Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Sungwon Chang, Vanessa Brunelli, Deidre Morgan, Thomas Similowski, Miriam Johnson, Magnus Ekström, David Currow
{"title":"残疾与长期呼吸困难:一项横断面人口研究。","authors":"Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Sungwon Chang, Vanessa Brunelli, Deidre Morgan, Thomas Similowski, Miriam Johnson, Magnus Ekström, David Currow","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disability, resulting from altered interactions between individuals and their environment, is a worldwide issue causing inequities and suffering. Many diseases associated with breathlessness cause disability but the relationship between disability and the severity of breathlessness itself is unknown.This study evaluated associations between disability using the WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and levels of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, cross-sectional online survey (n=10 033) reflected the most recent national census (2016) by age, sex, state/territory of residence and rurality. Assessments included self-reported disability (WHODAS 2.0 12-item (range 12 (no disability) to 60 (most severe disability)) assessed in 6 domains) and long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; 0-4 (4-most severe)). Days in the last month affected by breathlessness were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of respondents (52% women; mean age 45), mean total disability score was 20.9 (SD 9.5). 42% (n=4245) had mMRC >0 (mMRC1 31% (n=3139); mMRC2 8% (n=806); mMRC3,4 3% (n=300)). Every level of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> was associated with greater levels of disability (total p <0.001; each domain p <0.001). The most compromised domains were <i>Mobility</i> and <i>Participation</i>.In the last 30 days, people with severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4): experienced disability (20 days); reduced activities/work (10 days); and completely forwent activities (another 5 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability should be in the definition of persistent breathlessness as it is systematically associated with long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> in a grade-dependent, multidimensional manner. Disability should be assessed in people with long-term breathlessness to optimise their social well-being and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability and long-term breathlessness: a cross-sectional, population study.\",\"authors\":\"Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Sungwon Chang, Vanessa Brunelli, Deidre Morgan, Thomas Similowski, Miriam Johnson, Magnus Ekström, David Currow\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disability, resulting from altered interactions between individuals and their environment, is a worldwide issue causing inequities and suffering. Many diseases associated with breathlessness cause disability but the relationship between disability and the severity of breathlessness itself is unknown.This study evaluated associations between disability using the WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and levels of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, cross-sectional online survey (n=10 033) reflected the most recent national census (2016) by age, sex, state/territory of residence and rurality. Assessments included self-reported disability (WHODAS 2.0 12-item (range 12 (no disability) to 60 (most severe disability)) assessed in 6 domains) and long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; 0-4 (4-most severe)). Days in the last month affected by breathlessness were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of respondents (52% women; mean age 45), mean total disability score was 20.9 (SD 9.5). 42% (n=4245) had mMRC >0 (mMRC1 31% (n=3139); mMRC2 8% (n=806); mMRC3,4 3% (n=300)). Every level of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> was associated with greater levels of disability (total p <0.001; each domain p <0.001). The most compromised domains were <i>Mobility</i> and <i>Participation</i>.In the last 30 days, people with severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4): experienced disability (20 days); reduced activities/work (10 days); and completely forwent activities (another 5 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability should be in the definition of persistent breathlessness as it is systematically associated with long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> in a grade-dependent, multidimensional manner. Disability should be assessed in people with long-term breathlessness to optimise their social well-being and health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Respiratory Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disability and long-term breathlessness: a cross-sectional, population study.
Introduction: Disability, resulting from altered interactions between individuals and their environment, is a worldwide issue causing inequities and suffering. Many diseases associated with breathlessness cause disability but the relationship between disability and the severity of breathlessness itself is unknown.This study evaluated associations between disability using the WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and levels of long-term breathlessness limiting exertion.
Methods: This population-based, cross-sectional online survey (n=10 033) reflected the most recent national census (2016) by age, sex, state/territory of residence and rurality. Assessments included self-reported disability (WHODAS 2.0 12-item (range 12 (no disability) to 60 (most severe disability)) assessed in 6 domains) and long-term breathlessness limiting exertion (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; 0-4 (4-most severe)). Days in the last month affected by breathlessness were reported.
Results: Of respondents (52% women; mean age 45), mean total disability score was 20.9 (SD 9.5). 42% (n=4245) had mMRC >0 (mMRC1 31% (n=3139); mMRC2 8% (n=806); mMRC3,4 3% (n=300)). Every level of long-term breathlessness limiting exertion was associated with greater levels of disability (total p <0.001; each domain p <0.001). The most compromised domains were Mobility and Participation.In the last 30 days, people with severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4): experienced disability (20 days); reduced activities/work (10 days); and completely forwent activities (another 5 days).
Conclusions: Disability should be in the definition of persistent breathlessness as it is systematically associated with long-term breathlessness limiting exertion in a grade-dependent, multidimensional manner. Disability should be assessed in people with long-term breathlessness to optimise their social well-being and health.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.