João Mendes, Adriana Rocha Guimarães, Joana Martins Ribeiro, Bárbara Oliveiros, Luís Alcides Mesquita, Maria Helena Fernandes, Francisco José Fernandes do Vale, Henriqueta Coimbra Silva
{"title":"葡萄牙人群中的候选基因研究:MTHFR、IRF6、PAX7 和 TP63 SNPs 在非综合征性口裂易感性中的作用。","authors":"João Mendes, Adriana Rocha Guimarães, Joana Martins Ribeiro, Bárbara Oliveiros, Luís Alcides Mesquita, Maria Helena Fernandes, Francisco José Fernandes do Vale, Henriqueta Coimbra Silva","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NSOC) is a complex phenotype, involving multiple genetic and environmental factors. Association studies exploring the genetic susceptibility to this prevalent oral malformation show variability of results in different populations. Using a candidate gene approach, we aimed to verify the role of four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the susceptibility to NSOC in Portuguese patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 254 non-consanguineous individuals of Portuguese were recruited, including 120 patients with NSOC and 134 controls. About 92% of these patients had non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and 8% had only non-syndromic cleft palate (NSCP). SNPs in the <i>MTHFR</i> (rs1801133), <i>IRF6</i> (rs642961), <i>PAX7</i> (rs742071) and <i>TP63</i> (rs9332461) genes were studied, using a real-time approach with TaqMan probes. Allelic, genotypic, dominant, recessive and over-dominant models were explored using a chi-squared test. Adjusted <i>p-</i>value was calculated for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. For <i>MTHFR</i>, <i>IRF6</i>, and <i>PAX7</i> SNPs, no statistically significant difference was highlighted for any of the evaluated models. For <i>TP63</i> SNP, data fitted an over-dominant model, with a protective effect for heterozygotes (OR 1.897; CI 95% [1.144–3.147]; <i>p</i> < .016, when comparing controls vs. cases), but significance was lost when applying adjusted <i>p</i>-value for multiple comparisons (4 × 5 tests).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this Portuguese population, there was no evidence of an association between the evaluated SNPs and NSOC. For <i>TP63</i> SNP, the possibility of a protective effect of heterozygotes should be further investigated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of MTHFR, IRF6, PAX7 and TP63 SNPs in susceptibility to non-syndromic orofacial cleft, a candidate gene study in a Portuguese population\",\"authors\":\"João Mendes, Adriana Rocha Guimarães, Joana Martins Ribeiro, Bárbara Oliveiros, Luís Alcides Mesquita, Maria Helena Fernandes, Francisco José Fernandes do Vale, Henriqueta Coimbra Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NSOC) is a complex phenotype, involving multiple genetic and environmental factors. Association studies exploring the genetic susceptibility to this prevalent oral malformation show variability of results in different populations. Using a candidate gene approach, we aimed to verify the role of four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the susceptibility to NSOC in Portuguese patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 254 non-consanguineous individuals of Portuguese were recruited, including 120 patients with NSOC and 134 controls. About 92% of these patients had non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and 8% had only non-syndromic cleft palate (NSCP). SNPs in the <i>MTHFR</i> (rs1801133), <i>IRF6</i> (rs642961), <i>PAX7</i> (rs742071) and <i>TP63</i> (rs9332461) genes were studied, using a real-time approach with TaqMan probes. Allelic, genotypic, dominant, recessive and over-dominant models were explored using a chi-squared test. Adjusted <i>p-</i>value was calculated for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. For <i>MTHFR</i>, <i>IRF6</i>, and <i>PAX7</i> SNPs, no statistically significant difference was highlighted for any of the evaluated models. For <i>TP63</i> SNP, data fitted an over-dominant model, with a protective effect for heterozygotes (OR 1.897; CI 95% [1.144–3.147]; <i>p</i> < .016, when comparing controls vs. cases), but significance was lost when applying adjusted <i>p</i>-value for multiple comparisons (4 × 5 tests).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this Portuguese population, there was no evidence of an association between the evaluated SNPs and NSOC. For <i>TP63</i> SNP, the possibility of a protective effect of heterozygotes should be further investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:非综合征性口面裂(NSOC)是一种复杂的表型,涉及多种遗传和环境因素。对这种常见口腔畸形的遗传易感性进行的关联研究显示,不同人群的结果存在差异。我们采用候选基因方法,旨在验证四个单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)在葡萄牙患者NSOC易感性中的作用:我们共招募了 254 名非近亲结婚的葡萄牙人,其中包括 120 名 NSOC 患者和 134 名对照者。其中约 92% 的患者患有非综合征唇裂伴或不伴腭裂(NSCL/P),8% 的患者仅患有非综合征腭裂(NSCP)。采用 TaqMan 探针实时方法研究了 MTHFR(rs1801133)、IRF6(rs642961)、PAX7(rs742071)和 TP63(rs9332461)基因中的 SNPs。使用卡方检验探讨了等位基因、基因型、显性、隐性和过显性模型。使用本杰明-霍奇伯格假发现率(FDR)计算多重比较的调整 p 值:所有 SNP 均处于 Hardy-Weinberg 平衡状态。就 MTHFR、IRF6 和 PAX7 SNPs 而言,任何一个评估模型都没有突出的统计学差异。就 TP63 SNP 而言,数据符合超显性模型,杂合子具有保护作用(OR 1.897;CI 95% [1.144-3.147];P 结论:在葡萄牙人群中,并没有发现对 TP63 SNP 有保护作用的杂合子(OR 1.897;CI 95% [1.144-3.147]):在这一葡萄牙人群中,没有证据表明所评估的 SNP 与 NSOC 存在关联。对于 TP63 SNP,应进一步研究杂合子是否具有保护作用。
Role of MTHFR, IRF6, PAX7 and TP63 SNPs in susceptibility to non-syndromic orofacial cleft, a candidate gene study in a Portuguese population
Background
Non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NSOC) is a complex phenotype, involving multiple genetic and environmental factors. Association studies exploring the genetic susceptibility to this prevalent oral malformation show variability of results in different populations. Using a candidate gene approach, we aimed to verify the role of four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the susceptibility to NSOC in Portuguese patients.
Methods
A total of 254 non-consanguineous individuals of Portuguese were recruited, including 120 patients with NSOC and 134 controls. About 92% of these patients had non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) and 8% had only non-syndromic cleft palate (NSCP). SNPs in the MTHFR (rs1801133), IRF6 (rs642961), PAX7 (rs742071) and TP63 (rs9332461) genes were studied, using a real-time approach with TaqMan probes. Allelic, genotypic, dominant, recessive and over-dominant models were explored using a chi-squared test. Adjusted p-value was calculated for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR).
Results
All SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. For MTHFR, IRF6, and PAX7 SNPs, no statistically significant difference was highlighted for any of the evaluated models. For TP63 SNP, data fitted an over-dominant model, with a protective effect for heterozygotes (OR 1.897; CI 95% [1.144–3.147]; p < .016, when comparing controls vs. cases), but significance was lost when applying adjusted p-value for multiple comparisons (4 × 5 tests).
Conclusion
In this Portuguese population, there was no evidence of an association between the evaluated SNPs and NSOC. For TP63 SNP, the possibility of a protective effect of heterozygotes should be further investigated.