Mijung Kim, Yun Jung Kim, Young Seok Kim, Tai Suk Roh, Eun-Ju Lee, Jin-Hyung Shim, Eun Hye Kang, Min Ji Kim, In Sik Yun
{"title":"使用 3D 打印植入物进行耳部重建的一年期结果。","authors":"Mijung Kim, Yun Jung Kim, Young Seok Kim, Tai Suk Roh, Eun-Ju Lee, Jin-Hyung Shim, Eun Hye Kang, Min Ji Kim, In Sik Yun","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>External ear reconstruction has been a challenging subject for plastic surgeons for decades. Popular methods using autologous costal cartilage or polyethylene still have their drawbacks. With the advance of three-dimensional (3D) printing technique, bioscaffold engineering using synthetic polymer draws attention as an alternative. This is a clinical trial of ear reconstruction using 3D printed scaffold, presented with clinical results after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021 to 2022, five adult patients with unilateral microtia underwent two-staged total ear reconstruction using 3D printed implants. For each patient, a patient-specific 3D printed scaffold was designed and produced with polycaprolactone (PCL) based on computed tomography images, using fused deposition modeling. Computed tomography scan was obtained preoperatively, within 2 weeks following the surgery and after 1 year, to compare the volume of the normal side and the reconstructed ear. At 1-year visit, clinical photo was taken for scoring by two surgeons and patients themselves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five patients had completely healed reconstructed ear at 1-year follow-up. On average, the volume of reconstructed ear was 161.54% of that of the normal side ear. In a range of 0 to 10, objective assessors gave scores 3 to 6, whereas patients gave scores 8 to 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External ear reconstruction using 3D printed PCL implant showed durable, safe results reflected by excellent volume restoration and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Further clinical follow-up with more cases and refinement of scaffold with advancing bioprinting technique is anticipated. The study's plan and results have been registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS No. 3-2019-0306) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS No. 1182).</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"65 8","pages":"456-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Year Results of Ear Reconstruction with 3D Printed Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Mijung Kim, Yun Jung Kim, Young Seok Kim, Tai Suk Roh, Eun-Ju Lee, Jin-Hyung Shim, Eun Hye Kang, Min Ji Kim, In Sik Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.3349/ymj.2023.0444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>External ear reconstruction has been a challenging subject for plastic surgeons for decades. Popular methods using autologous costal cartilage or polyethylene still have their drawbacks. With the advance of three-dimensional (3D) printing technique, bioscaffold engineering using synthetic polymer draws attention as an alternative. This is a clinical trial of ear reconstruction using 3D printed scaffold, presented with clinical results after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2021 to 2022, five adult patients with unilateral microtia underwent two-staged total ear reconstruction using 3D printed implants. For each patient, a patient-specific 3D printed scaffold was designed and produced with polycaprolactone (PCL) based on computed tomography images, using fused deposition modeling. Computed tomography scan was obtained preoperatively, within 2 weeks following the surgery and after 1 year, to compare the volume of the normal side and the reconstructed ear. At 1-year visit, clinical photo was taken for scoring by two surgeons and patients themselves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five patients had completely healed reconstructed ear at 1-year follow-up. On average, the volume of reconstructed ear was 161.54% of that of the normal side ear. In a range of 0 to 10, objective assessors gave scores 3 to 6, whereas patients gave scores 8 to 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External ear reconstruction using 3D printed PCL implant showed durable, safe results reflected by excellent volume restoration and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Further clinical follow-up with more cases and refinement of scaffold with advancing bioprinting technique is anticipated. The study's plan and results have been registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS No. 3-2019-0306) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS No. 1182).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"65 8\",\"pages\":\"456-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0444\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:几十年来,外耳重建一直是整形外科医生面临的挑战。使用自体肋软骨或聚乙烯的流行方法仍有其缺点。随着三维(3D)打印技术的发展,使用合成聚合物的生物支架工程作为一种替代方法备受关注。这是一项使用三维打印支架进行耳部重建的临床试验,展示了一年后的临床结果:从 2021 年到 2022 年,5 名单侧小耳畸形的成年患者接受了两阶段的全耳重建手术,使用的是 3D 打印植入物。根据计算机断层扫描图像,使用熔融沉积建模技术为每位患者设计并制作了患者专用的聚己内酯(PCL)3D 打印支架。术前、术后两周内和一年后分别进行计算机断层扫描,以比较正常侧和重建耳的体积。一年后,由两名外科医生和患者本人拍摄临床照片进行评分:结果:随访一年时,五名患者的再造耳均已完全愈合。平均而言,再造耳的体积是正常侧耳体积的 161.54%。在0至10分的范围内,客观评估者给出的分数为3至6分,而患者给出的分数为8至10分:结论:使用 3D 打印 PCL 植入体进行外耳再造显示出持久、安全的效果,术后 1 年的容积恢复良好,患者满意度高。随着生物打印技术的不断进步,预计将有更多病例接受进一步的临床随访,并对支架进行改进。该研究的计划和结果已在临床研究信息服务机构(CRIS 编号:3-2019-0306)和食品药品安全部(MFDS 编号:1182)注册。
One-Year Results of Ear Reconstruction with 3D Printed Implants.
Purpose: External ear reconstruction has been a challenging subject for plastic surgeons for decades. Popular methods using autologous costal cartilage or polyethylene still have their drawbacks. With the advance of three-dimensional (3D) printing technique, bioscaffold engineering using synthetic polymer draws attention as an alternative. This is a clinical trial of ear reconstruction using 3D printed scaffold, presented with clinical results after 1 year.
Materials and methods: From 2021 to 2022, five adult patients with unilateral microtia underwent two-staged total ear reconstruction using 3D printed implants. For each patient, a patient-specific 3D printed scaffold was designed and produced with polycaprolactone (PCL) based on computed tomography images, using fused deposition modeling. Computed tomography scan was obtained preoperatively, within 2 weeks following the surgery and after 1 year, to compare the volume of the normal side and the reconstructed ear. At 1-year visit, clinical photo was taken for scoring by two surgeons and patients themselves.
Results: All five patients had completely healed reconstructed ear at 1-year follow-up. On average, the volume of reconstructed ear was 161.54% of that of the normal side ear. In a range of 0 to 10, objective assessors gave scores 3 to 6, whereas patients gave scores 8 to 10.
Conclusion: External ear reconstruction using 3D printed PCL implant showed durable, safe results reflected by excellent volume restoration and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Further clinical follow-up with more cases and refinement of scaffold with advancing bioprinting technique is anticipated. The study's plan and results have been registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS No. 3-2019-0306) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS No. 1182).
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.