受欺凌者如何患上抑郁症?通过测试人际关系风格来解释受害与抑郁之间的联系。

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Research on Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/jora.13005
Minita Franzen, Marijtje A J van Duijn, Peter J de Jong, René Veenstra, Marije Aan Het Rot
{"title":"受欺凌者如何患上抑郁症?通过测试人际关系风格来解释受害与抑郁之间的联系。","authors":"Minita Franzen, Marijtje A J van Duijn, Peter J de Jong, René Veenstra, Marije Aan Het Rot","doi":"10.1111/jora.13005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tested to what extent the relation between bullying victimization and future symptoms of depression could be explained by victims being more hostile and less assertive than non-involved individuals. Data came from waves 2-4 of the Dutch TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). Participants' bullying experiences were assessed at age 13, interpersonal style at age 16, and depression symptoms at age 19. Mediation analyses were performed primarily on 274 self-reported victims and 1498 non-involved peers. Self-reported victims had an increased risk for depression symptoms. About a third of that risk could be explained by victims' hostile style, which was also higher than those of non-involved peers. Although victims also reported lower levels of assertiveness than non-involved peers, this interpersonal style did not mediate the link between bullying victimization and depression. Our findings suggest that high hostility, but not low assertiveness, partly explains the increased depression risk of self-reported victims. Therefore, interventions could focus on addressing hostility, to help reduce the likelihood that adolescents who have experienced bullying victimization will have more interpersonal conflicts and mental health problems in the future. Supplementary materials also include analyses for bullies and bully-victims, and for peer-reported measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do victims of bullying develop depression? Testing interpersonal style to explain the victimization-depression link.\",\"authors\":\"Minita Franzen, Marijtje A J van Duijn, Peter J de Jong, René Veenstra, Marije Aan Het Rot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jora.13005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study tested to what extent the relation between bullying victimization and future symptoms of depression could be explained by victims being more hostile and less assertive than non-involved individuals. Data came from waves 2-4 of the Dutch TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). Participants' bullying experiences were assessed at age 13, interpersonal style at age 16, and depression symptoms at age 19. Mediation analyses were performed primarily on 274 self-reported victims and 1498 non-involved peers. Self-reported victims had an increased risk for depression symptoms. About a third of that risk could be explained by victims' hostile style, which was also higher than those of non-involved peers. Although victims also reported lower levels of assertiveness than non-involved peers, this interpersonal style did not mediate the link between bullying victimization and depression. Our findings suggest that high hostility, but not low assertiveness, partly explains the increased depression risk of self-reported victims. Therefore, interventions could focus on addressing hostility, to help reduce the likelihood that adolescents who have experienced bullying victimization will have more interpersonal conflicts and mental health problems in the future. Supplementary materials also include analyses for bullies and bully-victims, and for peer-reported measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.13005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究测试了受欺凌与未来抑郁症状之间的关系在多大程度上可以用受害者比非受欺凌者更具敌意和更不自信来解释。数据来自荷兰青少年个人生活跟踪调查(TRAILS)的第 2-4 波。对参与者 13 岁时的欺凌经历、16 岁时的人际交往风格和 19 岁时的抑郁症状进行了评估。主要对 274 名自我报告的受害者和 1498 名未受欺凌的同伴进行了调解分析。自我报告的受害者出现抑郁症状的风险增加。其中约三分之一的风险可以用受害者的敌对风格来解释,而受害者的敌对风格也高于未卷入事件的同龄人。虽然受害者报告的自信程度也低于未受欺凌的同龄人,但这种人际交往方式并不能调节欺凌受害与抑郁之间的联系。我们的研究结果表明,高敌意(而非低自信)在一定程度上解释了自我报告的受害者抑郁风险增加的原因。因此,干预措施可以重点解决敌意问题,以帮助减少曾遭受欺凌的青少年在未来出现更多人际冲突和心理健康问题的可能性。补充材料还包括对欺凌者和欺凌受害者的分析,以及对同伴报告措施的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do victims of bullying develop depression? Testing interpersonal style to explain the victimization-depression link.

This study tested to what extent the relation between bullying victimization and future symptoms of depression could be explained by victims being more hostile and less assertive than non-involved individuals. Data came from waves 2-4 of the Dutch TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS). Participants' bullying experiences were assessed at age 13, interpersonal style at age 16, and depression symptoms at age 19. Mediation analyses were performed primarily on 274 self-reported victims and 1498 non-involved peers. Self-reported victims had an increased risk for depression symptoms. About a third of that risk could be explained by victims' hostile style, which was also higher than those of non-involved peers. Although victims also reported lower levels of assertiveness than non-involved peers, this interpersonal style did not mediate the link between bullying victimization and depression. Our findings suggest that high hostility, but not low assertiveness, partly explains the increased depression risk of self-reported victims. Therefore, interventions could focus on addressing hostility, to help reduce the likelihood that adolescents who have experienced bullying victimization will have more interpersonal conflicts and mental health problems in the future. Supplementary materials also include analyses for bullies and bully-victims, and for peer-reported measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary and international in scope, the Journal of Research on Adolescence (JRA) significantly advances knowledge in the field of adolescent research. Employing a diverse array of methodologies, this compelling journal publishes original research and integrative reviews of the highest level of scholarship. Featured studies include both quantitative and qualitative methodologies applied to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social development and behavior. Articles pertinent to the variety of developmental patterns inherent throughout adolescence are featured, including cross-national and cross-cultural studies. Attention is given to normative patterns of behavior as well as individual differences rooted in personal or social and cultural factors.
期刊最新文献
Daily association between parent-adolescent emotion contagion: The role of parent-adolescent connectednesss. Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis. Commentary: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on adolescent development: Embracing a more ecological perspective. Strategies to promote safety for sexual and gender minority youth in secondary schools: A longitudinal analysis. Challenging the dichotomy: Examining parent socialization goals and behaviors regarding positive affect in Bengaluru, India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1