针对青少年的共同设计游戏化农场伤害预防教育资源的试点评估。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716
Amy E Peden, Faye McMillan, Dennis Alonzo, Richard C Franklin
{"title":"针对青少年的共同设计游戏化农场伤害预防教育资源的试点评估。","authors":"Amy E Peden, Faye McMillan, Dennis Alonzo, Richard C Franklin","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adolescents are at-risk of fatal and non-fatal injuries in the farm environment. School-based agricultural safety and farm injury prevention education is likely to be more effective when utilizing co-designed and gamification principles; however, this needs to be tested. This study examined data from a pilot evaluation of a co-designed farm injury prevention gamified educational resource for adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online, anonymous surveys were conducted with students studying agriculture in regional Australia who had previously participated in the co-design process to develop \"Calm Your Farm\". Three courses were developed (vehicles, workshop, and water safety) and before and after playing each of the courses for the first time, students completed survey questions regarding self-reported knowledge on the course topic, and assessment of content, design, ease of play, and how much they learned. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi square tests of association, and independent sample t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 66 responses (66.7% male; 60.6% aged 13 years). Staged course release meant all respondents assessed the vehicle and workshop courses, while 58% assessed the water safety course. Vehicle and workshop courses were rated 7.64 out of a possible 10 (SD = 1.85) and 7.65 (SD = 1.78), respectively, for the information presented, slightly higher than water safety (7.47 [SD = 1.91]). Statistically significant improvements in self-reported knowledge post play were seen among boys for the water safety course (63% said knowledge improved; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.98; <i>p</i> = .026) and 13-year-olds for vehicles (35%; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.31; <i>p</i> = .038) and workshop safety (50%; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.29; <i>p</i> = .038). Respondents indicated being more likely to replay the game at school (<i>M</i> = 6.62 [SD = 2.96]) than at home (<i>M</i> = 5.57 [SD = 3.07]). Of respondents, 61% (<i>n</i> = 40) agreed that \"Calm Your Farm\" taught them more about farm safety and was more fun than other farm safety education previously received. Tractor safety (62%), chemical safety (58%), and firearm safety (58%) were the most popular topics suggested to be added to the game.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The co-design and gamification approach taken with \"Calm Your Farm\" appeared to be successful in improving self-reported knowledge around farm injury prevention and was perceived by 62% of the respondents as being fun and educational. Future expansion should incorporate student suggested topics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"615-625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Evaluation of a Co-Designed Gamified Farm Injury Prevention Educational Resource for Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Amy E Peden, Faye McMillan, Dennis Alonzo, Richard C Franklin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adolescents are at-risk of fatal and non-fatal injuries in the farm environment. School-based agricultural safety and farm injury prevention education is likely to be more effective when utilizing co-designed and gamification principles; however, this needs to be tested. This study examined data from a pilot evaluation of a co-designed farm injury prevention gamified educational resource for adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online, anonymous surveys were conducted with students studying agriculture in regional Australia who had previously participated in the co-design process to develop \\\"Calm Your Farm\\\". Three courses were developed (vehicles, workshop, and water safety) and before and after playing each of the courses for the first time, students completed survey questions regarding self-reported knowledge on the course topic, and assessment of content, design, ease of play, and how much they learned. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi square tests of association, and independent sample t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 66 responses (66.7% male; 60.6% aged 13 years). Staged course release meant all respondents assessed the vehicle and workshop courses, while 58% assessed the water safety course. Vehicle and workshop courses were rated 7.64 out of a possible 10 (SD = 1.85) and 7.65 (SD = 1.78), respectively, for the information presented, slightly higher than water safety (7.47 [SD = 1.91]). Statistically significant improvements in self-reported knowledge post play were seen among boys for the water safety course (63% said knowledge improved; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.98; <i>p</i> = .026) and 13-year-olds for vehicles (35%; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.31; <i>p</i> = .038) and workshop safety (50%; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.29; <i>p</i> = .038). Respondents indicated being more likely to replay the game at school (<i>M</i> = 6.62 [SD = 2.96]) than at home (<i>M</i> = 5.57 [SD = 3.07]). Of respondents, 61% (<i>n</i> = 40) agreed that \\\"Calm Your Farm\\\" taught them more about farm safety and was more fun than other farm safety education previously received. Tractor safety (62%), chemical safety (58%), and firearm safety (58%) were the most popular topics suggested to be added to the game.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The co-design and gamification approach taken with \\\"Calm Your Farm\\\" appeared to be successful in improving self-reported knowledge around farm injury prevention and was perceived by 62% of the respondents as being fun and educational. Future expansion should incorporate student suggested topics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"615-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2382716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:青少年在农场环境中面临致命和非致命伤害的风险。如果采用共同设计和游戏化原则,校本农业安全和农场伤害预防教育可能会更有效;然而,这需要进行测试。本研究考察了针对青少年的共同设计的农场伤害预防游戏化教育资源的试点评估数据:方法:对澳大利亚地区学习农业的学生进行了在线匿名调查,这些学生之前曾参与过 "让你的农场平静下来 "的共同设计过程。开发了三门课程(车辆、工作坊和水安全),在首次学习每门课程之前和之后,学生们完成了有关自我报告的课程主题知识、内容评估、设计、易用性和学习程度的调查问题。调查数据采用描述性统计、秩方关联检验和独立样本 t 检验进行分析:我们分析了 66 份答复(66.7% 为男性;60.6% 年龄为 13 岁)。分阶段发布课程意味着所有受访者都评估了车辆和车间课程,而 58% 的受访者评估了水上安全课程。在满分 10 分的情况下,车辆和车间课程的评分分别为 7.64 分(标准差 = 1.85)和 7.65 分(标准差 = 1.78),略高于水上安全课程(7.47 [标准差 = 1.91])。据统计,参加水上安全课程的男孩(63%表示知识有所提高;X2 = 4.98;p = .026)和 13 岁的儿童(35%;X2 = 4.31;p = .038)以及车间安全课程(50%;X2 = 4.29;p = .038)的受访者在课后自我报告的知识方面都有明显提高。受访者表示在学校(M = 6.62 [SD = 2.96])比在家里(M = 5.57 [SD = 3.07])更有可能重新玩游戏。61% 的受访者(n = 40)认为 "冷静农场 "比以前接受的其他农场安全教育更能让他们了解农场安全,也更有趣。拖拉机安全(62%)、化学品安全(58%)和枪支安全(58%)是建议添加到游戏中的最受欢迎的主题:结论:"让农场平静下来 "采用的共同设计和游戏化方法似乎成功地提高了自我报告的农场伤害预防知识,62% 的受访者认为该游戏寓教于乐。未来的扩展应纳入学生建议的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot Evaluation of a Co-Designed Gamified Farm Injury Prevention Educational Resource for Adolescents.

Objectives: Adolescents are at-risk of fatal and non-fatal injuries in the farm environment. School-based agricultural safety and farm injury prevention education is likely to be more effective when utilizing co-designed and gamification principles; however, this needs to be tested. This study examined data from a pilot evaluation of a co-designed farm injury prevention gamified educational resource for adolescents.

Methods: Online, anonymous surveys were conducted with students studying agriculture in regional Australia who had previously participated in the co-design process to develop "Calm Your Farm". Three courses were developed (vehicles, workshop, and water safety) and before and after playing each of the courses for the first time, students completed survey questions regarding self-reported knowledge on the course topic, and assessment of content, design, ease of play, and how much they learned. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi square tests of association, and independent sample t tests.

Results: We analyzed 66 responses (66.7% male; 60.6% aged 13 years). Staged course release meant all respondents assessed the vehicle and workshop courses, while 58% assessed the water safety course. Vehicle and workshop courses were rated 7.64 out of a possible 10 (SD = 1.85) and 7.65 (SD = 1.78), respectively, for the information presented, slightly higher than water safety (7.47 [SD = 1.91]). Statistically significant improvements in self-reported knowledge post play were seen among boys for the water safety course (63% said knowledge improved; X2 = 4.98; p = .026) and 13-year-olds for vehicles (35%; X2 = 4.31; p = .038) and workshop safety (50%; X2 = 4.29; p = .038). Respondents indicated being more likely to replay the game at school (M = 6.62 [SD = 2.96]) than at home (M = 5.57 [SD = 3.07]). Of respondents, 61% (n = 40) agreed that "Calm Your Farm" taught them more about farm safety and was more fun than other farm safety education previously received. Tractor safety (62%), chemical safety (58%), and firearm safety (58%) were the most popular topics suggested to be added to the game.

Conclusion: The co-design and gamification approach taken with "Calm Your Farm" appeared to be successful in improving self-reported knowledge around farm injury prevention and was perceived by 62% of the respondents as being fun and educational. Future expansion should incorporate student suggested topics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
期刊最新文献
Ensuring Safety at Sea: A Call to Action for Small-Scale Fishing Communities in Developing Countries. The Protective Factors of Suicide in Agriculture: A Global Scoping Review. Electrical Hazards on Australian Farms: A Rapid Review of Electrical Perceptions in Agriculture. Promoting Workplace Health, Safety, and Well-Being Among Essential Agricultural Workers Through Vaccine-Preventable Infectious Diseases Training in the Rio Grande Valley. Tensile Force Limits of the Sheep Spine: Comparison to Forces Required to Extricate Grain Entrapped Victims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1