在一项针对更年期妇女的随机试验中,研究人员发现了潮热和睡眠紊乱的影响。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.022
Mingzhuo Pei, Carolyn J Gibson, Michael Schembri, Harini Raghunathan, Deborah Grady, Peter Ganz, Alison J Huang
{"title":"在一项针对更年期妇女的随机试验中,研究人员发现了潮热和睡眠紊乱的影响。","authors":"Mingzhuo Pei, Carolyn J Gibson, Michael Schembri, Harini Raghunathan, Deborah Grady, Peter Ganz, Alison J Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hot flashes, common during menopause, affect up to 80% of the Western menopausal women and are reported to contribute to sleep disturbances in midlife. Few prospective data are available to confirm the specific role of hot flashes in disrupting sleep in midlife women, however, or confirm whether changes in hot flashes in response to clinical therapies result in improvement in sleep.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of continuous nitroglycerin therapy on sleep quality in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with frequent hot flashes (pre-specified secondary trial endpoint) and to examine prospective associations between hot flashes and sleep disruption in this population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Sleep data were analyzed from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) therapy to suppress nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Participants were randomized to uninterrupted use of transdermal NTG (0.2-0.6 mg/hour) or placebo for 12 weeks. Nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants from sleep were evaluated using 7-day symptom diaries at baseline, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks. Sleep disruption (wakefulness after sleep onset, WASO) was assessed using validated sleep diaries, and global sleep quality was assessed by the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI: range 0 [best] 21 [worst]) questionnaire. Mixed linear models examined changes in sleep quality and disruption, as well as the strength of associations between nocturnal hot flash frequency and sleep outcomes, over 5 and 12 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, age, race, and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 141 participants (70 to NTG and 71 to placebo, mean age 54.6 [±3.9] years), the mean baseline hot flash frequency was 10.8 (±3.5) per day, including 2.6 (±1.7) nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants. At baseline, hot flashes were the most commonly reported reason for nocturnal awakening, with 62.6% of participants reporting waking due to hot flashes at least twice nightly. Over 5 and 12 weeks, mean frequency of nocturnal hot flashes causing awakenings decreased in both groups (NTG: -0.9 episodes/night, placebo: -1.0 episodes/night). Sleep disruption as measured by average nightly WASO also decreased (NTG: -10.1 minutes, placebo: -7.3 minutes), and mean PSQI score improved (NTG: -1.3 points, placebo: -1.2 points). No significant between-group differences in change in sleep outcomes were detected from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks, including PSQI sleep quality score as a prespecified secondary trial endpoint (P≥.05 for all). Greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks was associated with greater improvement in PSQI sleep quality score (β= -0.30, P=.01) and sleep disruption reflected by WASO (β= -1.88, P=.02) in the combined sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among menopausal women in a randomized trial of continuous NTG therapy for hot flashes, hot flashes were the most frequently reported cause of nocturnal awakenings. Compared to placebo, continuous NTG therapy did not result in greater improvements in sleep quality from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks. Based on night-by-night symptom diaries and questionnaires, however, greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency in both groups was associated with greater improvement in sleep quality and disruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"102.e1-102.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hot flashes and sleep disruption in a randomized trial in menopausal women.\",\"authors\":\"Mingzhuo Pei, Carolyn J Gibson, Michael Schembri, Harini Raghunathan, Deborah Grady, Peter Ganz, Alison J Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hot flashes, common during menopause, affect up to 80% of the Western menopausal women and are reported to contribute to sleep disturbances in midlife. Few prospective data are available to confirm the specific role of hot flashes in disrupting sleep in midlife women, however, or confirm whether changes in hot flashes in response to clinical therapies result in improvement in sleep.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of continuous nitroglycerin therapy on sleep quality in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with frequent hot flashes (pre-specified secondary trial endpoint) and to examine prospective associations between hot flashes and sleep disruption in this population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Sleep data were analyzed from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) therapy to suppress nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Participants were randomized to uninterrupted use of transdermal NTG (0.2-0.6 mg/hour) or placebo for 12 weeks. Nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants from sleep were evaluated using 7-day symptom diaries at baseline, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks. Sleep disruption (wakefulness after sleep onset, WASO) was assessed using validated sleep diaries, and global sleep quality was assessed by the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI: range 0 [best] 21 [worst]) questionnaire. Mixed linear models examined changes in sleep quality and disruption, as well as the strength of associations between nocturnal hot flash frequency and sleep outcomes, over 5 and 12 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, age, race, and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 141 participants (70 to NTG and 71 to placebo, mean age 54.6 [±3.9] years), the mean baseline hot flash frequency was 10.8 (±3.5) per day, including 2.6 (±1.7) nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants. At baseline, hot flashes were the most commonly reported reason for nocturnal awakening, with 62.6% of participants reporting waking due to hot flashes at least twice nightly. Over 5 and 12 weeks, mean frequency of nocturnal hot flashes causing awakenings decreased in both groups (NTG: -0.9 episodes/night, placebo: -1.0 episodes/night). Sleep disruption as measured by average nightly WASO also decreased (NTG: -10.1 minutes, placebo: -7.3 minutes), and mean PSQI score improved (NTG: -1.3 points, placebo: -1.2 points). No significant between-group differences in change in sleep outcomes were detected from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks, including PSQI sleep quality score as a prespecified secondary trial endpoint (P≥.05 for all). Greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks was associated with greater improvement in PSQI sleep quality score (β= -0.30, P=.01) and sleep disruption reflected by WASO (β= -1.88, P=.02) in the combined sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among menopausal women in a randomized trial of continuous NTG therapy for hot flashes, hot flashes were the most frequently reported cause of nocturnal awakenings. Compared to placebo, continuous NTG therapy did not result in greater improvements in sleep quality from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks. Based on night-by-night symptom diaries and questionnaires, however, greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency in both groups was associated with greater improvement in sleep quality and disruption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102.e1-102.e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.07.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:潮热是更年期的常见症状,影响着多达 80% 的西方更年期妇女,据报道会导致中年女性睡眠障碍。然而,很少有前瞻性数据能证实潮热在干扰中年女性睡眠中的具体作用,也很少有数据能证实潮热对临床疗法的反应是否会导致睡眠改善:目的:研究持续硝酸甘油疗法对频繁潮热的围绝经期和绝经后妇女睡眠质量的影响(预先指定的次要试验终点),并研究该人群中潮热与睡眠干扰之间的前瞻性关联:研究数据来自一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,该试验采用连续透皮硝酸甘油(NTG)疗法抑制一氧化氮介导的围绝经期或绝经后潮热妇女血管扩张。参与者被随机分配到不间断使用透皮硝酸甘油(0.2-0.6 毫克/小时)或安慰剂,为期 12 周。在基线、5 周和 12 周时,使用 7 天症状日记对从睡眠中唤醒参与者的夜间潮热进行评估。使用有效的睡眠日记评估睡眠干扰(入睡后唤醒时间,WASO),使用有效的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI:范围 0 [最佳] 21 [最差])问卷评估总体睡眠质量。混合线性模型检测了5周和12周内睡眠质量和睡眠中断的变化,以及夜间潮热频率与睡眠结果之间的关联强度,并对基线值、年龄、种族和民族进行了调整:在141名参与者(70名服用NTG,71名服用安慰剂,平均年龄为54.6 [±3.9]岁)中,平均基线潮热频率为每天10.8 (±3.5)次,其中2.6 (±1.7)次夜间潮热唤醒了参与者。基线时,潮热是最常见的夜间觉醒原因,62.6%的参与者表示每晚至少有两次因潮热而觉醒。在 5 周和 12 周内,两组患者夜间潮热导致觉醒的平均频率均有所下降(NTG:-0.9 次/晚,安慰剂:-1.0 次/晚)。以每晚平均 WASO 衡量的睡眠干扰也有所减少(NTG:-10.1 分钟,安慰剂:-7.3 分钟),PSQI 平均得分有所提高(NTG:-1.3 分,安慰剂:-1.2 分)。从基线到5周和12周,包括作为预先指定的次要试验终点的PSQI睡眠质量评分,未发现组间睡眠结果变化有明显差异(P均≥0.05)。在综合样本中,5周和12周内夜间热潮红频率的较大改善与PSQI睡眠质量评分(β=-0.30,P=.01)和WASO反映的睡眠干扰(β=-1.88,P=.02)的较大改善相关:结论:在连续使用 NTG 治疗潮热的随机试验中,更年期妇女最常报告的夜间觉醒原因是潮热。与安慰剂相比,从基线到5周和12周,持续NTG疗法并未使睡眠质量得到更大改善。不过,根据逐夜症状日记和问卷调查,两组患者夜间潮热频率的改善程度都与睡眠质量和睡眠干扰的改善程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hot flashes and sleep disruption in a randomized trial in menopausal women.

Background: Hot flashes, common during menopause, affect up to 80% of the Western menopausal women and are reported to contribute to sleep disturbances in midlife. Few prospective data are available to confirm the specific role of hot flashes in disrupting sleep in midlife women, however, or confirm whether changes in hot flashes in response to clinical therapies result in improvement in sleep.

Objective: To examine the effects of continuous nitroglycerin therapy on sleep quality in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with frequent hot flashes (pre-specified secondary trial endpoint) and to examine prospective associations between hot flashes and sleep disruption in this population.

Study design: Sleep data were analyzed from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) therapy to suppress nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women with hot flashes. Participants were randomized to uninterrupted use of transdermal NTG (0.2-0.6 mg/hour) or placebo for 12 weeks. Nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants from sleep were evaluated using 7-day symptom diaries at baseline, 5 weeks, and 12 weeks. Sleep disruption (wakefulness after sleep onset, WASO) was assessed using validated sleep diaries, and global sleep quality was assessed by the validated Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI: range 0 [best] 21 [worst]) questionnaire. Mixed linear models examined changes in sleep quality and disruption, as well as the strength of associations between nocturnal hot flash frequency and sleep outcomes, over 5 and 12 weeks, adjusting for baseline values, age, race, and ethnicity.

Results: Among the 141 participants (70 to NTG and 71 to placebo, mean age 54.6 [±3.9] years), the mean baseline hot flash frequency was 10.8 (±3.5) per day, including 2.6 (±1.7) nocturnal hot flashes awakening participants. At baseline, hot flashes were the most commonly reported reason for nocturnal awakening, with 62.6% of participants reporting waking due to hot flashes at least twice nightly. Over 5 and 12 weeks, mean frequency of nocturnal hot flashes causing awakenings decreased in both groups (NTG: -0.9 episodes/night, placebo: -1.0 episodes/night). Sleep disruption as measured by average nightly WASO also decreased (NTG: -10.1 minutes, placebo: -7.3 minutes), and mean PSQI score improved (NTG: -1.3 points, placebo: -1.2 points). No significant between-group differences in change in sleep outcomes were detected from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks, including PSQI sleep quality score as a prespecified secondary trial endpoint (P≥.05 for all). Greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks was associated with greater improvement in PSQI sleep quality score (β= -0.30, P=.01) and sleep disruption reflected by WASO (β= -1.88, P=.02) in the combined sample.

Conclusion: Among menopausal women in a randomized trial of continuous NTG therapy for hot flashes, hot flashes were the most frequently reported cause of nocturnal awakenings. Compared to placebo, continuous NTG therapy did not result in greater improvements in sleep quality from baseline to 5 and 12 weeks. Based on night-by-night symptom diaries and questionnaires, however, greater improvement in nocturnal hot flash frequency in both groups was associated with greater improvement in sleep quality and disruption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus on offspring cardiovascular health in early adolescence. Agnostic identification of plasma biomarkers for postpartum hemorrhage risk. Preterm preeclampsia as an independent risk factor for thromboembolism in a large national cohort. Blood pressure cutoffs at 11-13 weeks of gestation and risk of preeclampsia. Expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features diagnosed at less than 24 weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1