基于4D-CT和4D-CBCT模拟的单中心多靶点肺立体定向体放射治疗中靶点间位置变化的定量评估。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s00432-024-05836-w
Siyu Zhang, Chang Guo, Jun Xu, Pudong Qian, Jiali Guo, Tingting Liu, Yifan Wu, Jun Hong, Qi Wang, Xia He, Li Sun
{"title":"基于4D-CT和4D-CBCT模拟的单中心多靶点肺立体定向体放射治疗中靶点间位置变化的定量评估。","authors":"Siyu Zhang, Chang Guo, Jun Xu, Pudong Qian, Jiali Guo, Tingting Liu, Yifan Wu, Jun Hong, Qi Wang, Xia He, Li Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00432-024-05836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), geometric miss risks arise from uncertainties in intertarget position. However, its assessment is inadequate, and may be interfered by the reconstructed tumor position errors (RPEs) during simulated CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) acquisition. This study aimed to quantify intertarget position variations and assess factors influencing it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 14 patients with 100 tumor pairs treated with single-isocenter SBRT. Intertarget position variation was measured using 4D-CT simulation to assess the intertarget position variations (ΔD) during routine treatment process. Additionally, a homologous 4D-CBCT simulation provided RPE-free comparison to determine the impact of RPEs, and isolating purely tumor motion induced ΔD to evaluate potential contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ΔD was 4.3 mm (4D-CT) and 3.4 mm (4D-CBCT). Variations exceeding 5 mm and 10 mm were observed in 31.1% and 5.5% (4D-CT) and 20.4% and 3.4% (4D-CBCT) of fractions, respectively. RPEs necessitated an additional 1-2 mm safety margin. Intertarget distance and breathing amplitude variability showed weak correlations with variation (R<sub>s</sub> = 0.33 and 0.31). The ΔD differed significantly by locations (upper vs. lower lobe and right vs. Left lung). Notably, left lung tumor pairs exhibited the highest risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provide a reliable way to assess intertarget position variation by using both 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT simulation. Consequently, single-isocenter SBRT for multiple lung tumors carries high risk of geometric miss. Tumor motion and RPE constitute a substantial portion of intertarget position variation, requiring correspondent strategies to minimize the intertarget uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11266286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative assessment of intertarget position variations based on 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT simulations in single-isocenter multitarget lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Siyu Zhang, Chang Guo, Jun Xu, Pudong Qian, Jiali Guo, Tingting Liu, Yifan Wu, Jun Hong, Qi Wang, Xia He, Li Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-024-05836-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), geometric miss risks arise from uncertainties in intertarget position. However, its assessment is inadequate, and may be interfered by the reconstructed tumor position errors (RPEs) during simulated CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) acquisition. This study aimed to quantify intertarget position variations and assess factors influencing it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 14 patients with 100 tumor pairs treated with single-isocenter SBRT. Intertarget position variation was measured using 4D-CT simulation to assess the intertarget position variations (ΔD) during routine treatment process. Additionally, a homologous 4D-CBCT simulation provided RPE-free comparison to determine the impact of RPEs, and isolating purely tumor motion induced ΔD to evaluate potential contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median ΔD was 4.3 mm (4D-CT) and 3.4 mm (4D-CBCT). Variations exceeding 5 mm and 10 mm were observed in 31.1% and 5.5% (4D-CT) and 20.4% and 3.4% (4D-CBCT) of fractions, respectively. RPEs necessitated an additional 1-2 mm safety margin. Intertarget distance and breathing amplitude variability showed weak correlations with variation (R<sub>s</sub> = 0.33 and 0.31). The ΔD differed significantly by locations (upper vs. lower lobe and right vs. Left lung). Notably, left lung tumor pairs exhibited the highest risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provide a reliable way to assess intertarget position variation by using both 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT simulation. Consequently, single-isocenter SBRT for multiple lung tumors carries high risk of geometric miss. Tumor motion and RPE constitute a substantial portion of intertarget position variation, requiring correspondent strategies to minimize the intertarget uncertainties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11266286/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05836-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05836-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在单中心多靶点立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)中,靶点间位置的不确定性会导致几何失误风险。然而,对其评估并不充分,可能会受到模拟 CT 和锥形束 CT(CBCT)采集过程中重建肿瘤位置误差(RPE)的干扰。本研究旨在量化目标间位置变化并评估其影响因素:我们分析了采用单中心 SBRT 治疗的 14 位患者的 100 对肿瘤数据。在常规治疗过程中,使用 4D-CT 模拟测量靶间位置变化,以评估靶间位置变化(ΔD)。此外,同源 4D-CBCT 模拟提供了无 RPE 的比较,以确定 RPE 的影响,并分离出纯粹由肿瘤运动引起的 ΔD 以评估潜在的诱因:中位 ΔD 为 4.3 毫米(4D-CT)和 3.4 毫米(4D-CBCT)。31.1%和5.5%(4D-CT)和20.4%和3.4%(4D-CBCT)的分段中分别观察到超过5毫米和10毫米的变化。RPE需要额外的1-2毫米安全裕度。目标间距离和呼吸振幅变异与变异呈弱相关性(Rs = 0.33 和 0.31)。不同部位(上叶与下叶、右肺与左肺)的ΔD差异很大。值得注意的是,左肺肿瘤对的风险最高:本研究通过使用 4D-CT 和 4D-CBCT 模拟为评估靶点间位置变化提供了一种可靠的方法。因此,单中心 SBRT 治疗多发肺部肿瘤具有较高的几何失误风险。肿瘤运动和RPE构成了目标间位置变化的主要部分,因此需要相应的策略来尽量减少目标间的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative assessment of intertarget position variations based on 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT simulations in single-isocenter multitarget lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Background: In single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), geometric miss risks arise from uncertainties in intertarget position. However, its assessment is inadequate, and may be interfered by the reconstructed tumor position errors (RPEs) during simulated CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) acquisition. This study aimed to quantify intertarget position variations and assess factors influencing it.

Methods: We analyzed data from 14 patients with 100 tumor pairs treated with single-isocenter SBRT. Intertarget position variation was measured using 4D-CT simulation to assess the intertarget position variations (ΔD) during routine treatment process. Additionally, a homologous 4D-CBCT simulation provided RPE-free comparison to determine the impact of RPEs, and isolating purely tumor motion induced ΔD to evaluate potential contributing factors.

Results: The median ΔD was 4.3 mm (4D-CT) and 3.4 mm (4D-CBCT). Variations exceeding 5 mm and 10 mm were observed in 31.1% and 5.5% (4D-CT) and 20.4% and 3.4% (4D-CBCT) of fractions, respectively. RPEs necessitated an additional 1-2 mm safety margin. Intertarget distance and breathing amplitude variability showed weak correlations with variation (Rs = 0.33 and 0.31). The ΔD differed significantly by locations (upper vs. lower lobe and right vs. Left lung). Notably, left lung tumor pairs exhibited the highest risk.

Conclusions: This study provide a reliable way to assess intertarget position variation by using both 4D-CT and 4D-CBCT simulation. Consequently, single-isocenter SBRT for multiple lung tumors carries high risk of geometric miss. Tumor motion and RPE constitute a substantial portion of intertarget position variation, requiring correspondent strategies to minimize the intertarget uncertainties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
RAC1 serves as a prognostic factor and correlated with immune infiltration in liver hepatocellular carcinoma Circadian rhythms and breast cancer: from molecular level to therapeutic advancements The risk of endocrine interventions in carriers of a genetic predisposition for breast and gynecologic cancers: recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Apalutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): real world data of a multicenter study. Integrative radiopathomics model for predicting progression-free survival in patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1