不同剥壳方法对减少玉米黄曲霉毒素污染田间筛选过程中数据变异性的影响

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Toxins Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.3390/toxins16070324
Alison Adams, Daniel Jeffers, Shien Lu, Baozhu Guo, W Paul Williams, Jake C Fountain
{"title":"不同剥壳方法对减少玉米黄曲霉毒素污染田间筛选过程中数据变异性的影响","authors":"Alison Adams, Daniel Jeffers, Shien Lu, Baozhu Guo, W Paul Williams, Jake C Fountain","doi":"10.3390/toxins16070324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-genetic variation limits the identification of novel maize germplasm with genetic markers for reduced <i>Aspergillus flavus</i> infection and aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin measurements can vary substantially within fields containing the same germplasm following inoculation with <i>A. flavus</i>. While some variation is expected due to microenvironmental differences, components of field screening methodologies may also contribute to variability in collected data. Therefore, the objective of this study is to test the effects of three different shelling methods (whole ear (WE), ear end removal (EER), and inoculation site-surrounding (ISS)) to obtain bulk samples from maize on aflatoxin measurements. Five ears per row of three inbred lines and two hybrids were inoculated with <i>A. flavus</i>, then shelled using the three different methods, and aflatoxin was quantified. Overall, EER and ISS resulted in reduced coefficients of variance (CVs) in comparison to WE for both inbred and hybrid maize lines, with two exceptions. Susceptible B73 showed increased CVs with both EER and ISS compared to WE, and resistant Mp719's EER CVs marginally increased compared to WE. While WE is the standard practice for most breeding programs due to its technical simplicity, EER and ISS may allow for finely phenotyping parental lines for further breeding applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11281036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Shelling Methods on Data Variability during Field Screening for Reduced Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Adams, Daniel Jeffers, Shien Lu, Baozhu Guo, W Paul Williams, Jake C Fountain\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxins16070324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-genetic variation limits the identification of novel maize germplasm with genetic markers for reduced <i>Aspergillus flavus</i> infection and aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin measurements can vary substantially within fields containing the same germplasm following inoculation with <i>A. flavus</i>. While some variation is expected due to microenvironmental differences, components of field screening methodologies may also contribute to variability in collected data. Therefore, the objective of this study is to test the effects of three different shelling methods (whole ear (WE), ear end removal (EER), and inoculation site-surrounding (ISS)) to obtain bulk samples from maize on aflatoxin measurements. Five ears per row of three inbred lines and two hybrids were inoculated with <i>A. flavus</i>, then shelled using the three different methods, and aflatoxin was quantified. Overall, EER and ISS resulted in reduced coefficients of variance (CVs) in comparison to WE for both inbred and hybrid maize lines, with two exceptions. Susceptible B73 showed increased CVs with both EER and ISS compared to WE, and resistant Mp719's EER CVs marginally increased compared to WE. While WE is the standard practice for most breeding programs due to its technical simplicity, EER and ISS may allow for finely phenotyping parental lines for further breeding applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxins\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11281036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16070324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16070324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非遗传变异限制了具有减少黄曲霉感染和黄曲霉毒素污染遗传标记的新型玉米种质的鉴定。黄曲霉菌接种后,在含有相同种质的田块中,黄曲霉毒素的测量结果会有很大差异。虽然微环境的差异会导致一些差异,但田间筛选方法的一些组成部分也可能导致所收集数据的差异。因此,本研究的目的是测试三种不同的脱壳方法(整穗法(WE)、去穗端法(EER)和接种点包围法(ISS))对玉米黄曲霉毒素测量结果的影响。用黄曲霉菌接种三个近交系和两个杂交种的玉米,每行五穗,然后用三种不同的方法脱壳,并对黄曲霉毒素进行定量。总体而言,EER 和 ISS 与 WE 相比,降低了玉米近交系和杂交种的方差系数(CV),但有两个例外。与 WE 相比,抗性 B73 的 EER 和 ISS 的方差系数都有所增加;与 WE 相比,抗性 Mp719 的 EER 方差系数略有增加。虽然 WE 因其技术简单而成为大多数育种项目的标准做法,但 EER 和 ISS 可对亲本品系进行精细表型,以便进一步育种应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Different Shelling Methods on Data Variability during Field Screening for Reduced Aflatoxin Contamination in Maize.

Non-genetic variation limits the identification of novel maize germplasm with genetic markers for reduced Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin measurements can vary substantially within fields containing the same germplasm following inoculation with A. flavus. While some variation is expected due to microenvironmental differences, components of field screening methodologies may also contribute to variability in collected data. Therefore, the objective of this study is to test the effects of three different shelling methods (whole ear (WE), ear end removal (EER), and inoculation site-surrounding (ISS)) to obtain bulk samples from maize on aflatoxin measurements. Five ears per row of three inbred lines and two hybrids were inoculated with A. flavus, then shelled using the three different methods, and aflatoxin was quantified. Overall, EER and ISS resulted in reduced coefficients of variance (CVs) in comparison to WE for both inbred and hybrid maize lines, with two exceptions. Susceptible B73 showed increased CVs with both EER and ISS compared to WE, and resistant Mp719's EER CVs marginally increased compared to WE. While WE is the standard practice for most breeding programs due to its technical simplicity, EER and ISS may allow for finely phenotyping parental lines for further breeding applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Thermoregulation Effects of Phoneutria nigriventer Isolated Toxins in Rats Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Diverse Expression of Scorpion Toxin Genes in Mesobuthus martensii The Contrasting Effects of Bothrops lanceolatus and Bothrops atrox Venom on Procoagulant Activity and Thrombus Stability under Blood Flow Conditions Astaxanthin Alleviates Hepatic Lipid Metabolic Dysregulation Induced by Microcystin-LR Exposure of Cattle Breeding Herds to Naturally Co-Contaminated Zearalenone and Deoxynivalenol: The Relevance of a Urinary Mycotoxin Monitoring System for Herd Health and Food Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1