编制高等教育机构变革阻力来源量表并进行心理计量验证

Favián González, Manuela Pardo-del-Val, Ana Redondo
{"title":"编制高等教育机构变革阻力来源量表并进行心理计量验证","authors":"Favián González, Manuela Pardo-del-Val, Ana Redondo","doi":"10.1108/jamr-10-2023-0286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of the present study was to develop a measurement model to identify sources of resistance to change (RC) based on a previous systematic review.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The sample comprised 121 participants (faculty, students, graduates, and employees). Twenty-three items were assessed in four distinct stages: observation, exploration, confirmation, and communication. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis ensured the validity and reliability of the measurement process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The final 14-item model consisted of four groups: “Personalities averse to change”; “Limited participation in the change process”; “Dominant sociocultural predisposition”; and “Weak managerial commitment to change.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>It is hoped that the study will encourage further diagnostic examinations and assessments of the structural relationships associated with RC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The present study expands our understanding of RC source typologies, the majority of which have focused on the individual and the organization. Higher education institutions bear a responsibility to initiate change to align with evolving environmental demands, but their endeavors are often subject to obstacles and delays stemming from individual and collective influences. To manage efficiently the conceptualization, planning, implementation, and management of change initiatives, we must comprehend and assess the primary sources of RC within such institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions\",\"authors\":\"Favián González, Manuela Pardo-del-Val, Ana Redondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jamr-10-2023-0286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The purpose of the present study was to develop a measurement model to identify sources of resistance to change (RC) based on a previous systematic review.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The sample comprised 121 participants (faculty, students, graduates, and employees). Twenty-three items were assessed in four distinct stages: observation, exploration, confirmation, and communication. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis ensured the validity and reliability of the measurement process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The final 14-item model consisted of four groups: “Personalities averse to change”; “Limited participation in the change process”; “Dominant sociocultural predisposition”; and “Weak managerial commitment to change.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>It is hoped that the study will encourage further diagnostic examinations and assessments of the structural relationships associated with RC.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The present study expands our understanding of RC source typologies, the majority of which have focused on the individual and the organization. Higher education institutions bear a responsibility to initiate change to align with evolving environmental demands, but their endeavors are often subject to obstacles and delays stemming from individual and collective influences. To manage efficiently the conceptualization, planning, implementation, and management of change initiatives, we must comprehend and assess the primary sources of RC within such institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-10-2023-0286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-10-2023-0286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在先前系统回顾的基础上建立一个测量模型,以确定变革阻力(RC)的来源。设计/方法/途径样本包括 121 名参与者(教师、学生、毕业生和员工)。在观察、探索、确认和交流四个不同阶段对 23 个项目进行了评估。探索性和确认性因子分析确保了测量过程的有效性和可靠性:"希望本研究能鼓励对与 RC 相关的结构关系进行进一步的诊断检查和评估。原创性/价值本研究拓展了我们对 RC 来源类型的理解,大多数研究都侧重于个人和组织。高等教育机构有责任发起变革,以适应不断变化的环境需求,但他们的努力往往会受到来自个人和集体影响的障碍和延误。为了有效地管理变革举措的构思、规划、实施和管理,我们必须了解和评估这些机构内部的主要 RC 来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to develop a measurement model to identify sources of resistance to change (RC) based on a previous systematic review.

Design/methodology/approach

The sample comprised 121 participants (faculty, students, graduates, and employees). Twenty-three items were assessed in four distinct stages: observation, exploration, confirmation, and communication. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis ensured the validity and reliability of the measurement process.

Findings

The final 14-item model consisted of four groups: “Personalities averse to change”; “Limited participation in the change process”; “Dominant sociocultural predisposition”; and “Weak managerial commitment to change.”

Practical implications

It is hoped that the study will encourage further diagnostic examinations and assessments of the structural relationships associated with RC.

Originality/value

The present study expands our understanding of RC source typologies, the majority of which have focused on the individual and the organization. Higher education institutions bear a responsibility to initiate change to align with evolving environmental demands, but their endeavors are often subject to obstacles and delays stemming from individual and collective influences. To manage efficiently the conceptualization, planning, implementation, and management of change initiatives, we must comprehend and assess the primary sources of RC within such institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The type of supplier involvement in new product development in the automotive industry: metaheuristic-based K-means clustering and analytic hierarchical process methods Resilience of developing economies to external shocks: empirical evidence from CEMAC countries Unbraiding the effect of policy benefits on subjective well-being: the mediating role of work-related well-being Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions Assessment of bus fleet service quality: a graph theoretical approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1