持有私人医疗保险的病人的把关和转诊:对挪威全科医生的调查。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923
Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson
{"title":"持有私人医疗保险的病人的把关和转诊:对挪威全科医生的调查。","authors":"Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web based cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Norwegian general practice.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.\",\"authors\":\"Jørgen Breivold, Karin Isaksson Rø, Stein Nilsen, Merethe Kristine Kousgaard Andersen, Jørgen Nexøe, Stefán Hjörleifsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A web based cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Norwegian general practice.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2380923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在挪威,私人医疗保险越来越普遍。本研究旨在调查全科医生对私人医疗保险的看法,以及他们在医疗保险可能影响转诊决定的情况下的咨询经验:设计:基于网络的横断面调查:调查对象:挪威全科医生:主要结果指标:全科医生对私人医疗保险的看法和经验:全科医生对医疗保险的看法和经验以比例形式报告。采用多元逻辑回归法检验全科医生在不做进一步考虑的情况下转诊患者的频率与他们的特征、观点和经验等变量之间的关联:在 1,309 名全科医生中(回复率为 27%),93% 的人表示私人医疗保险会增加过度治疗的风险,90% 的人认为私人医疗保险会导致健康不平等。42%的全科医生表示,在没有医学指征的情况下,他们经常被迫转诊。此外,28%的全科医生经常或总是在没有进一步考虑的情况下选择转诊病人,这与压力感有关,调整后的几率比(AOR)为3.80,95%置信区间(CI)为2.73-5.29,还与病人拒绝后的不愉快反应有关(AOR为1.63,95%置信区间(CI)为1.14-2.33):尽管大多数参与调查的全科医生都认为私人医疗保险与过度治疗和健康不平等有关,但每四名全科医生中就有一名以上选择转诊而不做进一步考虑。全科医生面临转诊压力,而当他们认为转诊不符合医疗要求时,患者又会做出负面反应,这就增加了持有私人医疗保险的患者过度使用医疗服务的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.

Objective: Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring.

Design: A web based cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Norwegian general practice.

Subjects: All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey.

Main outcome measures: The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences.

Results: Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33).

Conclusion: Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1