超越错误信念任务:儿童如何发展有关思维的知识

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant and Child Development Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1002/icd.2528
Marta Białecka, Arkadiusz Gut, Małgorzata Stępień-Nycz, Krystian Macheta, Jakub Janczura
{"title":"超越错误信念任务:儿童如何发展有关思维的知识","authors":"Marta Białecka,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Gut,&nbsp;Małgorzata Stępień-Nycz,&nbsp;Krystian Macheta,&nbsp;Jakub Janczura","doi":"10.1002/icd.2528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research on children's knowledge about the mind has primarily focused on their comprehension of false beliefs, leaving the conceptualization of thoughts and thinking less explored. To address this gap, we developed a new assessment tool, the interview about the mind (IaM), to assess children's understanding of the mind. Two studies involving Polish preschool and early school-aged children were conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the tool: a cross-sectional study with 212 preschoolers aged three to 6 years (106 boys, <i>M</i> = 59 months) followed by a longitudinal study with approximately 200 children (110 boys) assessed at ages 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 years. We found that the IaM possesses robust psychometric properties and a one-factor structure. Younger children recognize that thoughts are imperceptible to the senses and identified the mind's location as the head. Older children exhibited difficulties with analogical or abstract definitions of thoughts. As expected, a linear developmental trajectory was evident from ages 5.5–7.5, with children's language abilities showing a positive correlation with IaM scores. Future research should explore the relationship between knowledge about the mind and theory of mind (ToM), as well as cross-cultural differences in children's mind conceptualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the false belief task: How children develop their knowledge about the mind\",\"authors\":\"Marta Białecka,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Gut,&nbsp;Małgorzata Stępień-Nycz,&nbsp;Krystian Macheta,&nbsp;Jakub Janczura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/icd.2528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Previous research on children's knowledge about the mind has primarily focused on their comprehension of false beliefs, leaving the conceptualization of thoughts and thinking less explored. To address this gap, we developed a new assessment tool, the interview about the mind (IaM), to assess children's understanding of the mind. Two studies involving Polish preschool and early school-aged children were conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the tool: a cross-sectional study with 212 preschoolers aged three to 6 years (106 boys, <i>M</i> = 59 months) followed by a longitudinal study with approximately 200 children (110 boys) assessed at ages 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 years. We found that the IaM possesses robust psychometric properties and a one-factor structure. Younger children recognize that thoughts are imperceptible to the senses and identified the mind's location as the head. Older children exhibited difficulties with analogical or abstract definitions of thoughts. As expected, a linear developmental trajectory was evident from ages 5.5–7.5, with children's language abilities showing a positive correlation with IaM scores. Future research should explore the relationship between knowledge about the mind and theory of mind (ToM), as well as cross-cultural differences in children's mind conceptualization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant and Child Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.2528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往对儿童心灵知识的研究主要集中在他们对错误信念的理解上,对思想和思维的概念化研究较少。为了弥补这一不足,我们开发了一种新的评估工具--心灵访谈(IaM),以评估儿童对心灵的理解。为了评估该工具的有效性和可靠性,我们对波兰学龄前儿童和学龄初期儿童进行了两项研究:一项是横断面研究,对象是 212 名 3 至 6 岁的学龄前儿童(106 名男孩,M = 59 个月);另一项是纵向研究,对象是约 200 名儿童(110 名男孩),分别在 5.5 岁、6.5 岁和 7.5 岁时进行评估。我们发现,IaM 具有稳健的心理测量特性和单因素结构。年龄较小的儿童认识到思想是感官无法感知的,并确定思想的位置是头部。年龄较大的儿童在对思想进行类比或抽象定义时表现出困难。正如预期的那样,5.5-7.5 岁儿童的发展轨迹呈线性发展,儿童的语言能力与 IaM 分数呈正相关。未来的研究应探讨有关思维的知识与思维理论(ToM)之间的关系,以及儿童思维概念化的跨文化差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beyond the false belief task: How children develop their knowledge about the mind

Previous research on children's knowledge about the mind has primarily focused on their comprehension of false beliefs, leaving the conceptualization of thoughts and thinking less explored. To address this gap, we developed a new assessment tool, the interview about the mind (IaM), to assess children's understanding of the mind. Two studies involving Polish preschool and early school-aged children were conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the tool: a cross-sectional study with 212 preschoolers aged three to 6 years (106 boys, M = 59 months) followed by a longitudinal study with approximately 200 children (110 boys) assessed at ages 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5 years. We found that the IaM possesses robust psychometric properties and a one-factor structure. Younger children recognize that thoughts are imperceptible to the senses and identified the mind's location as the head. Older children exhibited difficulties with analogical or abstract definitions of thoughts. As expected, a linear developmental trajectory was evident from ages 5.5–7.5, with children's language abilities showing a positive correlation with IaM scores. Future research should explore the relationship between knowledge about the mind and theory of mind (ToM), as well as cross-cultural differences in children's mind conceptualization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)
期刊最新文献
Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development for Turkish Children: Cultural Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Analysis Qualities That Mexican, Dominican and African American US Mothers Attribute to ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Mothers and Fathers Infants adapt their pointing frequency to experimentally manipulated parent responsiveness but not parent pointing Parasympathetic regulation and maternal parenting as longitudinal predictors of preschooler inhibitory control Toddlers' emotion vocalizations during peer conflicts and contingent teacher interventions in early care and education settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1