考虑工作和家庭两方面的需求满足:员工工作与家庭的丰富性和幸福感取决于什么?

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/joop.12534
Heidi M. Baumann, Kelly Schwind Wilson
{"title":"考虑工作和家庭两方面的需求满足:员工工作与家庭的丰富性和幸福感取决于什么?","authors":"Heidi M. Baumann,&nbsp;Kelly Schwind Wilson","doi":"10.1111/joop.12534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study examines complexities in relationships between need satisfaction at work, need satisfaction at home, work-to-family enrichment (WFE) and well-being (in terms of positive affect). Competing theoretical perspectives are offered regarding relationships between need satisfaction and WFE. The first perspective, based in a domain specificity approach focused on the directional nature of WFE, suggests that need satisfaction at work is what matters for employees' WFE, irrespective of their need satisfaction at home. Alternatively, a second perspective proposes that both need satisfaction at work and need satisfaction at home represent important factors in employees' experiences of WFE and that congruence (i.e. similarity) between these two constructs is what matters for WFE. Competing hypotheses are tested in a sample of 204 full-time employees who completed both a work and home survey and were rated on well-being at home by a significant other. Results support the first perspective for competence need satisfaction and relatedness need satisfaction, while the second perspective is supported for autonomy need satisfaction. For all three needs, indirect relationships are found with well-being, both at work and at home, via WFE. Relevant theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 4","pages":"1659-1680"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considering need satisfaction both at work and at home: What matters for employees' work–family enrichment and well-being?\",\"authors\":\"Heidi M. Baumann,&nbsp;Kelly Schwind Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joop.12534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study examines complexities in relationships between need satisfaction at work, need satisfaction at home, work-to-family enrichment (WFE) and well-being (in terms of positive affect). Competing theoretical perspectives are offered regarding relationships between need satisfaction and WFE. The first perspective, based in a domain specificity approach focused on the directional nature of WFE, suggests that need satisfaction at work is what matters for employees' WFE, irrespective of their need satisfaction at home. Alternatively, a second perspective proposes that both need satisfaction at work and need satisfaction at home represent important factors in employees' experiences of WFE and that congruence (i.e. similarity) between these two constructs is what matters for WFE. Competing hypotheses are tested in a sample of 204 full-time employees who completed both a work and home survey and were rated on well-being at home by a significant other. Results support the first perspective for competence need satisfaction and relatedness need satisfaction, while the second perspective is supported for autonomy need satisfaction. For all three needs, indirect relationships are found with well-being, both at work and at home, via WFE. Relevant theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"97 4\",\"pages\":\"1659-1680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12534\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了工作需求满意度、家庭需求满意度、工作与家庭充实感(WFE)和幸福感(积极情感)之间关系的复杂性。关于需求满意度和工作家庭充实感之间的关系,提出了一些相互竞争的理论观点。第一种观点基于领域特异性方法,侧重于 WFE 的方向性,认为工作中的需求满足对员工的 WFE 至关重要,与他们在家庭中的需求满足无关。另一种观点认为,工作中的需求满意度和家庭中的需求满意度都是员工体验 WFE 的重要因素,而这两个建构之间的一致性(即相似性)对 WFE 至关重要。我们对 204 名全职员工进行了抽样调查,这些员工同时完成了工作和家庭调查,并由另一半对他们的家庭幸福程度进行了评分。结果表明,第一种观点适用于能力需求满足和亲情需求满足,第二种观点适用于自主需求满足。对于所有这三种需求而言,通过 WFE 发现了它们与工作和家庭幸福感之间的间接关系。本文讨论了相关的理论和实践意义,以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Considering need satisfaction both at work and at home: What matters for employees' work–family enrichment and well-being?

The current study examines complexities in relationships between need satisfaction at work, need satisfaction at home, work-to-family enrichment (WFE) and well-being (in terms of positive affect). Competing theoretical perspectives are offered regarding relationships between need satisfaction and WFE. The first perspective, based in a domain specificity approach focused on the directional nature of WFE, suggests that need satisfaction at work is what matters for employees' WFE, irrespective of their need satisfaction at home. Alternatively, a second perspective proposes that both need satisfaction at work and need satisfaction at home represent important factors in employees' experiences of WFE and that congruence (i.e. similarity) between these two constructs is what matters for WFE. Competing hypotheses are tested in a sample of 204 full-time employees who completed both a work and home survey and were rated on well-being at home by a significant other. Results support the first perspective for competence need satisfaction and relatedness need satisfaction, while the second perspective is supported for autonomy need satisfaction. For all three needs, indirect relationships are found with well-being, both at work and at home, via WFE. Relevant theoretical and practical implications are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1