{"title":"Pageant 作者:Joan FitzPatrick Dean(评论)","authors":"David J. Eshelman","doi":"10.1353/tj.2024.a932182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Pageant</em> By Joan FitzPatrick Dean <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David J. Eshelman </li> </ul> <em>PAGEANT</em>. By Joan FitzPatrick Dean. Forms of Drama Series. London: Methuen, 2021; pp. 177. <p>Pageants are large-scale scripted events designed to appeal to, include, and build communities. Joan FitzPatrick Dean’s book serves as an introduction to the pageant form, with three detailed analyses of pageants in history. This historical study focuses on British and US examples. Dean’s exploration spans centuries, with key examples including the Noah pageants of the Middle Ages, <em>A Pageant of Great Women</em> and other suffrage pageants of the early 1900s, and the <em>Isles of Wonder</em> that opened the 2012 Olympic Games in London. In each case, she provides abundant description and situates performances within the larger context of pageant history and theory, studying language, structure, and production elements. This book is important because it brings attention to a theatrical form that <strong>[End Page 250]</strong> has been largely ignored by critics since the early twentieth century. <em>Pageant</em> is a welcome addition to the sparse number of recent studies such as David Glassberg’s <em>American Historical Pageantry</em> (1990) and Dean’s own <em>All Dressed Up: Modern Irish Historical Pageantry</em> (2014). Dean’s published work makes her the expert in the field. <em>Pageant</em> differs from her previous publication in that it discusses the form more broadly, but this broadness goes perhaps too far. While she makes apt use of the categories of “hegemonic” and “counterhegemonic,” I would have preferred a stronger argumentative thrust. However, I am intensely grateful for her work.</p> <p>Among <em>Pageant</em>’s strengths is the introduction, which details the form. Dean lays out features that separate the pageant from traditional stage plays: qualities such as “short shelf life” and the tendency to be “performed outside purpose-built theaters” (2); “straightforward” plotting, presentational style, and its emphasis on amateur performance (4); and a dependence on singing (7). These traits are tantalizing and point to innovative ways of doing performance. Dean’s representative performances cover key historical points typically cited in pageant studies—the medieval period and the turn of the twentieth century—along with the more recent Olympics example. Medieval pageants, or Corpus Christi plays, were religious dramas commonly performed at festivals by working-class laymen. The turn of the twentieth century is significant because it marked a spike in popularity of the pageant. Dean begins her analysis of this period with a discussion of British dramatist Louis Napoleon Parker and US playwright Percy MacKaye. Both were established “pageant-masters,” meaning that they toured their respective countries helping communities put shows together. Both emphasized and glorified the past, commemorating events that political leaders found important to the myths of the founding and development of their respective nations. In this way, Parker and MacKaye created hegemonic performances that bolstered current political leadership. Dean quotes MacKaye, who advocated pageants to build national identity “to create an appropriate national ritual of American Citizenship” (24).</p> <p>The hegemonic/counterhegemonic thread appears at intervals throughout the book. For example, in her discussion of medieval Noah plays, Dean foregrounds the figure of Noah’s wife, written as a comic character. She points both to the counterhegemonic uses of this figure—as a clown in an otherwise serious religious story—and to more recent understandings of her as a hegemonic reinforcement of prevailing gender stereotypes (57). Dean later highlights counterhegemony in her discussion of the women’s suffrage pageants of the early twentieth century aimed at societal change—specifically gaining women the right to vote. A key contributor to this movement was British activist Cicely Mary Hamilton (1872-1952), who championed the “New Woman” (77). In contrast to Parker’s and MacKaye’s pageants, which reinforce cultural norms through a rosy look at history, the suffrage performances used pageant conventions to empower women. Specifically, they used <em>tableaux vivants</em>, including scenes of famous women from history, with community members cast as actors (93).</p> <p>In the last chapter of <em>Pageant</em>, Dean extends her look at pageantry into the current century by examining the “mega-events” of the Olympic Games opening ceremonies. After an overview of the ceremonies of the 1936 Berlin Games, the 1984 Los Angeles Games, and others, Dean focuses on <em>The Isles of...</em></p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pageant By Joan FitzPatrick Dean (review)\",\"authors\":\"David J. Eshelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tj.2024.a932182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Pageant</em> By Joan FitzPatrick Dean <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David J. Eshelman </li> </ul> <em>PAGEANT</em>. By Joan FitzPatrick Dean. Forms of Drama Series. London: Methuen, 2021; pp. 177. <p>Pageants are large-scale scripted events designed to appeal to, include, and build communities. Joan FitzPatrick Dean’s book serves as an introduction to the pageant form, with three detailed analyses of pageants in history. This historical study focuses on British and US examples. Dean’s exploration spans centuries, with key examples including the Noah pageants of the Middle Ages, <em>A Pageant of Great Women</em> and other suffrage pageants of the early 1900s, and the <em>Isles of Wonder</em> that opened the 2012 Olympic Games in London. In each case, she provides abundant description and situates performances within the larger context of pageant history and theory, studying language, structure, and production elements. This book is important because it brings attention to a theatrical form that <strong>[End Page 250]</strong> has been largely ignored by critics since the early twentieth century. <em>Pageant</em> is a welcome addition to the sparse number of recent studies such as David Glassberg’s <em>American Historical Pageantry</em> (1990) and Dean’s own <em>All Dressed Up: Modern Irish Historical Pageantry</em> (2014). Dean’s published work makes her the expert in the field. <em>Pageant</em> differs from her previous publication in that it discusses the form more broadly, but this broadness goes perhaps too far. While she makes apt use of the categories of “hegemonic” and “counterhegemonic,” I would have preferred a stronger argumentative thrust. However, I am intensely grateful for her work.</p> <p>Among <em>Pageant</em>’s strengths is the introduction, which details the form. Dean lays out features that separate the pageant from traditional stage plays: qualities such as “short shelf life” and the tendency to be “performed outside purpose-built theaters” (2); “straightforward” plotting, presentational style, and its emphasis on amateur performance (4); and a dependence on singing (7). These traits are tantalizing and point to innovative ways of doing performance. Dean’s representative performances cover key historical points typically cited in pageant studies—the medieval period and the turn of the twentieth century—along with the more recent Olympics example. Medieval pageants, or Corpus Christi plays, were religious dramas commonly performed at festivals by working-class laymen. The turn of the twentieth century is significant because it marked a spike in popularity of the pageant. Dean begins her analysis of this period with a discussion of British dramatist Louis Napoleon Parker and US playwright Percy MacKaye. Both were established “pageant-masters,” meaning that they toured their respective countries helping communities put shows together. Both emphasized and glorified the past, commemorating events that political leaders found important to the myths of the founding and development of their respective nations. In this way, Parker and MacKaye created hegemonic performances that bolstered current political leadership. Dean quotes MacKaye, who advocated pageants to build national identity “to create an appropriate national ritual of American Citizenship” (24).</p> <p>The hegemonic/counterhegemonic thread appears at intervals throughout the book. For example, in her discussion of medieval Noah plays, Dean foregrounds the figure of Noah’s wife, written as a comic character. She points both to the counterhegemonic uses of this figure—as a clown in an otherwise serious religious story—and to more recent understandings of her as a hegemonic reinforcement of prevailing gender stereotypes (57). Dean later highlights counterhegemony in her discussion of the women’s suffrage pageants of the early twentieth century aimed at societal change—specifically gaining women the right to vote. A key contributor to this movement was British activist Cicely Mary Hamilton (1872-1952), who championed the “New Woman” (77). In contrast to Parker’s and MacKaye’s pageants, which reinforce cultural norms through a rosy look at history, the suffrage performances used pageant conventions to empower women. Specifically, they used <em>tableaux vivants</em>, including scenes of famous women from history, with community members cast as actors (93).</p> <p>In the last chapter of <em>Pageant</em>, Dean extends her look at pageantry into the current century by examining the “mega-events” of the Olympic Games opening ceremonies. After an overview of the ceremonies of the 1936 Berlin Games, the 1984 Los Angeles Games, and others, Dean focuses on <em>The Isles of...</em></p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a932182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a932182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:审稿人 Pageant By Joan FitzPatrick Dean David J. Eshelman PAGEANT.作者:琼-菲茨帕特里克-迪恩。戏剧形式系列。伦敦:Methuen,2021 年;第 177 页。选美是大型的剧本活动,旨在吸引、包容和建设社区。琼-菲茨帕特里克-迪恩(Joan FitzPatrick Dean)在书中介绍了选美形式,并对历史上的选美活动进行了三次详细分析。这项历史研究侧重于英国和美国的实例。迪恩的探索跨越了几个世纪,主要例子包括中世纪的诺亚选美会、20 世纪初的 "伟大女性的盛会 "和其他选举权选美会,以及 2012 年伦敦奥运会开幕式上的 "奇迹之岛"。在每个案例中,她都提供了大量的描述,并将表演置于选美历史和理论的大背景中,研究语言、结构和制作元素。本书的重要性在于,它让人们注意到了一种自二十世纪初以来在很大程度上被评论家忽视的戏剧形式。除了大卫-格拉斯伯格(David Glassberg)的《美国历史选美》(1990 年)和迪恩自己的《盛装打扮:现代爱尔兰历史选美》(2014 年)等数量稀少的近期研究之外,《选美》是一本值得欢迎的新书。迪恩已出版的著作使她成为该领域的专家。Pageant 与她之前的出版物不同之处在于,该书对这种形式进行了更广泛的讨论,但这种广泛性或许走得太远了。虽然她恰如其分地使用了 "霸权 "和 "反霸权 "的范畴,但我更希望她的论证主旨更加有力。不过,我还是非常感谢她的工作。盛会》的优点之一是导言,其中详细介绍了该书的形式。迪安列出了选美与传统舞台剧的不同之处:如 "保存期短 "和倾向于 "在专门建造的剧场外演出"(2);"直截了当 "的情节安排、展示风格和对业余表演的强调(4);以及对歌唱的依赖(7)。这些特点都很诱人,指向创新的表演方式。迪安的代表性表演涵盖了选美研究中通常引用的关键历史时期--中世纪和二十世纪之交--以及最近的奥运会。中世纪的庆典或基督圣体剧,是工人阶级非专业人士在节日期间经常表演的宗教剧。二十世纪之交的意义重大,因为它标志着盛会的流行高峰。迪恩在分析这一时期时首先讨论了英国戏剧家路易斯-拿破仑-帕克和美国剧作家珀西-麦凯。两人都是久负盛名的 "选美大师",这意味着他们在各自的国家巡回演出,帮助社区组织演出。两人都强调和美化过去,纪念政治领导人认为对各自国家的建国和发展神话具有重要意义的事件。通过这种方式,帕克和麦凯耶创造了霸权表演,为当前的政治领导提供了支持。迪恩引用了麦凯的观点,他主张通过选美来建立国家认同,"创造一种适当的美国公民国家仪式"(24)。霸权/反霸权的线索在全书中不时出现。例如,在讨论中世纪的诺亚戏剧时,迪恩强调了诺亚妻子的形象,她被写成了一个喜剧人物。她既指出了这一形象的反霸权用途--在一个严肃的宗教故事中扮演一个小丑,也指出了近来对她的理解--她是对普遍性别刻板印象的霸权强化(57)。Dean 后来在讨论 20 世纪初旨在改变社会--特别是为妇女争取选举权--的妇女选举权选美时强调了反霸权。英国活动家西塞莉-玛丽-汉密尔顿(Cicely Mary Hamilton,1872-1952 年)是这一运动的主要贡献者,她倡导 "新女性"(77)。帕克和麦克凯伊的庆典通过对历史的美好描绘来强化文化规范,与此形成鲜明对比的是,参政权选举表演利用庆典惯例来赋予妇女权力。具体而言,他们使用了生动的场景,包括历史上著名女性的场景,由社区成员担任演员(93)。在《盛会》的最后一章,迪恩通过研究奥运会开幕式这一 "大型活动",将她对盛会的研究延伸到了本世纪。在概述了 1936 年柏林奥运会、1984 年洛杉矶奥运会以及其他奥运会的开幕式之后,迪恩将重点放在了 "奥林匹克之岛"(The Isles of...
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
Reviewed by:
Pageant By Joan FitzPatrick Dean
David J. Eshelman
PAGEANT. By Joan FitzPatrick Dean. Forms of Drama Series. London: Methuen, 2021; pp. 177.
Pageants are large-scale scripted events designed to appeal to, include, and build communities. Joan FitzPatrick Dean’s book serves as an introduction to the pageant form, with three detailed analyses of pageants in history. This historical study focuses on British and US examples. Dean’s exploration spans centuries, with key examples including the Noah pageants of the Middle Ages, A Pageant of Great Women and other suffrage pageants of the early 1900s, and the Isles of Wonder that opened the 2012 Olympic Games in London. In each case, she provides abundant description and situates performances within the larger context of pageant history and theory, studying language, structure, and production elements. This book is important because it brings attention to a theatrical form that [End Page 250] has been largely ignored by critics since the early twentieth century. Pageant is a welcome addition to the sparse number of recent studies such as David Glassberg’s American Historical Pageantry (1990) and Dean’s own All Dressed Up: Modern Irish Historical Pageantry (2014). Dean’s published work makes her the expert in the field. Pageant differs from her previous publication in that it discusses the form more broadly, but this broadness goes perhaps too far. While she makes apt use of the categories of “hegemonic” and “counterhegemonic,” I would have preferred a stronger argumentative thrust. However, I am intensely grateful for her work.
Among Pageant’s strengths is the introduction, which details the form. Dean lays out features that separate the pageant from traditional stage plays: qualities such as “short shelf life” and the tendency to be “performed outside purpose-built theaters” (2); “straightforward” plotting, presentational style, and its emphasis on amateur performance (4); and a dependence on singing (7). These traits are tantalizing and point to innovative ways of doing performance. Dean’s representative performances cover key historical points typically cited in pageant studies—the medieval period and the turn of the twentieth century—along with the more recent Olympics example. Medieval pageants, or Corpus Christi plays, were religious dramas commonly performed at festivals by working-class laymen. The turn of the twentieth century is significant because it marked a spike in popularity of the pageant. Dean begins her analysis of this period with a discussion of British dramatist Louis Napoleon Parker and US playwright Percy MacKaye. Both were established “pageant-masters,” meaning that they toured their respective countries helping communities put shows together. Both emphasized and glorified the past, commemorating events that political leaders found important to the myths of the founding and development of their respective nations. In this way, Parker and MacKaye created hegemonic performances that bolstered current political leadership. Dean quotes MacKaye, who advocated pageants to build national identity “to create an appropriate national ritual of American Citizenship” (24).
The hegemonic/counterhegemonic thread appears at intervals throughout the book. For example, in her discussion of medieval Noah plays, Dean foregrounds the figure of Noah’s wife, written as a comic character. She points both to the counterhegemonic uses of this figure—as a clown in an otherwise serious religious story—and to more recent understandings of her as a hegemonic reinforcement of prevailing gender stereotypes (57). Dean later highlights counterhegemony in her discussion of the women’s suffrage pageants of the early twentieth century aimed at societal change—specifically gaining women the right to vote. A key contributor to this movement was British activist Cicely Mary Hamilton (1872-1952), who championed the “New Woman” (77). In contrast to Parker’s and MacKaye’s pageants, which reinforce cultural norms through a rosy look at history, the suffrage performances used pageant conventions to empower women. Specifically, they used tableaux vivants, including scenes of famous women from history, with community members cast as actors (93).
In the last chapter of Pageant, Dean extends her look at pageantry into the current century by examining the “mega-events” of the Olympic Games opening ceremonies. After an overview of the ceremonies of the 1936 Berlin Games, the 1984 Los Angeles Games, and others, Dean focuses on The Isles of...
期刊介绍:
For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.