic>, the theory of competitive federalism stresses the critical role viable exit options play as operating force in both arenas. The principal claim argued for in this paper is that by exclusively focusing on exit in its <jats:italic>territorial dimension</jats:italic>, the theory of competitive federalism obfuscates the fact that “exit” can mean two critically different things in federal systems. It can mean <jats:italic>exiting from the territory</jats:italic> over which a government exercises its assigned authority, and it can mean exiting from a polity in the sense of <jats:italic>giving up one's membership status</jats:italic> in the respective community. The paper discusses the nature, the significance, and the implications of the difference between these two kinds of exit.","PeriodicalId":47739,"journal":{"name":"Kyklos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive federalism, individual autonomy, and citizen sovereignty\",\"authors\":\"Viktor J. Vanberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/kykl.12405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines the <jats:italic>theory of competitive federalism</jats:italic>, focusing specifically on Hayek's and Buchanan's significant contributions to this theory. Looking at the rivalry between sub‐units in federal systems and drawing an analogy between <jats:italic>market competition</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>intergovernmental competition</jats:italic>, the theory of competitive federalism stresses the critical role viable exit options play as operating force in both arenas. The principal claim argued for in this paper is that by exclusively focusing on exit in its <jats:italic>territorial dimension</jats:italic>, the theory of competitive federalism obfuscates the fact that “exit” can mean two critically different things in federal systems. It can mean <jats:italic>exiting from the territory</jats:italic> over which a government exercises its assigned authority, and it can mean exiting from a polity in the sense of <jats:italic>giving up one's membership status</jats:italic> in the respective community. The paper discusses the nature, the significance, and the implications of the difference between these two kinds of exit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kyklos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kyklos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyklos","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了竞争性联邦制理论,特别侧重于哈耶克和布坎南对这一理论的重要贡献。竞争性联邦制理论着眼于联邦制度中次级单位之间的竞争,并将市场竞争与政府间竞争相类比,强调了可行的退出方案作为这两个领域的运作力量所发挥的关键作用。本文论证的主要主张是,竞争性联邦制理论只关注退出的领土层面,混淆了 "退出 "在联邦制度中可以有两种截然不同的含义这一事实。它可以是指退出政府行使其指定权力的领土,也可以是指退出政体,即放弃各自社区的成员地位。本文讨论了这两种退出的性质、意义和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competitive federalism, individual autonomy, and citizen sovereignty
The paper examines the theory of competitive federalism, focusing specifically on Hayek's and Buchanan's significant contributions to this theory. Looking at the rivalry between sub‐units in federal systems and drawing an analogy between market competition and intergovernmental competition, the theory of competitive federalism stresses the critical role viable exit options play as operating force in both arenas. The principal claim argued for in this paper is that by exclusively focusing on exit in its territorial dimension, the theory of competitive federalism obfuscates the fact that “exit” can mean two critically different things in federal systems. It can mean exiting from the territory over which a government exercises its assigned authority, and it can mean exiting from a polity in the sense of giving up one's membership status in the respective community. The paper discusses the nature, the significance, and the implications of the difference between these two kinds of exit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kyklos
Kyklos ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: KYKLOS views economics as a social science and as such favours contributions dealing with issues relevant to contemporary society, as well as economic policy applications. Since its inception nearly 60 years ago, KYKLOS has earned a worldwide reputation for publishing a broad range of articles from international scholars on real world issues. KYKLOS encourages unorthodox, original approaches to topical economic and social issues with a multinational application, and promises to give fresh insights into topics of worldwide interest
期刊最新文献
Revisiting the impact of corruption on income inequality worldwide The electoral consequences of the political divide on climate change Work organization in social enterprises: A source of job satisfaction? Economic freedom and the quality of education The decoy effect only works when the number of options is less than six
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1