对常规认知行为疗法无效的强迫症患者进行多方面、简短的强化家庭暴露疗法:一项非对照试点研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychiatric Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000796
Karin C P Remmerswaal, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Willemijn D Scholten, Anton J L M van Balkom
{"title":"对常规认知行为疗法无效的强迫症患者进行多方面、简短的强化家庭暴露疗法:一项非对照试点研究。","authors":"Karin C P Remmerswaal, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Willemijn D Scholten, Anton J L M van Balkom","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test a multifaceted treatment program for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who did not respond to regular cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment addresses several factors that may play a role in maintaining OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a treatment consisting of a 6-day intensive, individual exposure in vivo with response prevention (ERP) format, with 24 therapist-assisted treatment hours at the patient's home and 12 self-controlled ERP hours, including behavioral activation and family interventions. Next, we investigated the effect (obsessive-compulsive symptoms, comorbidity, functioning, quality of life, OCD-related interaction patterns) and feasibility (dropout, treatment satisfaction, and organization) of this program using pre-post-tests, pre-follow-up tests, and qualitative data from patients, family members, and therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a sample of 22 participants, obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS pre: 28.7, post: 15.9; Wilcoxon S-R tests P<0.01) improved significantly, as did most other effect measures. Results were largely, but not completely, preserved at 3-month follow-up. There was only 1 dropout. Patients, family members, and therapists were satisfied with the treatment. Implementation of the treatment did not pose difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In nonresponders with OCD, a multifaceted, brief, intensive home-based ERP program targeting factors maintaining OCD is promising and feasible. Extra care is needed to maintain improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"30 4","pages":"297-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11280449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multifaceted, Brief Intensive Home-Based Exposure Treatment in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Who are Nonresponsive to Regular Cognitive Behavior Therapy: An Uncontrolled Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Karin C P Remmerswaal, Neeltje M Batelaan, Patricia van Oppen, Willemijn D Scholten, Anton J L M van Balkom\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test a multifaceted treatment program for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who did not respond to regular cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment addresses several factors that may play a role in maintaining OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a treatment consisting of a 6-day intensive, individual exposure in vivo with response prevention (ERP) format, with 24 therapist-assisted treatment hours at the patient's home and 12 self-controlled ERP hours, including behavioral activation and family interventions. Next, we investigated the effect (obsessive-compulsive symptoms, comorbidity, functioning, quality of life, OCD-related interaction patterns) and feasibility (dropout, treatment satisfaction, and organization) of this program using pre-post-tests, pre-follow-up tests, and qualitative data from patients, family members, and therapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a sample of 22 participants, obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS pre: 28.7, post: 15.9; Wilcoxon S-R tests P<0.01) improved significantly, as did most other effect measures. Results were largely, but not completely, preserved at 3-month follow-up. There was only 1 dropout. Patients, family members, and therapists were satisfied with the treatment. Implementation of the treatment did not pose difficulties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In nonresponders with OCD, a multifaceted, brief, intensive home-based ERP program targeting factors maintaining OCD is promising and feasible. Extra care is needed to maintain improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"297-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11280449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychiatric Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000796\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的测试针对常规认知行为疗法(CBT)无效的强迫症(OCD)患者的多方面治疗方案。该治疗针对可能导致强迫症持续存在的几个因素:我们设计了一种治疗方法,包括为期 6 天的强化个体暴露与反应预防(ERP)模式,其中 24 个小时由治疗师在患者家中协助治疗,12 个小时由患者自行控制ERP,包括行为激活和家庭干预。接下来,我们利用前后测试、随访前测试以及来自患者、家庭成员和治疗师的定性数据,对该计划的效果(强迫症状、合并症、功能、生活质量、与强迫症相关的互动模式)和可行性(辍学率、治疗满意度和组织性)进行了调查:结果:在 22 名参与者的样本中,强迫症状(Y-BOCS 前测:28.7,后测:15.9;Wilcoxon)均有所下降:15.9; Wilcoxon S-R tests PConclusions:对于无应答的强迫症患者,针对维持强迫症因素的多方面、简短、强化的家庭ERP项目是有前景的,也是可行的。但需要格外注意以保持改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multifaceted, Brief Intensive Home-Based Exposure Treatment in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Who are Nonresponsive to Regular Cognitive Behavior Therapy: An Uncontrolled Pilot Study.

Objective: To test a multifaceted treatment program for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who did not respond to regular cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). The treatment addresses several factors that may play a role in maintaining OCD.

Methods: We designed a treatment consisting of a 6-day intensive, individual exposure in vivo with response prevention (ERP) format, with 24 therapist-assisted treatment hours at the patient's home and 12 self-controlled ERP hours, including behavioral activation and family interventions. Next, we investigated the effect (obsessive-compulsive symptoms, comorbidity, functioning, quality of life, OCD-related interaction patterns) and feasibility (dropout, treatment satisfaction, and organization) of this program using pre-post-tests, pre-follow-up tests, and qualitative data from patients, family members, and therapists.

Results: In a sample of 22 participants, obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS pre: 28.7, post: 15.9; Wilcoxon S-R tests P<0.01) improved significantly, as did most other effect measures. Results were largely, but not completely, preserved at 3-month follow-up. There was only 1 dropout. Patients, family members, and therapists were satisfied with the treatment. Implementation of the treatment did not pose difficulties.

Conclusions: In nonresponders with OCD, a multifaceted, brief, intensive home-based ERP program targeting factors maintaining OCD is promising and feasible. Extra care is needed to maintain improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Hopelessness in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. A False-positive Diagnosis of a Lethal Serotonin Syndrome Based on Postmortem Whole-blood Levels of Sertraline: How Forensic Detective Work Uses Medical Knowledge and Clinical Pharmacology to Solve Cases. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for an Emerging Adult Female With Misophonia: A Case Study. Depression and the Olympics. Eating Behaviors Associated With Suicidal Behaviors and Overall Risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1