通过纠正条形码处理偏差提高批量体质测定的准确性。

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular biology and evolution Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1093/molbev/msae152
Ryan Seamus McGee, Grant Kinsler, Dmitri Petrov, Mikhail Tikhonov
{"title":"通过纠正条形码处理偏差提高批量体质测定的准确性。","authors":"Ryan Seamus McGee, Grant Kinsler, Dmitri Petrov, Mikhail Tikhonov","doi":"10.1093/molbev/msae152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring the fitnesses of genetic variants is a fundamental objective in evolutionary biology. A standard approach for measuring microbial fitnesses in bulk involves labeling a library of genetic variants with unique sequence barcodes, competing the labeled strains in batch culture, and using deep sequencing to track changes in the barcode abundances over time. However, idiosyncratic properties of barcodes can induce nonuniform amplification or uneven sequencing coverage that causes some barcodes to be over- or under-represented in samples. This systematic bias can result in erroneous read count trajectories and misestimates of fitness. Here, we develop a computational method, named REBAR (Removing the Effects of Bias through Analysis of Residuals), for inferring the effects of barcode processing bias by leveraging the structure of systematic deviations in the data. We illustrate this approach by applying it to two independent data sets, and demonstrate that this method estimates and corrects for bias more accurately than standard proxies, such as GC-based corrections. REBAR mitigates bias and improves fitness estimates in high-throughput assays without introducing additional complexity to the experimental protocols, with potential applications in a range of experimental evolution and mutation screening contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18730,"journal":{"name":"Molecular biology and evolution","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Accuracy of Bulk Fitness Assays by Correcting Barcode Processing Biases.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Seamus McGee, Grant Kinsler, Dmitri Petrov, Mikhail Tikhonov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/molbev/msae152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring the fitnesses of genetic variants is a fundamental objective in evolutionary biology. A standard approach for measuring microbial fitnesses in bulk involves labeling a library of genetic variants with unique sequence barcodes, competing the labeled strains in batch culture, and using deep sequencing to track changes in the barcode abundances over time. However, idiosyncratic properties of barcodes can induce nonuniform amplification or uneven sequencing coverage that causes some barcodes to be over- or under-represented in samples. This systematic bias can result in erroneous read count trajectories and misestimates of fitness. Here, we develop a computational method, named REBAR (Removing the Effects of Bias through Analysis of Residuals), for inferring the effects of barcode processing bias by leveraging the structure of systematic deviations in the data. We illustrate this approach by applying it to two independent data sets, and demonstrate that this method estimates and corrects for bias more accurately than standard proxies, such as GC-based corrections. REBAR mitigates bias and improves fitness estimates in high-throughput assays without introducing additional complexity to the experimental protocols, with potential applications in a range of experimental evolution and mutation screening contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular biology and evolution\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316221/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular biology and evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae152\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular biology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量遗传变异的适应性是进化生物学的一个基本目标。批量测量微生物适存性的标准方法包括用独特的序列条形码标记基因变异体库,在批量培养中对标记菌株进行竞争,并使用深度测序跟踪条形码丰度随时间的变化。然而,条形码的特异性会导致扩增不均匀或测序覆盖率不均,从而导致某些条形码在样本中的代表性过高或过低。这种系统性偏差会导致错误的读数计数轨迹和错误的适配性估计。在此,我们开发了一种名为 REBAR 的计算方法,利用数据中系统偏差的结构来推断条形码处理偏差的影响。我们将这种方法应用于两个独立的数据集,并证明这种方法比基于 GC 的校正等标准替代方法更准确地估计和校正偏差。REBAR 可减轻高通量检测中的偏差并提高适配性估计,而不会给实验方案带来额外的复杂性,有望在一系列实验进化和突变筛选中得到应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Accuracy of Bulk Fitness Assays by Correcting Barcode Processing Biases.

Measuring the fitnesses of genetic variants is a fundamental objective in evolutionary biology. A standard approach for measuring microbial fitnesses in bulk involves labeling a library of genetic variants with unique sequence barcodes, competing the labeled strains in batch culture, and using deep sequencing to track changes in the barcode abundances over time. However, idiosyncratic properties of barcodes can induce nonuniform amplification or uneven sequencing coverage that causes some barcodes to be over- or under-represented in samples. This systematic bias can result in erroneous read count trajectories and misestimates of fitness. Here, we develop a computational method, named REBAR (Removing the Effects of Bias through Analysis of Residuals), for inferring the effects of barcode processing bias by leveraging the structure of systematic deviations in the data. We illustrate this approach by applying it to two independent data sets, and demonstrate that this method estimates and corrects for bias more accurately than standard proxies, such as GC-based corrections. REBAR mitigates bias and improves fitness estimates in high-throughput assays without introducing additional complexity to the experimental protocols, with potential applications in a range of experimental evolution and mutation screening contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular biology and evolution
Molecular biology and evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
19.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
257
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Biology and Evolution Journal Overview: Publishes research at the interface of molecular (including genomics) and evolutionary biology Considers manuscripts containing patterns, processes, and predictions at all levels of organization: population, taxonomic, functional, and phenotypic Interested in fundamental discoveries, new and improved methods, resources, technologies, and theories advancing evolutionary research Publishes balanced reviews of recent developments in genome evolution and forward-looking perspectives suggesting future directions in molecular evolution applications.
期刊最新文献
Remarkable evolutionary rate variations among lineages and among genome compartments in malaria parasites of mammals. Digital image processing to detect adaptive evolution. Accurate Inference of the Polyploid Continuum using Forward-time Simulations. Comparative genomics provides insights into adaptive evolution and demographics of bats. Convergent degenerated regulatory elements associated with limb loss in limbless amphibians and reptiles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1