内镜超声引导下咬合活检和内镜超声引导下细针穿刺在诊断恶性内镜活检阴性的胃肿瘤中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2381103
Liang Min, Yan Jin, Jiefei Chen, Hongyi Zhu, Chengbai Liang, Liang Lv, Yongjun Wang, Deliang Liu, Yuqian Zhou, Yi Chu, Yuyong Tan
{"title":"内镜超声引导下咬合活检和内镜超声引导下细针穿刺在诊断恶性内镜活检阴性的胃肿瘤中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Liang Min, Yan Jin, Jiefei Chen, Hongyi Zhu, Chengbai Liang, Liang Lv, Yongjun Wang, Deliang Liu, Yuqian Zhou, Yi Chu, Yuyong Tan","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2381103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific types of gastric tumors, including gastric linitis plastica and lymphoma, may cause extensive deep-layer infiltration, impeding an accurate diagnosis with endoscopic biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing gastric malignancies with negative endoscopic biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed suspicious malignant gastric lesion cases in our hospital from October 2017 to August 2023. Clinical manifestations, radiographical examinations, endoscopic examinations, histopathological results, and therapeutic strategies were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty malignant gastric tumor cases with negative endoscopic biopsies were incorporated into our study. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy was performed in 16 cases exclusively, whereas 17 patients received EUS-FNA exclusively, and seven patients underwent both simultaneously. Among the 23 patients who received the EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy, 22 (95.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies. Among the 24 patients who received EUS-FNA, a total of 19 cases with malignancies (79.2%) were confirmed by EUS-FNA (<i>p</i> = 0.11): 13 gastric adenocarcinomas, five metastatic malignancies, and one malignant stromal tumor. No adverse events were observed in any of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-FNA possess their advantages and disadvantages. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy could serve as a reliable diagnostic method for shallow lesions with negative malignant endoscopic biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of gastric tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Min, Yan Jin, Jiefei Chen, Hongyi Zhu, Chengbai Liang, Liang Lv, Yongjun Wang, Deliang Liu, Yuqian Zhou, Yi Chu, Yuyong Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2024.2381103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific types of gastric tumors, including gastric linitis plastica and lymphoma, may cause extensive deep-layer infiltration, impeding an accurate diagnosis with endoscopic biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing gastric malignancies with negative endoscopic biopsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed suspicious malignant gastric lesion cases in our hospital from October 2017 to August 2023. Clinical manifestations, radiographical examinations, endoscopic examinations, histopathological results, and therapeutic strategies were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty malignant gastric tumor cases with negative endoscopic biopsies were incorporated into our study. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy was performed in 16 cases exclusively, whereas 17 patients received EUS-FNA exclusively, and seven patients underwent both simultaneously. Among the 23 patients who received the EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy, 22 (95.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies. Among the 24 patients who received EUS-FNA, a total of 19 cases with malignancies (79.2%) were confirmed by EUS-FNA (<i>p</i> = 0.11): 13 gastric adenocarcinomas, five metastatic malignancies, and one malignant stromal tumor. No adverse events were observed in any of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-FNA possess their advantages and disadvantages. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy could serve as a reliable diagnostic method for shallow lesions with negative malignant endoscopic biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2381103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2381103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特定类型的胃肿瘤,包括胃粘膜炎和淋巴瘤,可能会引起广泛的深层浸润,从而妨碍内镜活检的准确诊断。本研究旨在评估内镜超声(EUS)引导下咬合活检和 EUS 引导下细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)在诊断内镜活检阴性的胃恶性肿瘤方面的疗效:回顾性分析我院2017年10月至2023年8月可疑胃恶性病变病例。记录并分析临床表现、影像学检查、内镜检查、组织病理学结果及治疗策略:40例内镜活检阴性的恶性胃肿瘤病例纳入研究。其中 16 例患者完全在 EUS 引导下进行了咬合活检,17 例患者完全接受了 EUS-FNA 检查,7 例患者同时接受了这两种检查。在接受 EUS 引导下咬合活检的 23 例患者中,22 例(95.7%)被确诊为恶性肿瘤。在接受 EUS-FNA 检查的 24 名患者中,共有 19 例(79.2%)通过 EUS-FNA 确诊为恶性肿瘤(P = 0.11):其中胃腺癌 13 例,转移性恶性肿瘤 5 例,恶性间质瘤 1 例。所有病例均未出现不良反应:结论:EUS引导下咬合活检和EUS-FNA各有利弊。结论:EUS引导下咬合活检和EUS-FNA各有利弊,对于恶性内镜活检阴性的浅表病变,EUS引导下咬合活检可作为一种可靠的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of gastric tumors with negative malignant endoscopy biopsies: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Specific types of gastric tumors, including gastric linitis plastica and lymphoma, may cause extensive deep-layer infiltration, impeding an accurate diagnosis with endoscopic biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing gastric malignancies with negative endoscopic biopsies.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed suspicious malignant gastric lesion cases in our hospital from October 2017 to August 2023. Clinical manifestations, radiographical examinations, endoscopic examinations, histopathological results, and therapeutic strategies were recorded and analyzed.

Results: Forty malignant gastric tumor cases with negative endoscopic biopsies were incorporated into our study. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy was performed in 16 cases exclusively, whereas 17 patients received EUS-FNA exclusively, and seven patients underwent both simultaneously. Among the 23 patients who received the EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy, 22 (95.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies. Among the 24 patients who received EUS-FNA, a total of 19 cases with malignancies (79.2%) were confirmed by EUS-FNA (p = 0.11): 13 gastric adenocarcinomas, five metastatic malignancies, and one malignant stromal tumor. No adverse events were observed in any of the cases.

Conclusions: EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-FNA possess their advantages and disadvantages. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy could serve as a reliable diagnostic method for shallow lesions with negative malignant endoscopic biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1