使用环形牵引器观察胎儿解剖:随机对照试验

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005689
Melissa L Wise, Marvin Okon, Katelyn N Pratt, Andrew S Lane, Laura M Carlson, Kacey Y Eichelberger, Amy H Crockett, Lu Zhang, Daniel N Pasko
{"title":"使用环形牵引器观察胎儿解剖:随机对照试验","authors":"Melissa L Wise, Marvin Okon, Katelyn N Pratt, Andrew S Lane, Laura M Carlson, Kacey Y Eichelberger, Amy H Crockett, Lu Zhang, Daniel N Pasko","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether use of a panniculus retractor device for pregnant patients with body mass index (BMI) 40 or higher and a panniculus improves the completion rate of the fetal anatomic examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized trial in which eligible patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus were randomized to undergo their detailed fetal anatomic examination with a panniculus retractor device in place compared with usual care. The primary outcome was the completion rate of 16 prespecified views from the anatomic examination. Secondary outcomes included completion rate of all 64 views from our institution's detailed anatomic examination, duration of examination, major fetal anomaly detection rate, depth from the skin to amniotic cavity before and after retractor placement, patient and ultrasonographer satisfaction, and prespecified adverse events. We assumed a baseline completion rate of 23% for the primary outcome and targeted a twofold improvement with 80% power and two-sided α of 0.05, which resulted in a sample size of 132 participants. The goal enrollment was increased to 150 participants to account for potential dropout. Statistical tests included the Student's t test, χ 2 , and relative risks (RRs) as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March to July of 2023, 150 participants completed the study: 74 in the retractor group and 76 in the usual care group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for panniculus grade. The completion rate of 16 prespecified views was 25.7% (19/74) in the retractor group and 31.6% (24/76) in the control group (RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.49-1.35). There were no significant differences between groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Patient satisfaction and ultrasonographer satisfaction were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a panniculus retractor device during the fetal anatomic examination for patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus was well tolerated by patients and ultrasonographers but did not improve the completion rate of 16 prespecified fetal anatomic views.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05764408.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Panniculus Retractor Use for Visualization of Fetal Anatomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa L Wise, Marvin Okon, Katelyn N Pratt, Andrew S Lane, Laura M Carlson, Kacey Y Eichelberger, Amy H Crockett, Lu Zhang, Daniel N Pasko\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether use of a panniculus retractor device for pregnant patients with body mass index (BMI) 40 or higher and a panniculus improves the completion rate of the fetal anatomic examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized trial in which eligible patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus were randomized to undergo their detailed fetal anatomic examination with a panniculus retractor device in place compared with usual care. The primary outcome was the completion rate of 16 prespecified views from the anatomic examination. Secondary outcomes included completion rate of all 64 views from our institution's detailed anatomic examination, duration of examination, major fetal anomaly detection rate, depth from the skin to amniotic cavity before and after retractor placement, patient and ultrasonographer satisfaction, and prespecified adverse events. We assumed a baseline completion rate of 23% for the primary outcome and targeted a twofold improvement with 80% power and two-sided α of 0.05, which resulted in a sample size of 132 participants. The goal enrollment was increased to 150 participants to account for potential dropout. Statistical tests included the Student's t test, χ 2 , and relative risks (RRs) as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March to July of 2023, 150 participants completed the study: 74 in the retractor group and 76 in the usual care group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for panniculus grade. The completion rate of 16 prespecified views was 25.7% (19/74) in the retractor group and 31.6% (24/76) in the control group (RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.49-1.35). There were no significant differences between groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Patient satisfaction and ultrasonographer satisfaction were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a panniculus retractor device during the fetal anatomic examination for patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus was well tolerated by patients and ultrasonographers but did not improve the completion rate of 16 prespecified fetal anatomic views.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05764408.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005689\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估对体重指数(BMI)大于或等于 40 且有脐带绕颈的孕妇使用脐带牵引器是否能提高胎儿解剖检查的完成率:这是一项随机试验,与常规护理相比,符合条件的体重指数(BMI)为 40 或以上且有脐带的患者被随机分配到安装了脐带牵引装置的医院接受详细的胎儿解剖检查。主要结果是解剖检查中 16 个预先指定视图的完成率。次要结果包括本机构详细解剖检查中所有 64 个切面的完成率、检查持续时间、主要胎儿异常检出率、放置牵引器前后皮肤到羊膜腔的深度、患者和超声技师的满意度以及预先指定的不良事件。我们假设主要结果的基线完成率为 23%,目标是在功率为 80% 且双侧 α 为 0.05 的情况下提高两倍,因此样本量为 132 人。考虑到可能出现的辍学情况,目标注册人数增加到 150 人。统计检验包括学生 t 检验、χ2 和适当的相对风险 (RR):从 2023 年 3 月到 7 月,150 名参与者完成了研究:牵引器组 74 人,常规护理组 76 人。各组之间的基线特征相似,但泛酸等级除外。牵引器组 16 个预设视图的完成率为 25.7%(19/74),对照组为 31.6%(24/76)(RR 0.81,95% CI,0.49-1.35)。各组间的次要结果无明显差异。两组患者的满意度和超声波医师的满意度相似:结论:对于体重指数(BMI)40或更高且有绒毛膜的患者,在胎儿解剖检查过程中使用绒毛膜牵开器对患者和超声技师的耐受性良好,但并未提高16个预先指定的胎儿解剖视图的完成率:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT05764408。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Panniculus Retractor Use for Visualization of Fetal Anatomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate whether use of a panniculus retractor device for pregnant patients with body mass index (BMI) 40 or higher and a panniculus improves the completion rate of the fetal anatomic examination.

Methods: This was a randomized trial in which eligible patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus were randomized to undergo their detailed fetal anatomic examination with a panniculus retractor device in place compared with usual care. The primary outcome was the completion rate of 16 prespecified views from the anatomic examination. Secondary outcomes included completion rate of all 64 views from our institution's detailed anatomic examination, duration of examination, major fetal anomaly detection rate, depth from the skin to amniotic cavity before and after retractor placement, patient and ultrasonographer satisfaction, and prespecified adverse events. We assumed a baseline completion rate of 23% for the primary outcome and targeted a twofold improvement with 80% power and two-sided α of 0.05, which resulted in a sample size of 132 participants. The goal enrollment was increased to 150 participants to account for potential dropout. Statistical tests included the Student's t test, χ 2 , and relative risks (RRs) as appropriate.

Results: From March to July of 2023, 150 participants completed the study: 74 in the retractor group and 76 in the usual care group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups except for panniculus grade. The completion rate of 16 prespecified views was 25.7% (19/74) in the retractor group and 31.6% (24/76) in the control group (RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.49-1.35). There were no significant differences between groups for any of the secondary outcomes. Patient satisfaction and ultrasonographer satisfaction were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Use of a panniculus retractor device during the fetal anatomic examination for patients with BMI 40 or higher and a panniculus was well tolerated by patients and ultrasonographers but did not improve the completion rate of 16 prespecified fetal anatomic views.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05764408.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Test Results With Rapid Seroreversion After Third-Trimester Tdap Booster Vaccination. Compliance Rate With Triage Test and Treatment for Participants Screening Positive in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy During Pregnancy on Postpartum Blood Pressure Control. Management of Vulvovaginal Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Navigating the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights and Medical Training After LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1