首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Agromedicine最新文献

英文 中文
An Evaluation of Living Conditions and Dietary Habits of Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers: The Example of Turkey. 对季节性农业移民工人生活条件和饮食习惯的评估:以土耳其为例。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388849
İlksen Orhan, Hatice Serap Koçak

Objective: The nutritional status of seasonal migrant agricultural workers is negatively affected by problems with working conditions, wages, accommodations, and living conditions. This study aimed to investigate the living conditions, dietary habits, and food consumption frequency of seasonal migrant agricultural workers in Turkey.

Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in July and August 2022 in the neighborhoods of Akçadağ district in Malatya Province, Turkey. The sample of the study consisted of 262 seasonal migrant agricultural workers aged 15 and over who came to the region for the apricot harvest. The data were obtained using the face-to-face interview technique via a two-part questionnaire including questions on socio-demographic characteristics, living conditions, dietary behaviors and food consumption frequency.

Results: The mean age of the seasonal migrant agricultural workers was 24.16 ± 0.75, and they worked 12.01 ± 0.10 hours per day on average. It was determined 74.8% of the workers had access to clean water, and 50.4% did not think they had an adequate and balanced diet. It was found only 57.3% of the workers had a normal body mass index, 80.2% never ate fish, 53.8% never ate red meat, and 67.2% never drank milk, while only 34.4% were able to eat seasonal vegetables.

Conclusion: The findings of the study show that seasonal migrant agricultural workers in Turkey do not have suitable conditions in terms of food and accommodations, and their working conditions, wages, and health conditions are inadequate. These deficiencies have a negative effect on workers' quality of life and health status.

目标: 季节性农业移民工人的营养状况受到工作条件、工资、住宿和生活条件等问题的负面影响:季节性农业移民工人的营养状况受到工作条件、工资、住宿和生活条件等问题的负面影响。本研究旨在调查土耳其季节性农业移民工人的生活条件、饮食习惯和食物消费频率:这项描述性横断面研究于 2022 年 7 月和 8 月在土耳其马拉蒂亚省 Akçadağ 区的居民区进行。研究样本包括 262 名年龄在 15 岁及以上、来该地区采摘杏子的季节性农业移民工人。研究采用面对面访谈的方式,通过一份由两部分组成的调查问卷获得数据,其中包括社会人口特征、生活条件、饮食行为和食物消费频率等问题:结果:季节性农业移民工人的平均年龄为(24.16±0.75)岁,平均每天工作时间为(12.01±0.10)小时。74.8%的工人能喝上干净的水,50.4%的工人认为他们的饮食不够均衡。研究发现,只有 57.3% 的工人体重指数正常,80.2% 的工人从来不吃鱼,53.8% 的工人从来不吃红肉,67.2% 的工人从来不喝牛奶,只有 34.4% 的工人能吃时令蔬菜:研究结果表明,土耳其的季节性农业移民工人在饮食和住宿方面没有合适的条件,他们的工作条件、工资和健康状况也不够好。这些不足对工人的生活质量和健康状况产生了负面影响。
{"title":"An Evaluation of Living Conditions and Dietary Habits of Seasonal Migrant Agricultural Workers: The Example of Turkey.","authors":"İlksen Orhan, Hatice Serap Koçak","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388849","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The nutritional status of seasonal migrant agricultural workers is negatively affected by problems with working conditions, wages, accommodations, and living conditions. This study aimed to investigate the living conditions, dietary habits, and food consumption frequency of seasonal migrant agricultural workers in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in July and August 2022 in the neighborhoods of Akçadağ district in Malatya Province, Turkey. The sample of the study consisted of 262 seasonal migrant agricultural workers aged 15 and over who came to the region for the apricot harvest. The data were obtained using the face-to-face interview technique via a two-part questionnaire including questions on socio-demographic characteristics, living conditions, dietary behaviors and food consumption frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the seasonal migrant agricultural workers was 24.16 ± 0.75, and they worked 12.01 ± 0.10 hours per day on average. It was determined 74.8% of the workers had access to clean water, and 50.4% did not think they had an adequate and balanced diet. It was found only 57.3% of the workers had a normal body mass index, 80.2% never ate fish, 53.8% never ate red meat, and 67.2% never drank milk, while only 34.4% were able to eat seasonal vegetables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the study show that seasonal migrant agricultural workers in Turkey do not have suitable conditions in terms of food and accommodations, and their working conditions, wages, and health conditions are inadequate. These deficiencies have a negative effect on workers' quality of life and health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Stock Photos for Farmworker Health and Safety Education Materials. 评估用于农民工健康与安全教育材料的图片库。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368728
Catherine E LePrevost, Emery L Harwell, Abdul G Zahra, Michelle A Jewell, Jose A Robles Arvizu, Joseph G L Lee

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze how farmworkers are represented in stock photos available in commercial libraries for use in agricultural health and safety education materials.

Methods: We searched for images in five commercial stock photo libraries using the terms "farmworkers" and "women farmworkers" in April 2022. We used quantitative content analysis. We coded each image for containing a visible face, age, gender, skin tone, work activity, mechanization, presence of hazards, technology use, and protective equipment/clothing after establishing inter-coder reliability. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the available stock photos.

Results: We identified stock photos (n = 127) in three databases (Adobe Stock Images, Canva, and Getty Images). Two databases (Microsoft Office Image Library and Pixabay) had no relevant images at the time of the search. Only half of the photos analyzed contained a face. Light skin tones and young or middle-aged adults were more common. A majority of farming activities represented in photos were manual tasks (e.g., harvesting) with few depictions of equipment, hazards, and protective equipment/clothing.

Conclusions: Health and safety professionals tasked with developing materials for education in agricultural settings face a severe lack of imagery pertinent to the realistic conditions of farmworkers in the United States. In the databases we reviewed, photos displaying human faces, photos showing a range of skin tones and ages, and photos displaying an array of different farm hazards are likely not sufficient for material development. Health and safety professionals may benefit from sharing photos from their own work with other professionals and allocating resources for professional photo shoots in their material development projects.

研究目的本研究旨在分析商业图片库中用于农业健康和安全教育材料的图片是如何表现农民工的:我们在 2022 年 4 月使用 "农民工 "和 "女性农民工 "这两个词搜索了五个商业图片库中的图片。我们采用了定量内容分析法。在建立编码器之间的可靠性后,我们对每张图片进行了编码,包括可见脸部、年龄、性别、肤色、工作活动、机械化、是否存在危险、技术使用以及防护设备/服装。我们使用描述性统计来描述现有图片库照片的特征:我们在三个数据库(Adobe Stock Images、Canva 和 Getty Images)中找到了图片库照片(n = 127)。两个数据库(Microsoft Office Image Library 和 Pixabay)在搜索时没有相关图片。分析的照片中只有一半包含人脸。浅肤色和年轻或中年成人的照片更为常见。照片中的大多数农业活动都是手工作业(如收割),很少有关于设备、危险和防护设备/服装的描述:负责编写农业环境教育材料的健康与安全专业人员面临着严重缺乏与美国农场工人的实际情况相关的图片的问题。在我们查阅的数据库中,显示人脸的照片、显示不同肤色和年龄的照片以及显示一系列不同农场危险的照片很可能不足以用于编写教材。健康与安全专业人员可以与其他专业人员分享自己工作中的照片,并在材料开发项目中为专业照片拍摄分配资源,从而从中受益。
{"title":"Assessing Stock Photos for Farmworker Health and Safety Education Materials.","authors":"Catherine E LePrevost, Emery L Harwell, Abdul G Zahra, Michelle A Jewell, Jose A Robles Arvizu, Joseph G L Lee","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368728","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368728","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze how farmworkers are represented in stock photos available in commercial libraries for use in agricultural health and safety education materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for images in five commercial stock photo libraries using the terms \"farmworkers\" and \"women farmworkers\" in April 2022. We used quantitative content analysis. We coded each image for containing a visible face, age, gender, skin tone, work activity, mechanization, presence of hazards, technology use, and protective equipment/clothing after establishing inter-coder reliability. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the available stock photos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified stock photos (<i>n</i> = 127) in three databases (Adobe Stock Images, Canva, and Getty Images). Two databases (Microsoft Office Image Library and Pixabay) had no relevant images at the time of the search. Only half of the photos analyzed contained a face. Light skin tones and young or middle-aged adults were more common. A majority of farming activities represented in photos were manual tasks (e.g., harvesting) with few depictions of equipment, hazards, and protective equipment/clothing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health and safety professionals tasked with developing materials for education in agricultural settings face a severe lack of imagery pertinent to the realistic conditions of farmworkers in the United States. In the databases we reviewed, photos displaying human faces, photos showing a range of skin tones and ages, and photos displaying an array of different farm hazards are likely not sufficient for material development. Health and safety professionals may benefit from sharing photos from their own work with other professionals and allocating resources for professional photo shoots in their material development projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural Natural Disaster Stress: A Survey of Community Resource Use and Effect. 农村自然灾害压力:社区资源使用和影响调查。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388862
Kristin K Gaffney, Ellen Duysen, Sharon Medcalf, Christopher Wichman

Objective: This study identified rural community experiences and preferences related to available resources and their effects on stress following tornadoes and floods.

Methods: The Rural Natural Disaster Stress and Recovery survey was distributed from December 2021 to February 2022 in rural disaster-affected communities. Within the analysis sample (N = 159) of self-selected participants representing both agricultural and non-agricultural occupations, 125 responded to the Resource Use and Effect survey component that evaluated the effects of 22 resources on post-disaster stress. Additional qualitative questions provided further data.

Results: The most frequently used resources post-disaster were found to be talking about the event (98.3%), friends and neighbors (97.6%) and family (97.6%). Using a derived Impact per Use score, groups from the neighboring community and personal faith activities most often reduced stress. Resources that increased stress were identified as FEMA or other government organizations; repairing, replacing, or rebuilding property; and following news or social media. Participants reported help from their community (35.8%) or things they did for themselves (31.2%) most effectively decreased disaster stress. Family, friends, faith, neighbors, and community were top choices to decrease stress in a future disaster.

Conclusion: Rural residents identified available resources for reducing disaster stress, but some common post-disaster activities were found to increase stress. Rural emergency management should adapt response and recovery plans and activities to leverage readily accessible people, groups, and activities to mitigate negative mental and emotional health effects.

目的: 本研究确定了与可用资源相关的农村社区经验和偏好及其对龙卷风和洪水后压力的影响:本研究确定了农村社区在可用资源方面的经验和偏好及其对龙卷风和洪水后压力的影响:农村自然灾害压力与恢复调查于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月在农村受灾社区发放。在代表农业和非农业职业的自选参与者分析样本(N = 159)中,有 125 人回答了资源使用和效果调查部分,该部分评估了 22 种资源对灾后压力的影响。其他定性问题提供了进一步的数据:结果发现,灾后最常使用的资源是谈论事件(98.3%)、朋友和邻居(97.6%)以及家人(97.6%)。根据得出的每次使用的影响得分,邻近社区的团体和个人信仰活动最常减轻压力。增加压力的资源包括联邦紧急事务管理局或其他政府组织;修理、更换或重建财产;以及关注新闻或社交媒体。参与者表示,来自社区的帮助(35.8%)或他们为自己做的事情(31.2%)最有效地减轻了灾难压力。家人、朋友、信仰、邻居和社区是在未来灾难中减轻压力的首选:农村居民发现了可用于减轻灾害压力的资源,但发现一些常见的灾后活动会增加压力。农村应急管理部门应调整应对和恢复计划及活动,利用随时可以接触到的人、团体和活动来减轻对心理和情绪健康的负面影响。
{"title":"Rural Natural Disaster Stress: A Survey of Community Resource Use and Effect.","authors":"Kristin K Gaffney, Ellen Duysen, Sharon Medcalf, Christopher Wichman","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388862","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2388862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study identified rural community experiences and preferences related to available resources and their effects on stress following tornadoes and floods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Rural Natural Disaster Stress and Recovery survey was distributed from December 2021 to February 2022 in rural disaster-affected communities. Within the analysis sample (N = 159) of self-selected participants representing both agricultural and non-agricultural occupations, 125 responded to the Resource Use and Effect survey component that evaluated the effects of 22 resources on post-disaster stress. Additional qualitative questions provided further data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently used resources post-disaster were found to be talking about the event (98.3%), friends and neighbors (97.6%) and family (97.6%). Using a derived Impact per Use score, groups from the neighboring community and personal faith activities most often reduced stress. Resources that increased stress were identified as FEMA or other government organizations; repairing, replacing, or rebuilding property; and following news or social media. Participants reported help from their community (35.8%) or things they did for themselves (31.2%) most effectively decreased disaster stress. Family, friends, faith, neighbors, and community were top choices to decrease stress in a future disaster.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rural residents identified available resources for reducing disaster stress, but some common post-disaster activities were found to increase stress. Rural emergency management should adapt response and recovery plans and activities to leverage readily accessible people, groups, and activities to mitigate negative mental and emotional health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I Do Not Have the Time of Being sick": Para-Occupational Exposure and Women's Health Risk Perception in an Agricultural Community. "我没有生病的时间":农业社区中的准职业暴露与妇女的健康风险意识。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2366458
Mayra Vera-Aviles, Teresa Castillo-Burguete, Norma Pérez-Herrera

Introduction: Few studies have explored the relationship between para-occupational exposure and risk perception in farmers' families. Women are indirectly involved in agricultural activities, even though their roles most of the time are hidden. Women's para-occupational exposure and risk perceptions are important to describe, since women have a key gender role in the family's health care and possibly in the impact of acting regarding pesticide safety education. Furthermore, in farmer families, the impact of para-occupational pesticide exposure on women's health has been neglected.

Aim: Analyze pesticide para-occupational exposure scenario, knowledge, and health risk perception among women living in a farmer community.

Methods: A mixed methodology was used. Two groups of women were identified to screen the exposure scenario: Women living in a farming family and women not living in a farming family. Data on para-occupational pesticide exposure and intradomicile practices were collected by questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to identify health risk perception and risk practices.

Results: We observed a complex pesticide exposure scenario. All women were potentially exposed to pesticides through several pathways. One-third of the participants lived near a farming family or in proximity to neighbors that used pesticides at home, and one of every three women referred to spending time in a farmer's home. Among the group of women in a farming family (n = 18) stored pesticides inside the home was common; having the "safety practice" of storing pesticides in high places to avoid children being exposed. Women not living in farmimg families (n = 11) felt overexposed due to living in an agricultural community and agricultural drift exposure. Women from this group also mentioned feeling fear of developing cancerous diseases as well as fertility problems.

Conclusions: Knowledge and risk perception of pesticide exposure are similar between groups; however, women living in farming families were less willing to attend preventive health check-ups or educational programs than women not living in a farming family.

导言:很少有研究探讨农民家庭中准职业暴露与风险认知之间的关系。妇女间接参与农业活动,尽管她们的角色大多数时候是隐性的。对妇女的辅助职业暴露和风险认知进行描述非常重要,因为妇女在家庭保健中扮演着重要的性别角色,并可能对农药安全教育的行动产生影响。此外,在农民家庭中,农药准职业暴露对妇女健康的影响一直被忽视。目的:分析生活在农民社区的妇女的农药准职业暴露情景、知识和健康风险认知:方法:采用混合方法。方法:采用混合方法,确定了两组妇女来筛选接触情景:生活在农户家庭的妇女和非农户家庭的妇女。通过问卷调查和半结构式访谈收集有关准职业农药暴露和家庭内部实践的数据,以确定健康风险认知和风险实践:结果:我们观察到一种复杂的农药接触情况。所有妇女都可能通过多种途径接触农药。三分之一的参与者居住在农户附近,或与家中使用杀虫剂的邻居为邻,每三名妇女中就有一人提到在农户家中度过的时光。在农户家庭的妇女群体(n = 18)中,将农药存放在家中的情况很普遍;她们的 "安全做法" 是将农药存放在高处,以避免儿童接触到农药。非农业家庭的妇女(n = 11)由于生活在农业社区和农业漂移暴露中,感到过度暴露。这组妇女还提到,她们害怕患上癌症和生育问题:结论:不同群体对农药接触的知识和风险感知相似;但与非农户家庭的妇女相比,农户家庭的妇女更不愿意参加预防性健康检查或教育计划。
{"title":"\"I Do Not Have the Time of Being sick\": Para-Occupational Exposure and Women's Health Risk Perception in an Agricultural Community.","authors":"Mayra Vera-Aviles, Teresa Castillo-Burguete, Norma Pérez-Herrera","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2366458","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2366458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have explored the relationship between para-occupational exposure and risk perception in farmers' families. Women are indirectly involved in agricultural activities, even though their roles most of the time are hidden. Women's para-occupational exposure and risk perceptions are important to describe, since women have a key gender role in the family's health care and possibly in the impact of acting regarding pesticide safety education. Furthermore, in farmer families, the impact of para-occupational pesticide exposure on women's health has been neglected.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Analyze pesticide para-occupational exposure scenario, knowledge, and health risk perception among women living in a farmer community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methodology was used. Two groups of women were identified to screen the exposure scenario: Women living in a farming family and women not living in a farming family. Data on para-occupational pesticide exposure and intradomicile practices were collected by questionnaire and semi-structured interviews to identify health risk perception and risk practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a complex pesticide exposure scenario. All women were potentially exposed to pesticides through several pathways. One-third of the participants lived near a farming family or in proximity to neighbors that used pesticides at home, and one of every three women referred to spending time in a farmer's home. Among the group of women in a farming family (<i>n</i> = 18) stored pesticides inside the home was common; having the \"safety practice\" of storing pesticides in high places to avoid children being exposed. Women not living in farmimg families (<i>n</i> = 11) felt overexposed due to living in an agricultural community and agricultural drift exposure. Women from this group also mentioned feeling fear of developing cancerous diseases as well as fertility problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge and risk perception of pesticide exposure are similar between groups; however, women living in farming families were less willing to attend preventive health check-ups or educational programs than women not living in a farming family.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141318729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Qualitative Enquiry of On-Farm Rules About Quad Bikes (ATVs): How Rules Are Determined and Implemented at a Farm Level in Rural Australia. 关于四轮摩托车(ATV)农场规则的定性调查:澳大利亚农村农场如何确定和执行规则。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368181
Joseph Michael Freeman, Megan Nicole Keatley, Sarah Hui Xin Wong, Anthony M Brown, Emma Louise Webster

Objective: Quad bikes are a leading cause of death and incident-related injury on farms, yet little is understood about rules used by farmers to ensure their safe operation. This study explored rules about quad bikes set by those who live or work on farms. Through the case of quad bikes, this study sought to understand how rules are determined and implemented at the farm level.

Setting: A mix of farm types and locations in rural Australia including Queensland, South Australia, and New South Wales.

Participants: Eight farmers were interviewed and recruited from information sheets at farmers' markets, through a local health organisation, and a media release.

Design: Thematic analysis was used to transform data from eight semi-structured interviews with farmers in rural Australia.

Results: Data were distilled into two themes - "Rule content" described the explicit rules farmers had set on their properties, while the theme "Underlying rule principles" explored the values and norms which underpinned the creation and implementation of these rules.

Conclusions: Through the case of quad bike rules, this study illustrated how rules are determined and implemented at the farm level. Perceptions of risk were tied to farmers being experts in their own environment and therefore able to mitigate risk. In contrast to injury data, reckless use of quad bikes was perceived to cause incidents, and this was the basis of rules for adults and children.

目的:四轮摩托车是造成农场人员死亡和意外伤害的主要原因,但人们对农场主为确保四轮摩托车安全运行而制定的规则却知之甚少。本研究探讨了在农场生活或工作的人制定的有关四轮摩托车的规则。通过四轮摩托车的案例,本研究试图了解农场层面是如何确定和实施规则的:背景:澳大利亚农村地区包括昆士兰州、南澳大利亚州和新南威尔士州的各种农场类型和地点:八名农场主接受了采访,他们是通过农贸市场的信息表、当地卫生组织和媒体发布的信息招募的:设计:采用主题分析法对澳大利亚农村地区农民的八次半结构化访谈数据进行转换:结果:数据被提炼为两个主题--"规则内容 "描述了农民在其土地上制定的明确规则,而 "基本规则原则 "主题则探讨了支持这些规则的制定和实施的价值观和规范:本研究通过四轮摩托车规则的案例,说明了规则是如何在农场层面确定和实施的。对风险的认识与农场主是自身环境的专家有关,因此能够降低风险。与受伤数据相反,人们认为鲁莽使用四轮摩托车会导致事故,这也是制定成人和儿童规则的基础。
{"title":"A Qualitative Enquiry of On-Farm Rules About Quad Bikes (ATVs): How Rules Are Determined and Implemented at a Farm Level in Rural Australia.","authors":"Joseph Michael Freeman, Megan Nicole Keatley, Sarah Hui Xin Wong, Anthony M Brown, Emma Louise Webster","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368181","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quad bikes are a leading cause of death and incident-related injury on farms, yet little is understood about rules used by farmers to ensure their safe operation. This study explored rules about quad bikes set by those who live or work on farms. Through the case of quad bikes, this study sought to understand how rules are determined and implemented at the farm level.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A mix of farm types and locations in rural Australia including Queensland, South Australia, and New South Wales.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eight farmers were interviewed and recruited from information sheets at farmers' markets, through a local health organisation, and a media release.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thematic analysis was used to transform data from eight semi-structured interviews with farmers in rural Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were distilled into two themes - \"Rule content\" described the explicit rules farmers had set on their properties, while the theme \"Underlying rule principles\" explored the values and norms which underpinned the creation and implementation of these rules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the case of quad bike rules, this study illustrated how rules are determined and implemented at the farm level. Perceptions of risk were tied to farmers being experts in their own environment and therefore able to mitigate risk. In contrast to injury data, reckless use of quad bikes was perceived to cause incidents, and this was the basis of rules for adults and children.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the Relationship Between Stress, Barriers to Healthcare, and Alcohol Use in the US Agricultural Community. 研究美国农业社区中压力、医疗保健障碍和酗酒之间的关系。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2374737
Christina Proctor, Noah Hopkins

Objective: Farming is a high-risk, physically challenging occupation. Considering farmers report high stress and barriers to seeking healthcare, it is important to understand factors influencing alcohol use to tailor interventions and healthcare resources for alcohol use in rural areas.

Methods: An online survey was distributed to the agricultural community in the United States (n = 1045). Data was collected through QualtricsXM, and SPSS 28.0 was used for data analysis.

Results: Both formal healthcare challenges (β = 0.112, p = .004) and stigma (β = 0.328, p < .001) were identified as predictors of increased perceived stress, while resilience (β = -0.137, p < .001) was identified as a protective factor against perceived stress. Higher perceived stress was identified as a predictor of binge drinking behavior (β = 0.151, p < .001), and formal healthcare challenges were associated with higher drinking volume (β = 0.174, p < .001), and engaging in more frequent alcohol consumption (β = 0.123, p = .004) over the last three months. Resilience was identified as a protective factor against increased alcohol consumption (β = -0.084, p = .032). Stigmatization of help-seeking for mental health challenges was associated with fewer instances of alcohol consumption over the last three months (β = -0.169, p < .001).

Conclusion: Interventions to address stress and alcohol consumption should focus on promoting resilience, reducing stigma, and encouraging peer support to address cultural norms around mental health and alcohol use. Rural practitioners should develop cultural competence to better serve agricultural communities to prevent alcohol use disorders. To discuss ways to reduce stigma and encourage peer support to address alcohol and mental health disorders in rural farming populations.

目的:务农是一项高风险、具有体力挑战性的职业。考虑到农民的高压力和寻求医疗保健的障碍,了解影响饮酒的因素对于为农村地区的饮酒者量身定制干预措施和医疗保健资源非常重要:向美国农业社区(n = 1045)发放了一份在线调查问卷。通过 QualtricsXM 收集数据,并使用 SPSS 28.0 进行数据分析:在过去三个月中,正规医疗保健挑战(β = 0.112,p = .004)和污名化(β = 0.328,p p p = .004)。复原力被认为是防止饮酒量增加的保护因素(β = -0.084,p = .032)。在过去三个月中,因心理健康问题而寻求帮助的耻辱感与饮酒次数的减少有关(β = -0.169,p 结论:在过去三个月中,因心理健康问题而寻求帮助的耻辱感与饮酒次数的减少有关:应对压力和饮酒问题的干预措施应侧重于促进复原力、减少污名化和鼓励同伴支持,以解决与心理健康和饮酒有关的文化规范问题。农村从业人员应培养文化能力,以便更好地服务于农业社区,预防酒精使用障碍。讨论如何减少污名化并鼓励同伴支持,以解决农村农业人口中的酒精和心理健康失调问题。
{"title":"Examining the Relationship Between Stress, Barriers to Healthcare, and Alcohol Use in the US Agricultural Community.","authors":"Christina Proctor, Noah Hopkins","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2374737","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2374737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Farming is a high-risk, physically challenging occupation. Considering farmers report high stress and barriers to seeking healthcare, it is important to understand factors influencing alcohol use to tailor interventions and healthcare resources for alcohol use in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was distributed to the agricultural community in the United States (<i>n</i> = 1045). Data was collected through QualtricsXM, and SPSS 28.0 was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both formal healthcare challenges (β = 0.112, <i>p</i> = .004) and stigma (β = 0.328, <i>p</i> < .001) were identified as predictors of increased perceived stress, while resilience (β = -0.137, <i>p</i> < .001) was identified as a protective factor against perceived stress. Higher perceived stress was identified as a predictor of binge drinking behavior (β = 0.151, <i>p</i> < .001), and formal healthcare challenges were associated with higher drinking volume (β = 0.174, <i>p</i> < .001), and engaging in more frequent alcohol consumption (β = 0.123, <i>p</i> = .004) over the last three months. Resilience was identified as a protective factor against increased alcohol consumption (β = -0.084, <i>p</i> = .032). Stigmatization of help-seeking for mental health challenges was associated with fewer instances of alcohol consumption over the last three months (β = -0.169, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions to address stress and alcohol consumption should focus on promoting resilience, reducing stigma, and encouraging peer support to address cultural norms around mental health and alcohol use. Rural practitioners should develop cultural competence to better serve agricultural communities to prevent alcohol use disorders. To discuss ways to reduce stigma and encourage peer support to address alcohol and mental health disorders in rural farming populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency Medical Service Transport Time in Rural Farm and Non-Farm Pediatric Trauma. 农村农场和非农场小儿创伤的紧急医疗服务转运时间。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2385612
Sarah K Struble, Dmitry Tumin, Kori L Brewer, Kathleen K Bryant, Matthew R Ledoux, Shannon W Longshore

Objectives: Pediatric farm injuries tend to be more severe and have poorer outcomes compared to injuries sustained in non-farm settings. Timely emergency medical service (EMS) response and transport to definitive care is crucial for optimizing outcomes for trauma patients. We aimed to determine if pediatric farm injuries were associated with longer EMS response and transport times compared to pediatric non-farm injuries in rural communities.

Methods: The 2021 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) database was used to identify rural EMS activations where injured pediatric patients who were transported to a hospital. Median transport times for farm and non-farm injuries, as well as other components of prehospital time and use of air EMS transport, were compared between injuries on farms and injuries in non-farm rural settings.

Results: The analytic sample included 22,248 rural EMS activations for pediatric injuries, of which 156 (1%) were for pediatric farm injuries. For non-farm and farm injuries, the median transport times were 20 minutes and 28 minutes, respectively. Median total prehospital time was 50 minutes compared to 62 minutes, and 9.8% of patients with non-farm injuries versus 20.5% of those with farm injuries were transported to a hospital by air EMS units. After multivariable adjustment, farm vs. non-farm injury location was associated with a 4 minute increase in EMS transport time, but no difference in initial EMS response time, EMS time on scene, or use of air EMS units.

Conclusion: Among children sustaining an injury that resulted in rural EMS activation, farm injuries were associated with prolonged transport time compared to non-farm injuries, which may contribute to worse in-hospital outcomes described to pediatric farm injuries in prior research.

目的:与在非农业环境中受伤相比,小儿农场受伤往往更为严重,治疗效果也更差。及时的紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应和转运对于优化创伤患者的治疗效果至关重要。我们旨在确定,与农村社区的小儿非农受伤相比,小儿农场受伤是否与更长的急救服务响应和转运时间有关:方法:我们使用 2021 年国家急救信息系统(NEMSIS)数据库来识别农村急救服务的启动情况,其中有受伤的儿科患者被送往医院。比较了农场和非农受伤者的中位转运时间、院前时间的其他组成部分以及空中急救运输的使用情况:分析样本包括 22,248 次因小儿受伤而启动的农村急救服务,其中 156 次(1%)因小儿农场受伤而启动。非农业和农业受伤的中位运送时间分别为 20 分钟和 28 分钟。院前总时间的中位数为 50 分钟,而农场受伤患者的中位数为 62 分钟,9.8% 的非农场受伤患者和 20.5% 的农场受伤患者被空中急救中心送往医院。经过多变量调整后,农场与非农场受伤地点的急救转运时间增加了4分钟,但在急救初步响应时间、急救到达现场时间或空中急救单位的使用方面没有差异:结论:在因受伤而启动农村急救服务的儿童中,农场受伤比非农场受伤的转运时间更长,这可能是先前研究中描述的小儿农场受伤住院结果更差的原因。
{"title":"Emergency Medical Service Transport Time in Rural Farm and Non-Farm Pediatric Trauma.","authors":"Sarah K Struble, Dmitry Tumin, Kori L Brewer, Kathleen K Bryant, Matthew R Ledoux, Shannon W Longshore","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2385612","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2385612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric farm injuries tend to be more severe and have poorer outcomes compared to injuries sustained in non-farm settings. Timely emergency medical service (EMS) response and transport to definitive care is crucial for optimizing outcomes for trauma patients. We aimed to determine if pediatric farm injuries were associated with longer EMS response and transport times compared to pediatric non-farm injuries in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2021 National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) database was used to identify rural EMS activations where injured pediatric patients who were transported to a hospital. Median transport times for farm and non-farm injuries, as well as other components of prehospital time and use of air EMS transport, were compared between injuries on farms and injuries in non-farm rural settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 22,248 rural EMS activations for pediatric injuries, of which 156 (1%) were for pediatric farm injuries. For non-farm and farm injuries, the median transport times were 20 minutes and 28 minutes, respectively. Median total prehospital time was 50 minutes compared to 62 minutes, and 9.8% of patients with non-farm injuries versus 20.5% of those with farm injuries were transported to a hospital by air EMS units. After multivariable adjustment, farm vs. non-farm injury location was associated with a 4 minute increase in EMS transport time, but no difference in initial EMS response time, EMS time on scene, or use of air EMS units.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among children sustaining an injury that resulted in rural EMS activation, farm injuries were associated with prolonged transport time compared to non-farm injuries, which may contribute to worse in-hospital outcomes described to pediatric farm injuries in prior research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141793787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seasonal Patterns of Injury Characteristics Among Farmers and Ranchers in the U.S. Central States. 美国中部各州农民和牧场主受伤特征的季节性模式。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2387645
Rishad Ahmed, Yi Du, Gleb Haynatzki, Sarah Tucker, Athena K Ramos, Risto H Rautiainen

Objective: In high-risk agricultural environments, tasks, weather, and work conditions vary throughout the year. Also, injuries peak during certain periods. The primary objective of this study was to examine operator- and farm-level characteristics as risk factors for injuries within each of the four seasons. The secondary objective was to examine seasonal differences in the incident location and primary cause of these injuries.

Method: We analyzed data from the 2018 and 2020 Farm and Ranch Health and Safety Surveys (FRHSS), conducted in seven U.S. states by the Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH), which were collected using a stratified random sampling approach to ensure representativeness. The survey data were merged with operation-level data from the Farm Market iD database. We employed Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to examine the association of seasonal injuries with individual and operation-level characteristics. The chi-square test of independence was used to assess the association between injury incident location and season, as well as injury cause and season. Pairwise Z-tests of proportions were conducted to evaluate the differences in the proportions of injuries due to specific combinations of injury location and cause across each pair of seasons.

Results: Surveys conducted in 2018 and 2020 yielded a combined response rate of 15.9%, with 5,428 responses and 7,915 unique operators. Of these, 903 operators reported at least one injury during the past 12 months. Seasonally, most injuries occurred in spring (34.2%), followed by summer (24.7%). Male operators had higher injury odds in the spring (adjusted OR = 1.42) and summer (aOR = 2.41). Those managing both a farm and a ranch reported increased injury risks in winter (aOR = 1.73) and spring (aOR = 1.48). Operators in cow-calf operations faced higher springtime injury risks (aOR = 1.45). High stress and exhaustion were consistent risk factors across all seasons. The highest proportion of injury incidents occurred in the farmyard (43.6%), and livestock were the most common cause of injury (24.9%).

Conclusion: Results highlight the need for season-specific prevention and intervention strategies, considering farmers' and ranchers' risk characteristics, injury locations, and causes. These findings can inform targeted measures for high-risk populations at optimal times and locations.

目的:在高风险的农业环境中,一年四季的任务、天气和工作条件各不相同。此外,工伤事故也会在某些时期达到高峰。本研究的主要目的是研究四季中作为受伤风险因素的操作员和农场特征。次要目标是研究事故地点的季节性差异和这些伤害的主要原因:我们分析了美国中部各州农业安全与健康中心(CS-CASH)在美国 7 个州进行的 2018 年和 2020 年农场和牧场健康与安全调查(FRHSS)的数据,这些数据是采用分层随机抽样方法收集的,以确保代表性。调查数据与农场市场 iD 数据库中的操作层面数据进行了合并。我们采用广义估计方程(GEE)来检验季节性伤害与个体和操作层面特征之间的关联。独立的卡方检验用于评估伤害事故发生地点与季节以及伤害原因与季节之间的关联。对比例进行了配对 Z 检验,以评估在每对季节中,因受伤地点和原因的特定组合而造成的伤害比例差异:2018 年和 2020 年进行的调查得到了 15.9% 的综合回复率,共有 5,428 份回复和 7,915 名独特的操作员。其中,903 名操作员报告在过去 12 个月中至少发生过一次伤害事故。从季节上看,大多数伤害事故发生在春季(34.2%),其次是夏季(24.7%)。男性经营者在春季(调整后 OR = 1.42)和夏季(aOR = 2.41)受伤的几率较高。同时管理农场和牧场的经营者在冬季(aOR = 1.73)和春季(aOR = 1.48)的受伤风险较高。养牛场的经营者在春季受伤的风险更高(aOR = 1.45)。高度紧张和疲惫是所有季节都存在的风险因素。受伤事件发生在农田的比例最高(43.6%),牲畜是最常见的受伤原因(24.9%):结论:研究结果突出表明,有必要根据农民和牧场主的风险特征、受伤地点和原因,制定针对不同季节的预防和干预策略。这些发现可为在最佳时间和地点针对高风险人群采取有针对性的措施提供依据。
{"title":"Seasonal Patterns of Injury Characteristics Among Farmers and Ranchers in the U.S. Central States.","authors":"Rishad Ahmed, Yi Du, Gleb Haynatzki, Sarah Tucker, Athena K Ramos, Risto H Rautiainen","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2387645","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2387645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In high-risk agricultural environments, tasks, weather, and work conditions vary throughout the year. Also, injuries peak during certain periods. The primary objective of this study was to examine operator- and farm-level characteristics as risk factors for injuries within each of the four seasons. The secondary objective was to examine seasonal differences in the incident location and primary cause of these injuries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed data from the 2018 and 2020 Farm and Ranch Health and Safety Surveys (FRHSS), conducted in seven U.S. states by the Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Health (CS-CASH), which were collected using a stratified random sampling approach to ensure representativeness. The survey data were merged with operation-level data from the Farm Market iD database. We employed Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to examine the association of seasonal injuries with individual and operation-level characteristics. The chi-square test of independence was used to assess the association between injury incident location and season, as well as injury cause and season. Pairwise Z-tests of proportions were conducted to evaluate the differences in the proportions of injuries due to specific combinations of injury location and cause across each pair of seasons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys conducted in 2018 and 2020 yielded a combined response rate of 15.9%, with 5,428 responses and 7,915 unique operators. Of these, 903 operators reported at least one injury during the past 12 months. Seasonally, most injuries occurred in spring (34.2%), followed by summer (24.7%). Male operators had higher injury odds in the spring (adjusted OR = 1.42) and summer (aOR = 2.41). Those managing both a farm and a ranch reported increased injury risks in winter (aOR = 1.73) and spring (aOR = 1.48). Operators in cow-calf operations faced higher springtime injury risks (aOR = 1.45). High stress and exhaustion were consistent risk factors across all seasons. The highest proportion of injury incidents occurred in the farmyard (43.6%), and livestock were the most common cause of injury (24.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results highlight the need for season-specific prevention and intervention strategies, considering farmers' and ranchers' risk characteristics, injury locations, and causes. These findings can inform targeted measures for high-risk populations at optimal times and locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies. 讲故事:在农场健康与安全态度研究中使用小故事克服乐观偏见。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638
Mohammad Mohammadrezaei, David Meredith, John McNamara

Objective: Measuring attitudes of farmers to safe farming practices using quantitative causal relationship approaches is central to improving understanding of (un)safe practices. This knowledge is important in the development of effective farm safety interventions. However, the accuracy of quantitative attitudinal studies in explaining farmers' decision-making faces a potential measurement challenge, i.e. a high level of optimism bias. In this paper, we present research that develops and tests farm safety attitudinal questions that are framed around "real-life" farming practices with the objective of reducing optimism bias.

Methods: We apply construal level theory (CLT) to support the design of vignettes that reflect common risk scenarios faced by farmers. Applying qualitative analysis of 274 fatal farm incidents that occurred in Ireland between 2004 and 2018 we identify the occupational behaviors (what farmers do), social (who are farmers), spatial (where farming takes place), and temporal (when farming happens) dimensions of risks resulting in most deaths. The results informed subsequent co-design activities with farm safety experts and farm advisors to develop "real-life" scenarios, attitudinal questions, and response options. The questionnaire was piloted and subsequently implemented to collect data from a sample of 381 farmers with either tractors or livestock. The results of the survey were compared to previous attitudinal research on farmer's attitudes to safety in Ireland to establish if there was as follows: i) increased variance in the responses, and ii) a statistically significant difference in the attitudes of respondents compared to the results reported in previous studies.

Results: The findings established that when farmers were provided with real-life scenarios, their responses were less optimistic and more varied, i.e. there was a greater range of responses, compared to previous studies.

Conclusion: Applying CTL to the development of attitudinal survey instruments anchors attitudinal questions within farming specific occupational, social, spatial, and temporal contexts. The use of vignettes that draw on real-life scenarios offers the potential for improved design of surveys that seek to understand farmer/worker practices. The results suggest that this approach can improve the measurement of attitudes to farm safety.

目的:使用定量因果关系方法衡量农民对安全耕作方式的态度,对于增进对(不)安全耕作方式的了解至关重要。这些知识对于制定有效的农业安全干预措施非常重要。然而,定量态度研究在解释农民决策方面的准确性面临着潜在的测量挑战,即高度的乐观偏差。在本文中,我们介绍了围绕 "现实生活 "中的农业实践开发和测试农场安全态度问题的研究,目的是减少乐观偏差:方法:我们运用构想水平理论(CLT)来支持反映农民面临的常见风险情景的小故事的设计。通过对 2004 年至 2018 年期间在爱尔兰发生的 274 起致命农场事故进行定性分析,我们确定了导致大多数人死亡的风险的职业行为(农民做什么)、社会(谁是农民)、空间(在哪里耕作)和时间(何时耕作)维度。这些结果为随后与农场安全专家和农场顾问开展共同设计活动提供了信息,以开发 "真实生活 "场景、态度问题和回答选项。调查问卷经过试用,随后从 381 名拥有拖拉机或牲畜的农民中抽样收集数据。调查结果与之前对爱尔兰农民安全态度的研究结果进行了比较,以确定是否存在以下情况:i) 回答的差异增大;ii) 与之前研究报告的结果相比,受访者的态度在统计上有显著差异:结果:研究结果表明,与之前的研究相比,当为农民提供真实生活场景时,他们的回答不那么乐观,而且更加多样,即回答的范围更大:将 CTL 应用于态度调查工具的开发,可将态度问题锚定在农业特定的职业、社会、空间和时间背景中。利用真实生活场景中的小故事,有可能改进旨在了解农民/工人做法的调查设计。结果表明,这种方法可以改善对农场安全态度的测量。
{"title":"Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies.","authors":"Mohammad Mohammadrezaei, David Meredith, John McNamara","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Measuring attitudes of farmers to safe farming practices using quantitative causal relationship approaches is central to improving understanding of (un)safe practices. This knowledge is important in the development of effective farm safety interventions. However, the accuracy of quantitative attitudinal studies in explaining farmers' decision-making faces a potential measurement challenge, i.e. a high level of optimism bias. In this paper, we present research that develops and tests farm safety attitudinal questions that are framed around \"real-life\" farming practices with the objective of reducing optimism bias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We apply construal level theory (CLT) to support the design of vignettes that reflect common risk scenarios faced by farmers. Applying qualitative analysis of 274 fatal farm incidents that occurred in Ireland between 2004 and 2018 we identify the occupational behaviors (what farmers do), social (who are farmers), spatial (where farming takes place), and temporal (when farming happens) dimensions of risks resulting in most deaths. The results informed subsequent co-design activities with farm safety experts and farm advisors to develop \"real-life\" scenarios, attitudinal questions, and response options. The questionnaire was piloted and subsequently implemented to collect data from a sample of 381 farmers with either tractors or livestock. The results of the survey were compared to previous attitudinal research on farmer's attitudes to safety in Ireland to establish if there was as follows: i) increased variance in the responses, and ii) a statistically significant difference in the attitudes of respondents compared to the results reported in previous studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings established that when farmers were provided with real-life scenarios, their responses were less optimistic and more varied, i.e. there was a greater range of responses, compared to previous studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Applying CTL to the development of attitudinal survey instruments anchors attitudinal questions within farming specific occupational, social, spatial, and temporal contexts. The use of vignettes that draw on real-life scenarios offers the potential for improved design of surveys that seek to understand farmer/worker practices. The results suggest that this approach can improve the measurement of attitudes to farm safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141421546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age Group-Wise Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases Among Shrimp Cultivators in India: A Retrospective Analysis of Disability-Adjusted Life Years Method. 印度虾养殖者非传染性疾病的年龄组负担:残疾调整生命年回顾分析法》。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368737
Chandan Kumar Swain, Himanshu Sekhar Rout

Objective: Despite generating huge employment opportunities and profitable business, fishing is considered a dangerous occupation due to challenging weather conditions and exposure to unhealthy occupational factors and lifestyles, which contribute to various health issues. However, few studies have examined the health status of shrimp cultivators. Consequently, this study aims to estimate the age group-wise burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among shrimp cultivators.

Methods: Simple random sampling was employed for collecting data. The sample size was 357 shrimp cultivators. Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) and relative risk (RR) methods were used to measure the burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators. This study reported the burden of NCDs per 100,000 shrimp cultivators.

Results: The top five prevalence of NCDs per 100,000 shrimp cultivators were mental disorders (85,434), musculoskeletal diseases (26,325), digestive diseases (9,803), diabetes (5,882), and cardiovascular diseases (4,481). DALY per 100,000 shrimp cultivators was 33,407.59, while at the national level, it was 24,775.99 per 100,000 people across all age groups. The RR of NCDs among shrimp cultivators in terms of DALY was 1.35, indicating a 0.35 times higher burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators than at the national level. The largest RR of NCDs was found among shrimp cultivators aged 15-49 years (1.85), followed by 50-69 years (1.09). The highest percentage changes in the burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators, resulting from changes in the methods of estimating DALY, was observed in the age group of 70 years and above (-48.36%) followed by 15-49 years (-46.08%) and 50-69 years (-40.33%) when compared to the baseline method of estimating DALY without utilizing age weightage and discount rate.

Conclusions: Focus should be given to improving the lifestyle and occupational factors of shrimp cultivators to mitigate the burden of NCDs.

目的:尽管渔业创造了巨大的就业机会和有利可图的业务,但由于具有挑战性的天气条件和暴露于不健康的职业因素和生活方式,渔业被认为是一种危险的职业,这导致了各种健康问题。然而,很少有研究调查对虾养殖者的健康状况。因此,本研究旨在估算各年龄组对虾养殖者非传染性疾病(NCDs)的负担:方法:采用简单随机抽样收集数据。样本量为 357 名虾养殖者。采用残疾调整生命年(DALY)和相对风险(RR)方法来衡量养虾者的非传染性疾病负担。本研究报告了每 10 万养虾户的非传染性疾病负担:结果:每 10 万对虾养殖者的非传染性疾病发病率前五位分别是精神障碍(85,434 例)、肌肉骨骼疾病(26,325 例)、消化系统疾病(9,803 例)、糖尿病(5,882 例)和心血管疾病(4,481 例)。每 100,000 名虾养殖者的残疾调整寿命年数为 33,407.59 年,而在全国范围内,各年龄组每 100,000 人的残疾调整寿命年数为 24,775.99 年。养虾者患非传染性疾病的死亡率为 1.35,表明养虾者患非传染性疾病的负担是全国水平的 0.35 倍。年龄在 15-49 岁的对虾养殖者的非传染性疾病死亡率最大(1.85),其次是 50-69 岁(1.09)。与不使用年龄加权和贴现率的 DALY 估算基线方法相比,70 岁及以上年龄组的非传染性疾病负担变化百分比最高(-48.36%),其次是 15-49 岁(-46.08%)和 50-69 岁(-40.33%):应重点改善对虾养殖者的生活方式和职业因素,以减轻非传染性疾病的负担。
{"title":"Age Group-Wise Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases Among Shrimp Cultivators in India: A Retrospective Analysis of Disability-Adjusted Life Years Method.","authors":"Chandan Kumar Swain, Himanshu Sekhar Rout","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368737","DOIUrl":"10.1080/1059924X.2024.2368737","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite generating huge employment opportunities and profitable business, fishing is considered a dangerous occupation due to challenging weather conditions and exposure to unhealthy occupational factors and lifestyles, which contribute to various health issues. However, few studies have examined the health status of shrimp cultivators. Consequently, this study aims to estimate the age group-wise burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among shrimp cultivators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Simple random sampling was employed for collecting data. The sample size was 357 shrimp cultivators. Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) and relative risk (RR) methods were used to measure the burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators. This study reported the burden of NCDs per 100,000 shrimp cultivators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top five prevalence of NCDs per 100,000 shrimp cultivators were mental disorders (85,434), musculoskeletal diseases (26,325), digestive diseases (9,803), diabetes (5,882), and cardiovascular diseases (4,481). DALY per 100,000 shrimp cultivators was 33,407.59, while at the national level, it was 24,775.99 per 100,000 people across all age groups. The RR of NCDs among shrimp cultivators in terms of DALY was 1.35, indicating a 0.35 times higher burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators than at the national level. The largest RR of NCDs was found among shrimp cultivators aged 15-49 years (1.85), followed by 50-69 years (1.09). The highest percentage changes in the burden of NCDs among shrimp cultivators, resulting from changes in the methods of estimating DALY, was observed in the age group of 70 years and above (-48.36%) followed by 15-49 years (-46.08%) and 50-69 years (-40.33%) when compared to the baseline method of estimating DALY without utilizing age weightage and discount rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focus should be given to improving the lifestyle and occupational factors of shrimp cultivators to mitigate the burden of NCDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141421545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1