雅培 BinaxNOW COVID-19 抗原卡测试的诊断准确性,波多黎各。

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1111/irv.13305
Zachary J. Madewell, Chelsea G. Major, Nathan Graff, Cameron Adams, Dania M. Rodriguez, Tatiana Morales, Nicole A. Medina Lopes, Rafael Tosado, Liliana Sánchez-González, Janice Perez-Padilla, Hannah R. Volkman, Jorge Bertrán-Pasarell, Diego Sainz de la Peña, Jorge Munoz-Jordan, Gilberto A. Santiago, Olga Lorenzi, Vanessa Rivera-Amill, Melissa A. Rolfes, Gabriela Paz-Bailey, Laura E. Adams, Joshua M. Wong
{"title":"雅培 BinaxNOW COVID-19 抗原卡测试的诊断准确性,波多黎各。","authors":"Zachary J. Madewell,&nbsp;Chelsea G. Major,&nbsp;Nathan Graff,&nbsp;Cameron Adams,&nbsp;Dania M. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Tatiana Morales,&nbsp;Nicole A. Medina Lopes,&nbsp;Rafael Tosado,&nbsp;Liliana Sánchez-González,&nbsp;Janice Perez-Padilla,&nbsp;Hannah R. Volkman,&nbsp;Jorge Bertrán-Pasarell,&nbsp;Diego Sainz de la Peña,&nbsp;Jorge Munoz-Jordan,&nbsp;Gilberto A. Santiago,&nbsp;Olga Lorenzi,&nbsp;Vanessa Rivera-Amill,&nbsp;Melissa A. Rolfes,&nbsp;Gabriela Paz-Bailey,&nbsp;Laura E. Adams,&nbsp;Joshua M. Wong","doi":"10.1111/irv.13305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>BinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1–6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7–14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤ 25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36–40).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision-making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13544,"journal":{"name":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card Test, Puerto Rico\",\"authors\":\"Zachary J. Madewell,&nbsp;Chelsea G. Major,&nbsp;Nathan Graff,&nbsp;Cameron Adams,&nbsp;Dania M. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Tatiana Morales,&nbsp;Nicole A. Medina Lopes,&nbsp;Rafael Tosado,&nbsp;Liliana Sánchez-González,&nbsp;Janice Perez-Padilla,&nbsp;Hannah R. Volkman,&nbsp;Jorge Bertrán-Pasarell,&nbsp;Diego Sainz de la Peña,&nbsp;Jorge Munoz-Jordan,&nbsp;Gilberto A. Santiago,&nbsp;Olga Lorenzi,&nbsp;Vanessa Rivera-Amill,&nbsp;Melissa A. Rolfes,&nbsp;Gabriela Paz-Bailey,&nbsp;Laura E. Adams,&nbsp;Joshua M. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/irv.13305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>BinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1–6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7–14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤ 25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36–40).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>BinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision-making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300111/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.13305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irv.13305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19 大流行凸显了对快速准确诊断工具的需求。2020年8月,雅培BinaxNOW COVID-19抗原卡检测作为SARS-CoV-2分子检测的一种及时、经济的替代方法上市,但其性能可能因时间和症状等因素而有所不同。本研究评估了 BinaxNOW 在不同流行病学背景下的诊断性能:以 RT-PCR 为参考,我们评估了 BinaxNOW COVID-19 检验在 2020 年 12 月至 2023 年 5 月波多黎各两项研究参与者的前鼻拭子中检测 SARS-CoV-2 的性能。根据症状出现后的天数、采集策略、疫苗接种情况、症状、重复检测和 RT-PCR 周期阈值 (Ct) 值对检测性能进行了评估:BinaxNOW的总体灵敏度为84.1%,特异性为98.8%。灵敏度在症状出现后 1-6 天内达到峰值(93.2%),有症状者的灵敏度(86.3%)高于无症状者(67.3%)。在感染过程中,灵敏度有所下降,从最初检测的 96.3% 降至 7-14 天后检测的 48.4%。BinaxNOW 对低 Ct 值(≤ 25)参与者的灵敏度为 99.5%,但对高 Ct 值(36-40)参与者的灵敏度较低(18.2%):BinaxNOW显示出较高的灵敏度和特异性,尤其是在早期感染和有症状的参与者中。在检测灵敏度对临床决策至关重要的情况下,核酸扩增检测是首选。这些发现凸显了在解释检测结果时考虑临床和流行病学背景的重要性,并强调有必要持续开展研究,以调整检测策略,适应新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card Test, Puerto Rico

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts.

Methods

Using RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.

Results

BinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1–6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7–14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤ 25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36–40).

Conclusions

BinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision-making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is the official journal of the International Society of Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Diseases - an independent scientific professional society - dedicated to promoting the prevention, detection, treatment, and control of influenza and other respiratory virus diseases. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is an Open Access journal. Copyright on any research article published by Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses is retained by the author(s). Authors grant Wiley a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. Authors also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and its original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
期刊最新文献
Influenza in Adults Seeking Care at Seven European Emergency Departments: A Prospective Active Surveillance During the 2019–2020 Influenza Season Technological Barriers to Routine Genomic Surveillance for Vaccine Development Against SARS-CoV-2 in Africa: A Systematic Review Virological and Clinical Outcomes of Influenza Outpatients Treated With Baloxavir, Oseltamivir, or Laninamivir in the 2023–2024 Season Impact of Age and Comorbid Conditions on Incidence Rates of COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations, 2020–2021 Evaluating the Economic and Epidemiological Impact of RSV Hospitalizations in Southern Austria [Southern Austria Respiratory Syncytial Virus INpatient Investigation (ARNI Study)]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1