通过无标记运动分析评估运动障碍型脑瘫患者的侧向伸手能力:有效性研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112233
{"title":"通过无标记运动分析评估运动障碍型脑瘫患者的侧向伸手能力:有效性研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate clinical utility of 2D-markerless motion analysis (2DMMA) from a single camera during a reaching-sideways-task in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP) by determining (1) concurrent validity by correlating 2DMMA against marker-based 3D-motion analysis (3DMA) and (2) construct validity by assessing differences in 2DMMA features between DCP and typically developing (TD) peers.</p><p>2DMMA key points were tracked from frontal videos of a single camera by DeepLabCut and accuracy was assessed against human labelling. Shoulder, elbow and wrist angles were calculated from 2DMMA and 3DMA (as gold standard) and correlated to assess concurrent validity. Additionally, execution time and variability features such as mean point-wise standard deviation of the angular trajectories (i.e. shoulder elevation, elbow and wrist flexion/extension) and wrist trajectory deviation by mean overshoot and convex hull were calculated from key points. 2DMMA features were compared between the DCP group and TD peers to assess construct validity.</p><p>Fifty-one individuals (30 DCP;21 TD; age:5–24 years) participated. An accuracy of approximately 1.5 cm was reached for key point tracking. While significant correlations were found for wrist (ρ = 0.810;p &lt; 0.001) and elbow angles (ρ = 0.483;p &lt; 0.001), 2DMMA shoulder angles were not correlated (ρ = 0.247;p = 0.102) to 3DMA. Wrist and elbow angles, execution time and variability features all differed between groups (Effect sizes 0.35–0.81;p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>Videos of a reaching-sideways-task processed by 2DMMA to assess upper extremity movements in DCP showed promising validity. The method is especially valuable to assess movement variability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Markerless motion analysis to assess reaching-sideways in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A validity study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate clinical utility of 2D-markerless motion analysis (2DMMA) from a single camera during a reaching-sideways-task in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP) by determining (1) concurrent validity by correlating 2DMMA against marker-based 3D-motion analysis (3DMA) and (2) construct validity by assessing differences in 2DMMA features between DCP and typically developing (TD) peers.</p><p>2DMMA key points were tracked from frontal videos of a single camera by DeepLabCut and accuracy was assessed against human labelling. Shoulder, elbow and wrist angles were calculated from 2DMMA and 3DMA (as gold standard) and correlated to assess concurrent validity. Additionally, execution time and variability features such as mean point-wise standard deviation of the angular trajectories (i.e. shoulder elevation, elbow and wrist flexion/extension) and wrist trajectory deviation by mean overshoot and convex hull were calculated from key points. 2DMMA features were compared between the DCP group and TD peers to assess construct validity.</p><p>Fifty-one individuals (30 DCP;21 TD; age:5–24 years) participated. An accuracy of approximately 1.5 cm was reached for key point tracking. While significant correlations were found for wrist (ρ = 0.810;p &lt; 0.001) and elbow angles (ρ = 0.483;p &lt; 0.001), 2DMMA shoulder angles were not correlated (ρ = 0.247;p = 0.102) to 3DMA. Wrist and elbow angles, execution time and variability features all differed between groups (Effect sizes 0.35–0.81;p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>Videos of a reaching-sideways-task processed by 2DMMA to assess upper extremity movements in DCP showed promising validity. The method is especially valuable to assess movement variability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003117\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估在脑性瘫痪(DCP)患者的伸手侧向任务中,通过单个摄像头进行的二维无标记运动分析(2DMMA)的临床实用性,具体方法是:(1) 通过将 2DMMA 与基于标记的三维运动分析(3DMA)进行关联,确定其并发有效性;(2) 通过评估 DCP 与典型发育(TD)同龄人之间 2DMMA 特征的差异,确定其构造有效性。DeepLabCut 从单个摄像头的正面视频中跟踪 2DMMA 关键点,并根据人类标记评估其准确性。根据 2DMMA 和 3DMA(作为黄金标准)计算出肩部、肘部和腕部角度,并将其关联起来以评估并发有效性。此外,还根据关键点计算了执行时间和可变性特征,如角度轨迹(即肩部抬高、肘部和腕部弯曲/伸展)的平均点上标准偏差,以及通过平均过冲和凸壳计算的腕部轨迹偏差。比较 DCP 组和 TD 组的 2DMMA 特征,以评估构建有效性。共有 51 人(30 名 DCP;21 名 TD;年龄:5-24 岁)参加。关键点追踪的精确度约为 1.5 厘米。虽然手腕(ρ = 0.810;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Markerless motion analysis to assess reaching-sideways in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy: A validity study

This study aimed to evaluate clinical utility of 2D-markerless motion analysis (2DMMA) from a single camera during a reaching-sideways-task in individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP) by determining (1) concurrent validity by correlating 2DMMA against marker-based 3D-motion analysis (3DMA) and (2) construct validity by assessing differences in 2DMMA features between DCP and typically developing (TD) peers.

2DMMA key points were tracked from frontal videos of a single camera by DeepLabCut and accuracy was assessed against human labelling. Shoulder, elbow and wrist angles were calculated from 2DMMA and 3DMA (as gold standard) and correlated to assess concurrent validity. Additionally, execution time and variability features such as mean point-wise standard deviation of the angular trajectories (i.e. shoulder elevation, elbow and wrist flexion/extension) and wrist trajectory deviation by mean overshoot and convex hull were calculated from key points. 2DMMA features were compared between the DCP group and TD peers to assess construct validity.

Fifty-one individuals (30 DCP;21 TD; age:5–24 years) participated. An accuracy of approximately 1.5 cm was reached for key point tracking. While significant correlations were found for wrist (ρ = 0.810;p < 0.001) and elbow angles (ρ = 0.483;p < 0.001), 2DMMA shoulder angles were not correlated (ρ = 0.247;p = 0.102) to 3DMA. Wrist and elbow angles, execution time and variability features all differed between groups (Effect sizes 0.35–0.81;p < 0.05).

Videos of a reaching-sideways-task processed by 2DMMA to assess upper extremity movements in DCP showed promising validity. The method is especially valuable to assess movement variability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Intervertebral disc deformation in the lower lumbar spine during object lifting measured in vivo using indwelling bone pins. Energetic scaling behavior of patterned epithelium A clinical investigation of force plate drift error on predicted joint kinetics during gait. Strategies for unplanned gait termination at comfortable and fast walking speeds in children with cerebral palsy. Effects of foot orthoses application during walking on lower limb joint angles and moments in adults with flat Feet: A systematic review with Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1