大麻二酚会增加Δ9-四氢大麻酚的精神作用和血浆浓度,但不会改善其镇痛特性。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3381
Andriy A. Gorbenko, Jules A.A.C. Heuberger, Linda E. Klumpers, Marieke L. de Kam, Pamela K. Strugala, Saco J. de Visser, Geert J. Groeneveld
{"title":"大麻二酚会增加Δ9-四氢大麻酚的精神作用和血浆浓度,但不会改善其镇痛特性。","authors":"Andriy A. Gorbenko,&nbsp;Jules A.A.C. Heuberger,&nbsp;Linda E. Klumpers,&nbsp;Marieke L. de Kam,&nbsp;Pamela K. Strugala,&nbsp;Saco J. de Visser,&nbsp;Geert J. Groeneveld","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cannabidiol (CBD), the main non-intoxicating compound in cannabis, has been hypothesized to reduce the adverse effects of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive and analgesic component of cannabis. This clinical trial investigated the hypothesis that CBD counteracts the adverse effects of THC and thereby potentially improves the tolerability of cannabis as an analgesic. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-way cross-over trial was performed in 37 healthy volunteers. On each visit, a double-placebo, THC 9 mg with placebo CBD, or THC 9 mg with 10, 30, or 450 mg CBD was administered orally. Psychoactive and analgesic effects were quantified using standardized test batteries. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects model. Co-administration of 450 mg CBD did not reduce, but instead significantly increased subjective, psychomotor, cognitive, and autonomous effects of THC (e.g., VAS “Feeling High” by 60.5% (95% CI: 12.7%, 128.5%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01)), whereas THC effects with 10 and 30 mg CBD were not significantly different from THC alone. CBD did not significantly enhance THC analgesia at any dose level. Administration of 450 mg CBD significantly increased AUC<sub>last</sub> of THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.54, 3.08, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) and 11-OH-THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 6.24, 95% CI: 4.27, 9.12, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) compared with THC alone, and 30 mg CBD significantly increased AUC<sub>last</sub> of 11-OH-THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.77, <i>P</i> = 0.0013), and of THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.04, <i>P</i> = 0.0446). Present findings do not support the use of CBD to reduce adverse effects of oral THC or enhance THC analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.3381","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabidiol Increases Psychotropic Effects and Plasma Concentrations of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Without Improving Its Analgesic Properties\",\"authors\":\"Andriy A. Gorbenko,&nbsp;Jules A.A.C. Heuberger,&nbsp;Linda E. Klumpers,&nbsp;Marieke L. de Kam,&nbsp;Pamela K. Strugala,&nbsp;Saco J. de Visser,&nbsp;Geert J. Groeneveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cannabidiol (CBD), the main non-intoxicating compound in cannabis, has been hypothesized to reduce the adverse effects of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive and analgesic component of cannabis. This clinical trial investigated the hypothesis that CBD counteracts the adverse effects of THC and thereby potentially improves the tolerability of cannabis as an analgesic. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-way cross-over trial was performed in 37 healthy volunteers. On each visit, a double-placebo, THC 9 mg with placebo CBD, or THC 9 mg with 10, 30, or 450 mg CBD was administered orally. Psychoactive and analgesic effects were quantified using standardized test batteries. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects model. Co-administration of 450 mg CBD did not reduce, but instead significantly increased subjective, psychomotor, cognitive, and autonomous effects of THC (e.g., VAS “Feeling High” by 60.5% (95% CI: 12.7%, 128.5%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01)), whereas THC effects with 10 and 30 mg CBD were not significantly different from THC alone. CBD did not significantly enhance THC analgesia at any dose level. Administration of 450 mg CBD significantly increased AUC<sub>last</sub> of THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.54, 3.08, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) and 11-OH-THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 6.24, 95% CI: 4.27, 9.12, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001) compared with THC alone, and 30 mg CBD significantly increased AUC<sub>last</sub> of 11-OH-THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.77, <i>P</i> = 0.0013), and of THC (AUC<sub>last</sub> ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.04, <i>P</i> = 0.0446). Present findings do not support the use of CBD to reduce adverse effects of oral THC or enhance THC analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.3381\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3381\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大麻二酚(CBD)是大麻中主要的无毒化合物,据推测它可以减轻大麻中主要的精神活性和镇痛成分Δ9-四氢大麻酚(THC)的不良反应。这项临床试验研究的假设是,CBD 可以抵消 THC 的不良反应,从而改善大麻作为镇痛剂的耐受性。37 名健康志愿者参加了这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、五向交叉试验。每次口服双安慰剂、9 毫克四氢大麻酚和安慰剂 CBD,或 9 毫克四氢大麻酚和 10、30 或 450 毫克 CBD。使用标准化测试套件对精神作用和镇痛效果进行量化。进行药代动力学取样。数据采用混合效应模型进行分析。同时服用 450 毫克 CBD 不仅不会降低 THC 的主观、精神运动、认知和自主效应,反而会显著增加这些效应(例如,VAS "感觉兴奋 "增加了 1.5 倍)、VAS "感觉兴奋 "增加 60.5%(95% CI:12.7%,128.5%,THC 的最后 P 值(AUClast 比值:2.18,95% CI:1.54,3.08,P 最后比值:6.24,95% CI:4.27,9.12, P last of 11-OH-THC (AUClast ratio: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.77, P = 0.0013), and of THC (AUClast ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.04, P = 0.0446)。目前的研究结果不支持使用 CBD 减少口服 THC 的不良反应或增强 THC 的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cannabidiol Increases Psychotropic Effects and Plasma Concentrations of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Without Improving Its Analgesic Properties

Cannabidiol (CBD), the main non-intoxicating compound in cannabis, has been hypothesized to reduce the adverse effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive and analgesic component of cannabis. This clinical trial investigated the hypothesis that CBD counteracts the adverse effects of THC and thereby potentially improves the tolerability of cannabis as an analgesic. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, five-way cross-over trial was performed in 37 healthy volunteers. On each visit, a double-placebo, THC 9 mg with placebo CBD, or THC 9 mg with 10, 30, or 450 mg CBD was administered orally. Psychoactive and analgesic effects were quantified using standardized test batteries. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects model. Co-administration of 450 mg CBD did not reduce, but instead significantly increased subjective, psychomotor, cognitive, and autonomous effects of THC (e.g., VAS “Feeling High” by 60.5% (95% CI: 12.7%, 128.5%, P < 0.01)), whereas THC effects with 10 and 30 mg CBD were not significantly different from THC alone. CBD did not significantly enhance THC analgesia at any dose level. Administration of 450 mg CBD significantly increased AUClast of THC (AUClast ratio: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.54, 3.08, P < 0.0001) and 11-OH-THC (AUClast ratio: 6.24, 95% CI: 4.27, 9.12, P < 0.0001) compared with THC alone, and 30 mg CBD significantly increased AUClast of 11-OH-THC (AUClast ratio: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.77, P = 0.0013), and of THC (AUClast ratio: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.04, P = 0.0446). Present findings do not support the use of CBD to reduce adverse effects of oral THC or enhance THC analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan. Effects of GLPG3970 on Sulfasalazine and Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Adults: Two Open-Label, Phase I, Drug-Drug Interaction Studies. Effects of Cimetidine and Dolutegravir on the Endogenous Drug-Drug Interaction Biomarkers for Organic Cation Transporter 2 and Multidrug and Toxin Extrusion Protein 1 in Healthy Volunteers. Correction to Beyond MABEL: An Integrative Approach to First in Human Dose Selection of Immunomodulators by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Immuno-Safety Technical Committee (ITC). Real-World Effectiveness of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus-Related HCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1